The F-35s have DAS which preclude the possibility of a mid-air collision.
The F-22’s have a similar function in their MLD and are planned to get an upgrade to full airborne detection and tracking in WVR via the MLDs.
I am sure that the F-35 to JAS rear comment was in thermal, not RF.
No surprise there as the F135 is HUGE 😉
The F-35 is most definetly a higher risk… and well worth it 🙂
Excellence can be obtained if you:
…care more than others think is wise;
…risk more than others think is safe;
…dream more than others think is practical;
…expect more than others think is possible.
Howard Schultz
Starbucks Chairman of the Board
There WILL BE unexpected Costs
There WILL BE unexpected Delays
What determines success is whether we wilt under the pressure or stand up, find a solution, and soldier on.
Are you really trying to equate the tech issues involved with the JSF to the Gripen Demo???
True.
English isn’t my native tongue, so I may have expressed myself somewhat clumsy. For all intents and purposes the carrier wave cease to perform its function and by that, I ment “disintegrate”.Cheers, Cola
True…. While I do not know HOW the US radar LPI magic works, the point is that it does.
Waves don’t get “disintegrated”, just weaker.
The only background X-band “noise” is generated by other X-band radars.
From other radars, reflections, drones, ECM, and decoys (MALD, etc).
Now, if the radio saturation is so high or the signal power is so low, that an RWR can’t pick up such low-power LPI signal, than radar’s receiving module won’t pick it up as well, since the signal will melt with background noise and no digital sharpening will do you any good, meaning, you can’t extract a code from within the pulse, because it has been disintegrated.
Ok, true i havn’t study radar technology, or any other military-specific science for that matter, but why is your receivers able to pick-up LPI while the other guys receivers can’t ? and with only the root of the energy at that.
Physics suggest the other guys receivers have the easier job, all things being equal.
The broadcasting radar can detect these signals because ti simply knows where to look. Since it sent the signal, it knows what freq and modulation to listen for.
Think of it this way: If you had to listen to the radio (all freqs) and wait for a 1 second beep, it will be easy if you know what freq it’s coming in on. the RWR does not know the freq and has to scan the entire band hoping to catch the beep as it changes channels.
The sending unit always has the easier job because it knows the freq of the pulse.
current LPI is conceived on a premise which overloads RWR, but not due physical (antenna) limits, but processing ones. Processing limits can be and are enhanced using more powerful computers and more refined filters (both hardware and software) and is a matter of time the LPI will no longer be LPI.
And by that time radar tech will advance further and LPI will be a generation ahead. Radar tech is always ahead of RWR tech.
Today, APG-81 (and btw, movie looks impressive :)) may well be LPI…tomorrow, we’ll see…
Um, no… APG-81 is LPI TODAY.
If we take his words for granted, then the all-singing all-dancing ALR-94 greatly lags behind TRUE detection of LPI capable-radars, even those with well-known characteristics, let alone something foreign. Assuming that in five-six years, every single major aircraft developer will have access to comparable/better technology, it raises a question – what is the ALR-94 good for?
Not going to happen. Where do you get 5-6 years? AESA LPI has been out for a long time and will continue to evolve it’s modes to stay ahead of the the RWR game.
While the ALR-94 is not so good re the F-22/35, it will work wonderfully in it’s intended role.
Here is a good writeup on LPI radars:
http://www.mar.mil.br/caaml/Revista/2007/Ingles/10-Pag40.pdf
Agreed, again.
However, to presume the enemy RWR will simply “ignore” a signal (knowing stealth+LPI aircraft are in vicinity) is a presumption, which is similar to TWS example from my previous post. So, obviously the RWR has a physical capability of detecting emissions and it’s a matter of filtering and data-interpretation that needs to be solved in order to turn LPI to non-LPI.
Cheers, Cola
This is what makes it LPI. In order to track a LPI signal, the RWR has to now process all RF energy at such low levels that it can never check all the background RF that is o the same, low power.
Since each of the hundreds of beams changes it’s freq with each pulse, the RWR has an even harder time with trying to find a solution.
All this extra calculation and false leads gives the launching AC more time to prosecute the mission and defeat the enemy AC.
LPI is a functioning part of the F-22 program, not a “concept”.
I think that part of you misconception comes from your perception that AESA = LPI. This is a wrong concept. I have not seen any docs that equate any European or Russian AESA with LPI (not even the APG-79 on the F-18E/F either).
Additionally, because the LPI signal is broken into hundreds of beams, the workload of the RWR is overloaded and cannot try and process all the low-strength beams.
The F-22 has been doing it for years without a problem against current gen RWRs.
Quite true, but there’s no way the signal can be so weak that the emitting radar can receive it, and the RWR can’t.
