dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,156 through 4,170 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2408114
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Hardly, the night-traffic on the highway in mind.

    The presence, or lack thereof, of light has no effect on either SAR or EOTS functionality.

    Next.

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2408738
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwGzzE4fNTA

    Something like that in the night will not differ much from an ordinary truck by something at several hundred knots from above, when the synthetic radar picture will show the size at best. http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/TerrorismTalk_files/slide0059_image055.gif
    SAR. I do not remember about pics from that F-15E attacks for obvious reasons.

    You are not only looking at older generations of SAR images, you are completely ignoring the benefits of EOTS to confirm the ID of the target.

    Here is a PDF that goes into many details and examples of the JSF’s SAR ability.

    http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2007targets/Day1/Davisday1.pdf

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/f5c3e3e9.jpg

    Here is an EOTS shot from 36nm away and a vehicle the size of a Scud launcher would be easy to ID.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/24491da5.jpg

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2408929
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The empty launcher was hardly to distinguish from a commercial truck. Several truck-drivers transporting goods from and to Aqaba in Jordan Awere killed by F-15E-crews during such nights. A F-35 will change nothing about that really, without real intel infos about hide-outs in advance. 😉

    The Scud launcher looks nothing like a commercial truck.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/37/Scud_TEL_launch.jpg

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2408963
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Exactly what can the F-35 do about it, anyway? Dodge or intercept it?

    Well, if the F-35 was flying in GW1 the Scud launches would have been found and destroyed very quickly. A few flying in Israel, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia would have triangulated any Scud launch from anywhere in Iraq as soon as it happened.

    If satellites can detect the launches so easily, why were the Scuds in GW1 so much of a problem and hardly any found?

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2410023
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    It explicitly works WITHOUT a cue.

    Unlike other sensors, DAS picks up targets without assistance from an external cue.

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2412079
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    No it’s not. It is a Air-Dominance fighter with VERY limited air-to-ground roles.

    Can only use 1000lb JDAM and SDBs. Is now only getting moving target modes for the radar and cannot use LGBs at all. Cannot share data outside the F-22 network till BACN or MADL. No FLIR and no laser designator. No HARM capability. Cannot use jamming pods and will not get NGJ. Cannot use any cruise missiles, JSOWs, cluster munitions, etc, etc, etc.

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2412544
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    New F-35 Vid

    Props to SNAFU for the find

    My fav part is at 1:08 showing SIX internal AMRAAMs!

    http://www.youtube.com/v/y44lftPGWvM?fs=1&hl=en_U

    Mod Edit: No hot-linking, please!

    in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2414533
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    SDB1 will be part of Block 3 F-35s and SDB2 will be part of Block 4.

    What;s the problem?

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2417378
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The NGJ does not need to use use the APG-81 as it will also be fitted to the F/A-18G.

    As far as the APG-81’s jamming ability and duty cycle, the F-35’s VLO stealth decreases the need to jam at long ranges so the loss of range is not a problem.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2417764
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    I was speaking as a whole, especially LPI, the APG-81 is only short of the APG-77.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2417829
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The true advantage that the F-35 has is that because of the better radar and VLO capabilities, it decides when and how it will engage.

    If it detects a flight of SU-35s, it can decide to alter it’s course and engage from the side or above.

    Also, RWRs will not detect the AIM-120 till it goes active in the last stage of the flight. If the F-35 launched from >100km, the MAWS of the SU-35 would not detect it and would not pick up the passive heat signature of the missile till it was only 5-10km away (due to motor not being active in the last part of the flight).

    in reply to: Confused- help please #2422907
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Which Block adds AIM-120D?

    Well, Block 5 does mention the follow-on to the 120D, i.e. “AIM-120 (+D)” which means that the baseline 120D will be part of either Blk3 or 4 (my bet is 3).

    btw, The USAF F-35A is to be IOC in 2013/14 (at the latest), not 2016. Did you mean FOC since you stated Blk3 operational in 2014?

    As far as which weapons come in which block, that necessity (of a Blk upgrade for weapons) will fade as time goes on thanks to UAI (Universal Armament Interface). This will allow F-35s (and other legacy fighters) to be updated with the weapons data when the weapon is loaded, no Blk upgrade needed.

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/F-35BlockUpgrades.jpg

    btw, The AGM-154C is part of SDD for internal carriage:

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/aa8fdc8e.jpg

    in reply to: Confused- help please #2422929
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Not always mate- look at South America, the US wanted to sell the F-16’s but refused to sell advanced weapons like AMRAAM and ASRAAM, something about not introducing advanced weapons in lesser developed countries- so those countries went to the Russians and bought up big.

    That is not how they handled the C7.

    The AIM-120C7 went IOC in 2006 and started to be cleared for sale to allies within 1 year of IOC.

    Israel in 2007
    Taiwan in 2007
    UAE in 2008
    Turkey in 2008
    Finland in 2008
    Morocco in 2008
    Singapore in 2008
    Kuwait in 2008
    Brazil in 2009
    Jordan in 2009
    Bahrain in 2009
    Chile in 2009

    Obviously the US is no longer playing the AMRAAM Diplomacy game.

    Peter, as to the first RAAF F-35s, they (the US-based trainers) might likely have the C7. I was speaking of the first RAAF IOC unit likely having the 120D.

    in reply to: Confused- help please #2422954
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    If the F-35 can be sold to a customer, then you can be sure they will be cleared for the 120D.

    in reply to: Confused- help please #2422991
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Why would the Blk3 F-35s be AIM-120C7 since AIM-120D’s are already in production?

    btw, The only C7’s currently being produced are for current FMS customer orders. Also, Blk4 deliveries are due to start delivery in 2015/2016 time-frame.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,156 through 4,170 (of 4,849 total)