One of the things that came out recently was that there is a C2D2 drop coming this June. I’ll try finding a source.
Lol… For those “they may never get updated” crowd.., 11 have been updated so far.

One thing to keep in mind about the JSOW integration is that it’s the full JSOW-C1 version and not the baseline JSOW-C that was previously planned for 3F. The JSOW-C1 was originaly planned for Block 4.x
Last year’s only mentioned the additional 13 F-35B and not that they were changing the version form the C
The current estimate for F-35 total procurement quantity increased from 2443 to 2456. This is the result of an increase of 13 F-35B aircraft to be procured by the United States Marine Corps (USMC). The increase is reflected in both the aircraft and engine subprogram and results in a change from 680 to 693 in the Department of Navy Aircraft Procurement accounts. The USMC validated this requirement through the Marine Corps Requirements Oversight Council (MROC). The additional aircraft are fully funded and the funding is reflected in the FY 2018 President’s Budget submission. The additional aircraft were added after the completion of the congressionally directed Department-wide fighter mix study.
Thanks for the link. One thing that I noticed is that the USMC is shifting 13 F-35Cs to F-35Bs.
Do you have a link for the SAR?
Mar. 30, 2018: Royal #Saudi Air Force F-15SA (SA-2 aircraft) during a test flight with 12x AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles at #Palmdale. By: Jeff Serpa
Why such a slow rate of production?
It’s the only way to keep everyone employed without running out of orders.
If they built them at a rate that they normally would be capable of, they would have to layoff everyone after a few months then hire new people every few years when they sell some more. This is the same problem that Boeing is having with F-15 & F-18 production lines and LM is having with the F-16 line.
Thanks to Spaz over at F-16.net for this:
Out of the SHADOWS [SIX Page PDF linked]
May 2018 Frank Crébas
…Dogfighting in the F-35…
…‘The F-35 is a very different aircraft, and it took pilots a while to adjust and figure out how to max-perform it. What didn’t help is that until about 18 months ago we were restricted in envelope, which meant we couldn’t pull as much g as we wanted to, nor fly with high-alpha. It was an eye-opener for all of us when those restrictions were lifted and we finally got to see the full potential. Actually, it was an eye-opener for a lot of adversary pilots as well.’The F-35 is far larger than the F-16, and it carries twice as much fuel and three times the payload. ‘Consequently, the F-35 loses energy a bit faster than the F-16 at higher speeds,’ continues Knight. ‘But the slow-speed handling is amazing. The F-35 pilot has the option to continuously point the nose at the adversary, even at ridiculously slow speeds, which is a great capability to have in combination with high off-boresight missiles and a helmet-mounted sight. You need to be careful maneuvering the aircraft at higher speeds, because if you keep pulling back on the stick the aircraft will give you as much alpha as it can, but it will bleed a lot of energy in the process. It’s up to the pilot to recognize when to try to maintain airspeed and energy and when to give that away to prosecute with missiles or guns. I typically tell new pilots that the F-35 sits somewhere in between the F-16 and F/A-18 when it comes to within visual range maneuvering.’
Knight divulged a little more information about flying basic fighter maneuvers (BFM) in an F-35. ‘When our envelope was cleared to practise BFM we got the opportunity to fight some fourth-generation fighters. Remember, back then the rumors were that the F-35 was a pig. The first time the opponents showed up [in the training area] they had wing tanks along with a bunch of missiles. I guess they figured that being in a dirty configuration wouldn’t really matter and that they would still easily outmaneuver us. By the end of the week, though, they had dropped their wing tanks, transitioned to a single centerline fuel tank and were still doing everything they could not to get gunned by us. A week later they stripped the jets clean of all external stores, which made the BFM fights interesting, to say the least…
‘High-g maneuvering is fun, but having high fuel capacity and the ability to carry lots of stores is great too. During the weeks when we were flying BFM we also needed to drop a GBU-12 [laser-guided bomb] on the China Lake weapons range. Back in our F-16 days we’d have had to choose, since there is no way you can BFM with a bomb on your wing, let alone having the fuel to fly both missions in a single sortie. With the F-35, however, this isn’t much of an issue. On one of the sorties, my colleague, Maj Pascal ‘Smiley’ Smaal, decided he would fly BFM and still have enough fuel to go to the range afterwards and drop his weapon. During the debrief, the adversary pilot told us he was confused as to why we went to the range after the fight. When ‘Smiley’ told him that he was carrying an inert GBU-12 the entire time and that he then dropped it afterwards during a test event, the silence on the other end of the line was ‘golden’…”
Source: http://bit.ly/2GBa80a
I see your 4 and raise you 20 :very_drunk:

The Gripen E is about $10 mil less but the Rafale is about $15mil more than the F-35. It’s hard to overcome the Economy of Scale advantage that the F-35 enjoys.
Did anyone notice the contract value given for the Kuwait Super Hornets? $1.17 billion for 28 aircraft.
Sloppy reporting as it’s only the Long-Lead contract, not the entire thing.
The Boeing Co., St. Louis, Missouri, is being awarded an undefinitized contract action with a not-to-exceed value of $1,165,068,022 for long-lead non-recurring engineering required to develop a baseline configuration for the production and delivery of 22 F/A-18E and 6 F/A-18F Super Hornets in support of the government of Kuwait. In addition, this contract provides for long-lead radar warning receivers and aircraft armament equipment. Work will be performed in Hazelwood, Missouri (47.2 percent); Goleta, California (22.3 percent); El Segundo, California (20.1 percent); Fort Worth, Texas (3.2 percent); Bloomington, Minnesota (1.7 percent); Mesa, Arizona (1.6 percent); Orlando, Florida (1.5 percent); Greenlawn, New York (0.8 percent); Deerfield Beach, Florida (0.5 percent); Wayne, New Jersey (0.4 percent); Torrance, California (.3 percent); Stillwater, Oklahoma (0.2 percent); and Minneapolis, Minnesota (0.2 percent), and is expected to be completed in September 2022. Foreign Military Sales funds in the amount of $275,850,901 will be obligated at time of award, none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to 10 U.S. Code 2304(f)(2)(E). The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N00019-18-C-1025).
https://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract-View/Article/1481376/

The Commanding Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 122 (VMFA-122), Lt. Col. John P. Price, conducts a pre-flight check of aircraft in preperation of VMFA-122’s first flight operations in an F-35B Lightning II on Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Yuma, Ariz., March 29, 2018. VMFA-122 is conducting the flight operations for the first time as an F-35 squadron. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Allison Lotz)
I guess that’s one place that you can safely put color graphics on a VLO airframe :eagerness:
F-35 ‘Green Glow’ And Carrier Launch Problems Solved
Landing a fighter on an aircraft carrier in the dead of night is a challenging feat even for the most experienced aviators. But for pilots flying the U.S. Navy F-35C carrier variant, nighttime carrier operations have been made even more difficult by a “green glow” that obscures their …
Rest behind the paywall.
http://aviationweek.com/awindefense/f-35-green-glow-and-carrier-launch-problems-solved
Lol.. The source of that Iran story is higher than a kite. :stupid:
He underlined that the fighter jets can travel from Israel to Iran twice without refueling.