dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,411 through 4,425 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: the F-35, does it make any sense? #2395965
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Thanks.. LOL

    The May 2009 Program update had the Pre-SWAT numbers.

    I noticed that the FY2011 F-35A budget docs has some pretty bad addition errors also.

    in reply to: COIN aircraft carrier #2008520
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    And nothing will change as long as the Air Force has its hand on CAS and tactical transport and akin missions. An Army Aviation Corps is *so* overdue!

    BRAVO.. and give them their C-27s while your at it.

    in reply to: COIN aircraft carrier #2008527
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Looks good, but let’s be realistic: it doesn’t exist, whereas the Super Tucano – which can do pretty much everything the proposed new Bronco can – does exist and can be bought quite cheaply. So why spend billions re-inventing the wheel?

    They would not have to spend billions, tens of millions maybe.

    Besides, the OV-10 is the most versatile COIN aircraft flying. Making an “X” version is a no-brainer.

    1. STOL

    2. Twin Engine

    3. Ball turret gun system, aka mini spooky

    4. Best visibility

    5. Proven combat track record

    6. Internal cargo capability

    7. Paratroop insertion capability

    8. Demonstrated carrier capability

    in reply to: the F-35, does it make any sense? #2397112
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Yeah.. I can go to bed now… Good Night 😉

    in reply to: the F-35, does it make any sense? #2397142
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    It will have AESA and that is much heavier than it’s current radar.

    in reply to: Typhoon Beating F 15 ? Just PR talk ? #2397146
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The ALQ-99 are powered by the little propellors on front of the pods….

    Which, with the pods themselves, cause lots of drag… which in turn reduces range. This is exacerbated by the fact that a 5-pod F-18 cannot carry external fuel.

    in reply to: COIN aircraft carrier #2008563
    SpudmanWP
    Participant
    in reply to: the F-35, does it make any sense? #2397158
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    AESA and EODAS

    in reply to: the F-35, does it make any sense? #2397235
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The latest program doc has it at :

    Length: 51.4 ft
    Wing Area: 460 ft2
    Weight (Empty): 29,036 lbs
    Internal Fuel: 18,840 lbs
    Range: 600 + nm

    in reply to: Typhoon Beating F 15 ? Just PR talk ? #2397293
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Here is an update from the FY2011 budget numbers.

    Looks like they pulled their heads out of their a$$e$ and added procurement for the F-15C and F-15E AESA upgrades in the FY2011 budget.

    Here is a breakdown of the Program & Year of procurement.
    Program FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015<br />
    F-15C 14 14 17 17 14<br />
    F-15E 6 10 13 12 13<br />

    Installation will be about two years after procurement.

    in reply to: PAK-FA NATO code name #2399764
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Finally

    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Doesn’t make sense. The Raptor has no passive homing A2A weapons (except for the HOJ capability of the AMRAAM which I doubt they have been using there).

    Also sounds awfully like 1on1 stuff. Does either air force actually do such missions? Would be extremely surprised if the USAF did. Don’t really know about the French. Seems like a made up story to me all together.

    The Aim-9M can only be used passively. It can also be queued from the EW system, but it has to lock on before launch.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2401236
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    hehe.. the Militaryphotos.net T-50 forum is pushing 195+ pages already.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2402045
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Production started in 2007 for the airframes that will be delivered to the USAF.

    2007 = 2 F-35s
    2008 = 12 F-35s
    2009 = 17 F-35s
    2010 = 30 F-35s

    At it’s height of production, the F-35 is planned to be built at a rate of 229 per year.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2403522
    SpudmanWP
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 4,411 through 4,425 (of 4,849 total)