JSOW & JSM are perfectly fine for frigate/destroyer sized targets (especially since they have target discrimination & aim-point control) and OTH LRASM et al can be used on anything larger.
I did say please… :stupid:
Finland Seeks Bids for €10bn Fighter Jet Purchase
sold fewer than 300 of its F-35
I am amazed that research & math skills are so lacking.
The correct number is 645 (Production numbers through Lot 13 – FY2019)
https://a855196877272cb14560-2a4fa819a63ddcc0c289f9457bc3ebab.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/13567/fastfacts4-18_2.pdf
Finland Seeks Bids for €10bn Fighter Jet Purchase
“The more users there are, the more opportunities there are to find other countries with interests similar to those of Finland,” says Jyri Raitasalo, Military Professor of War Studies at the Finnish National Defence University.
So, the F-35 then? :rolleyes:
Please stop posting ****nik as actual news.
This click-bait appeared on the News thread
The F-35 has a basic flaw that means an F-22 hybrid could outclass it — and that’s a big problem
This line is BS
The new fighter could force the US into a tough decision about the future of the F-35.
If anything, it would for PCA & F/A-XX to the left. It would not affect the F-35 buy at all.
He added that Japan would love a jet that can fire anti-ship missiles, but that the F-35 is just too small to hold them inside its stealthy weapons bays.
Guess he has never heard of JSOW or JSM. The F-22’s bay is smaller than the F-35’s. Does he think that the F-22/35 hybrid will mount LRASM sized missiles internally? Besides, LRASM has the range to be fired from well below the horizon so wing-mounted AShMs will not be an issue.
In the end, the US Air Force would end up in a very difficult position — having to live with Japan getting a better fighter, or spending money earmarked for F-35s, which the US sees as the future of its force, on another aircraft it didn’t come up with.
Wrong. The F-35 is replacing the F-16/18 & Harrier. Like I said earlier, this is an issue for PCA et al to deal with.
One USMC F-35 made Emergency landing to JASDF Tsuiki AB Japan.
Whatever the issue was, it was not bad enough to force an immediate engine shutdown as the F-35B drove itself off the runway.
Why copy the loser of a competition?
Btw, about the only thing that they “copied” was the general layout of engine location. Everything else from tail config, intake style, wing-location, engine type, gun type, cockpit location, etc was different between the two.
The X-2 did not “prove” anything of the sort, especially on the engine tech or avionics front.
Why would the USG object to the F-35 sale to Japan? They have always been an important export partner, especially in military tech (F-15/16, AWACS, aegis, etc).
That may in fact what LM proposes (ie restart with F-35 avionics). Guess we’ll find out as time goes on.
One thing they need to address is range as the current F-35 easily out ranges the F-22.
It is hard to believe that the USG would ok the sale….
Most of the items that held the F-22 back were avionics in nature. If you threw all the F-35 avionics at the new plane then this would not be an issue.
Almost certainly none
Sales? :very_drunk:
What “Stealth technology” did the F-20A have?
put the 1990s F35 bits into it
The only thing in the F-35 from the 1990’s is the “idea” of an F-35″.
Everything, especially the avionics, in the F-35 is in a constant state of development/improvement. It just got new CPUs with Block 3i, will get newer ones in Block 4.1 (to increase capacity 4x), got new radar modules in 3i (and again is due for newer ones), getting a new EOTS, EODAS, etc.
F-22 carries 8 AAMs and the F-35 4 (likely 6 within 6-10 years).
I would expand the F-22’s bays a little and have 8 AMRAAMs and 4 Aim-9x.
Kinematics is more than just maneuverability, but speed & range too. The F135 engine can be mated to the 2D nozzle just fine.
Think basic F-22 airframe with a little tweaking (slightly larger weapon bays) with the F-35’s avionics and engines.
I think they are thinking kinematics/weapons of the F-22 combined with the avionics of the F-35.