dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,991 through 4,005 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2346523
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    That will make Feb 1st, 2011 VERY interesting 🙂

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2346721
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Hey Scooter
    Do you know if the F-35A can be fitted for probe and drogue refuelling like the B/C when built?

    Yes. Space has been reserved in the F-35A design for a nose probe. There are international partners that will be using P&D on the F-35A.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/F-35A_Drouge.jpg

    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    That is one SERIOUSLY small raydome 😉

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2347137
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Only one type of gun, the 25mm GAU-22/A (Internally on the A and externally on the B&C)

    The GAU-22/A was adapted from the GAU-12. It has only 4 barrels where the GAU-12 has 5.

    http://www.gdatp.com/files/PDF/A079_F35LightningII.pdf

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2347155
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    What about the gun pod?

    Weapons testing will not be for over a year on the B & C.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2347161
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The FY2011 F-35A model is already over $40 million (probably $50 million) cheaper than the FY2009 F-22s. Throw in the inflation difference & the equipment it carries that the F-22 does not (IRST, EODAS, 2k weapons load, space for active jammers, prewired for NGJ, etc) and the price gap widens considerably.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2347387
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The far right/left missiles cannot be launched IMO

    It depends on what the launch sequence is. If there is a pivoting launcher that opens with the door, or if the first missile has to go before the second could be the way it works.

    Of course, the purpose of me posting the pic was not to say that all F-35s will have 6 x AAM nor to even say when they will have it… just to say that they are definitely spending money on it’s development.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2347584
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Anyone else notice this?

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/06ba78d6.jpg

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2347743
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I have never seen him (or anyone else who is credible) claim that the F-35 is the F-22’s equal. What has been said many times is that in the A2A arena the F-35 is second only to the F-22.

    in reply to: Hot Dog's F-35 Cyber News Thread #4 (four) YEEEEEE-HAAA!!! #2347873
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The F-35 will carry 6-AAM’s from Blk 5 on and is nearly the match of the F-22. Which, has been well documented by the US Government and Lockheed Martin.

    Feel free to provide a source for that! I just remember the USAF’s own simulations which indicated a clear advantage for the F-22 vs. F-35 wrt aircombat performance/effectiveness.

    What Scooter should have said is that the F-35 is scheduled to receive that ability in Blk5. A little background….

    Each block takes, from initial inception to IOC, many years to mature. Here is the latest (still a couple of years old and likely has shifted to the right a year or two) Post-SDD development schedule.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/64589893.jpg

    One of the things we can see is that, even if the shift to the right has already happened, we are in the “Detailed Planning” stage for Block 5.

    Next, what is in Block 5. The DoD has kept very quiet on the details of what is included in each of the blocks, both Pre and Post-SDD. The one source we do have is the Norway docs from a few years ago.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/F-35BlockUpgrades.jpg

    I have found a few other sources as well that include JAGM with Blk4 and AARGM with Blk6.

    Back to the 6xAAM issue. The DoD is already funding development of the 6xAAM upgrade. IIRC, earlier this year LM (through the Skunk Works) completed a study showing that is was possible with very little modification to the airframe.

    While there is no guarantee of any one component being in any particular Blk upgrade, it is clear that the DoD has scheduled it for Blk5 and they are currently funding it’s development.

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2347920
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Do you seriously think that the IR “comparison” vid was objective? What that clearly showed was that different FLIR systems detecting at different wavelengths, operating under different conditions and using different settings will make the ignorant believe anything.

    For God’s sake, the Mig-29 was even parked on the ground! It’s was obvious that the “comparison” was worthless when it showed a B-2 as being easier to detect than a Raf from less than 100 feet away.

    in reply to: F-35 News Thread III #2348503
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I fixed the link for you.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmnC2r8fRz8

    in reply to: F-35 News Thread III #2348668
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Some seem to forget how the APG-81 handled itself at Northern Edge. It was able to still do it’s job in a jamming environment where there were MULTIPLE modern jamming AC.

    They had EA-6 aircraft up there that year for NE09, flying from VAQ138.

    Considering the early nature of that flying APG-81 and the adversary having dedicated jamming aircraft, I do not give self-protection jammers much of a chance against the APG-81 (or 77 for that matter).

    Not to say that the F-35 is invisible or invincible, just that it will do much better than most people think.

    http://www.jber.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123156090

    “The radar was subjected to a scale of scenarios that far exceeded typical developmental or operational test program requirements,” said Pete Bartos, a former U.S. Navy F/A-18 operational test director and currently Northrop Grumman program manager for fifth-generation fighter requirements, improvements and derivatives. “In the past, typical EP testing consisted of a few sorties versus a single or maybe two jammers at once. This test was unique in that it included flights versus multiple types of advanced jammers on several aircraft formations at once.

    Large force air, land, and sea combat scenarios along with airborne interdiction of maritime target scenarios provided unparalleled opportunities for warfighters to ‘train-as-they-fight’ in a complex radio frequency environment.

    http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=168340

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2349189
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    There has not been any official numbers released, only vague generalities.

    in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2349242
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I also noticed that the display has what looks like a lift fan, LOL.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,991 through 4,005 (of 4,849 total)