No, they’re real all right. I’ve seen one.
There are these things called ‘books’, ‘going out’ and ‘conversation’ too, apparently.
I do know that, if someone doesn’t know something, it’s common courtesy to explain it to them, not talk down to them as to a little child. As I am your obviously intellectual inferior, consider this thread passed, and left, to you.
‘What does a spectacular over-reaction look like, Daddy?’
‘See above, my child.’
I do know that, if someone doesn’t know something, it’s common courtesy to explain it to them, not talk down to them as to a little child. As I am your obviously intellectual inferior, consider this thread passed, and left, to you.
‘What does a spectacular over-reaction look like, Daddy?’
‘See above, my child.’
No, just let me be the arbiter of it.
Actually, I was rather planning to fill the role of Corrector-General myself. 😀
No, just let me be the arbiter of it.
Actually, I was rather planning to fill the role of Corrector-General myself. 😀
May I remind you of your signature??!!:rolleyes:
May I remind you of the laws of thermodynamics?
All of that heat from industry and towns/cities has to go somewhere, and it comes from human activity.
Look, you’re being led a merry dance.
We all are.
Governments want people who know and/or care enough about this issue to be at one another’s throats arguing about the causes of climate change because otherwise they might be joining together and asking awkward questions about what governments are (not) doing to mitigate the effects of climate change – whatever the actual cause or, more likely, combination of causes.
May I remind you of your signature??!!:rolleyes:
May I remind you of the laws of thermodynamics?
All of that heat from industry and towns/cities has to go somewhere, and it comes from human activity.
Look, you’re being led a merry dance.
We all are.
Governments want people who know and/or care enough about this issue to be at one another’s throats arguing about the causes of climate change because otherwise they might be joining together and asking awkward questions about what governments are (not) doing to mitigate the effects of climate change – whatever the actual cause or, more likely, combination of causes.
Related to Mrs T??? That’s fighting talk, that is! 😡
And I’m really sorry if you think I was talking down to you.
I’ve spoken to apparently sane and responsible people who think – for example – that MPs and MEPs are one and the same thing. Or that Tony Blair was President of the USA. (I promise you I’m not making this up.)
So I’ve learned the hard way not to assume knowledge. 😉
BTW – as I said above, bureaucracy and over-management are nothing new and certainly aren’t restricted to government. It’s just plain daft to pretend otherwise.
Related to Mrs T??? That’s fighting talk, that is! 😡
And I’m really sorry if you think I was talking down to you.
I’ve spoken to apparently sane and responsible people who think – for example – that MPs and MEPs are one and the same thing. Or that Tony Blair was President of the USA. (I promise you I’m not making this up.)
So I’ve learned the hard way not to assume knowledge. 😉
BTW – as I said above, bureaucracy and over-management are nothing new and certainly aren’t restricted to government. It’s just plain daft to pretend otherwise.
Doesn’t mean we always have to put up with it; countries have had revolutions, because of unfair taxes, etc. (USA, anyone?)
Nope, that’s the Tea Party version. 🙂
It had more to do with the lack of representative government than anything else, as snafu352 says.
While certainly grossly unfair to our modern sensibilities, that’s not directly related to taxation and has absolutely bog-all to do with bureaucracy or with the EU.
…..nor that our courts would be made subservient to foreign courts….
By the way…. you do know that, despite the myths peddled by Mister Farage and his ilk, the European Court of Human Rights isn’t an EU institution and predates the EU by decades, don’t you?
British judges and lawyers were instrumental in establishing it, and Winston Churchill ratified the treaty that brought it into being.
Doesn’t mean we always have to put up with it; countries have had revolutions, because of unfair taxes, etc. (USA, anyone?)
Nope, that’s the Tea Party version. 🙂
It had more to do with the lack of representative government than anything else, as snafu352 says.
While certainly grossly unfair to our modern sensibilities, that’s not directly related to taxation and has absolutely bog-all to do with bureaucracy or with the EU.
…..nor that our courts would be made subservient to foreign courts….
By the way…. you do know that, despite the myths peddled by Mister Farage and his ilk, the European Court of Human Rights isn’t an EU institution and predates the EU by decades, don’t you?
British judges and lawyers were instrumental in establishing it, and Winston Churchill ratified the treaty that brought it into being.
Wilful crass stupidity to be punishable by exile to Rockall for life.
Although we’d probably need somewhere a lot bigger than Rockall.
Wilful crass stupidity to be punishable by exile to Rockall for life.
Although we’d probably need somewhere a lot bigger than Rockall.
Doesn’t mean we always have to put up with it.
It’s a fact of life, like death and taxes.
Bureaucracy is endemic in large organisations, and has been so since the ancient Chinese and Egyptian civilisations – and possibly longer.
Doesn’t mean we always have to put up with it.
It’s a fact of life, like death and taxes.
Bureaucracy is endemic in large organisations, and has been so since the ancient Chinese and Egyptian civilisations – and possibly longer.