Cheers, Cola
The signal can actually be 100 distinct signals (from separate T/R modules). To the RWR it looks like 100 weak signals and cannot be tracked or is ignored. To the APG-81, it is a beam of sufficient strength to form a target vector.
LPI is not new, it has been flying on the F-22 for years and is better in the F-35.
The F-35’s APG-81 has newer T/R AESA modules and a better backend than the LPI AESA APG-77 of the F-22.
The F-35 will maintain it’s LPI modes throughout it’s engagement and will not have an increased risk of detection just because it’s getting a vector.
Look at this Youtube vid that shows the APG-81 doing a scan out to 80nm. Bear in mind how fast teach target’s full vector is determined and that this is with hardware from 3 years ago.
You keep speaking in vague generalities instead of the details.
Yes i know IIR, but heat is heat and cold is cold, aspect will play a huge role in IR detection, just like aspect will play a huge role in radar detection.
The IIR of the Aim-9X Blk2 is generations beyond the 9L and even better than the ASRAAM due to the better computer brains on the backend. Due to the increased computing power and IIR, the 9X will know that the target is turning and will continue to engage. Guidance corrections from the F-35 will ensure that it never looses track of the target. Besides, the AIM-120D will be the primary AAM, not the 9X.
Remember just a simple maneuver can increase F-35 RCS 100 times ?,
Why would IR differ ?.
The seeker also has inherent limitations due to it’s small size.
The midcourse corrections will keep the AAM on track.
I think MALD is such a smart trickery so any air force who can’t buy them will produce their own ASAP.
Agreed once in visual range it won’t work, but are you going to hazard getting in visual to confirm if it was a decoy or a fighter, ending up in a dogfight ?
There are several technologies that make that unlikely. Miniaturized CPUs, mini-turbines, etc are just to name a few.
Or are you going to deplete all your two AMRAAM’s to avoid the dogfight ?
The escort F-35 will carry at least 4 AAMs (6+ with Blk5) internally.
No matter what mode, a radar emitter is detected by the square distance of what it can receive,
and most a/c these days has an IRST one way or another, so i guess luck will come into play.
The APG-81’s LPI radar modes will ensure that is detected long after a similarly powered radar is detected. You need to read up on AESA LPI technology.
IMV AWAC support is going to be critical for the success of F-35 vs Su-27+, only then can it truly play the “stealth” card.
Useful, Yes….. Critical, No.
If both are emitting then the F-3 will be first to detect and first to launch.
If the 27 is being sneaky, the follow-on F-35s (50 miles back) can be detecting with the radars on full power. When they detect the 27s they pass the info to there forward buddies who take the shot.
No AWACS needed.
Yikes…. time to pull up a chair, school is about to start.
Nah… IIRC the all aspect AIM-9L had a hard time to lock on Argentinas a/c in the Falklands, backside is the best spot to aim, and this is as true in areal warfare as in other aspects of life.
The F-35 will NEVER be carrying the 9L. The current Gen of AIM-9 is the 9x. The 9x uses and “Imaging Infrared” (IIR) seeker.
The older 9L only saw a blob that represented the heat source. The new generation of IIR seekers see different levels of heat as a b&w picture. Here is the picture of what the 9x sees.
This gives the 9x to attack from any angle and makes fooling it with a flare almost impossible.

Secondly i seriously doubt short range missiles are equipped or have any use of mid course updates.
The AIM-9x Blk2 has a datalink. Due to shrinking of circuity they were able to add it in without sacrificing any range from the Blk1 version.
I sincerely believe MALD and it’s followers will become a standard armament for any combat a/c.
The US is the only one who has MALD. A few things to remember:
1. MALD is slow and cannot keep up with the launching AC.
2. They are launched ahead of the attacking wave of fighters to act as decoys to lure away the defending fighters.
3. As soon as the enemy fighters get within IRST range, they will know they were fooled.
4. In order for anyone to try and use decoys against an advancing wave of F-35 will have to know that the F-35s are coming and from where. That, is not going to happen.
The first give-away will of course be made by RWR, like any other emitting a/c or ship.
The first giveaway will likely be the AIM-120Ds going active 5 seconds before impact since the F-35 is using a combo of off-board sensors, IRST, and a LPI AESA radar set for target aquisition.
There’s something i’ve been pondering for some time…
IF the frontal RCS= golf boll diameter, then how can the radar radome diameter possibly have a reciever area larger then a golf boll ?
since everything but a total area of 1-2 inch is reflected away at an angle
Or is EM absorbed rather then reflected away ? IF that is the case, then shaping has next to nothing to do with “stealth”
Frontal RCS represents the amount of radar waves that are reflected back towards the broadcasting antenna. Radar waves that come from the front that are not absorbed by the radar set are reflected upwards at an angle. This is accomplished by the fact that the radar dish is permentaly angled up away from the inbound radar waves.