dark light

Grey Area

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 12,421 through 12,435 (of 12,725 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: East Midlands, ten years ago #636003
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bmused55
    Woah, is that Hunting Cargo a bristol britannia?

    No, that is a Vickers Viscount. The Britannia is a lot sleeker and looks more like the IL18.

    Oooh!! Hang your heads in shame, the pair of you!! 😉

    It’s a Vickers VC9 Vanguard, or “Merchantman” as BEA used to insist on calling them once they’d been converted to freighters.

    I’ll bet you didn’t know there was a VC9 as well as a VC10, did you? 🙂

    in reply to: 777/7E7 possible orders and Farnborough #636451
    Grey Area
    Participant

    At least one of the machines involved went more or less straight from factory to storage – they all found buyers PDQ, though.

    in reply to: "I wish they all could be Caledonian girls" #636729
    Grey Area
    Participant

    God – I remember this!!!! 😮 For some reason it reminds me of the video to “Learn To Fly” by Foo Fighters.

    Nice ladies………….. 😀

    Nice DC10………….. 😀

    in reply to: 777/7E7 possible orders and Farnborough #636839
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Boeing did offset a number of factory-fresh A340-313Xs against an order from SQ in the past (for B777s?), so it’s not entirely without precedent.

    in reply to: HLX at Coventry! #636859
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Oh dearie me!

    The local Nimbys won’t like that one little bit.

    Shame! 😀

    in reply to: Getting wet at Ringway – Day 2 #636865
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I’m usually gone by around 11:30 on a Saturday.

    in reply to: Getting wet at Ringway – Day 2 #636962
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Lots of people, bmi-star. Passengers, relatives, aircrew, groundcrew, etc.

    Oh! I see………

    I will be – and still hoping for some good weather. 🙂

    in reply to: Getting wet at Ringway – Day 2 #636973
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Only very rarely, LBARules.

    in reply to: Getting wet at Ringway – Day 2 #637088
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Last time I flew on a Jetstream I didn’t notice that either side was particularly warmer than the other, RIPConcorde. 😀

    in reply to: Flight International article #637228
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Must be mistaken, then.

    It’s my age, you know.

    in reply to: Flight International article #637240
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Errrr….. don’t Boeing own Bombardier?

    in reply to: Flight International article #637249
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Ah – you’re just playing about then? Again?

    Just read the paper that I linked to………….

    You’ve lost this one, mate. Time to move on now. 😉

    in reply to: Flight International article #637267
    Grey Area
    Participant

    That not what you said here:

    Boeing research, develop and produce Military hardware and Space exploration vehicles. These are bought by Nasa and the US Military.
    A bog standard sale of a product, on a mass scale I’ll admit.

    Where as Airbus…. they receive “handouts” to help fund themselves. They do not produce Military hardware and do reasearch or develop spacecraft. so whats the money for?

    Subsidies are the reason why Airbus are able to sell their aircraft at the prices they do.

    Is it?

    And we’re not talking “affiliation” here – the Japanese government have handed over well in excess of US$ 1,000,000,000 to Boeing to name but one “affiliate”.

    Bottom line: If it’s wrong for Airbus, then it’s wrong for Boeing. Full Stop.

    in reply to: Flight International article #637317
    Grey Area
    Participant

    Oh – surprise! Boeing are whiter than white whilst Airbus are the nasty black-hearted villains!

    You don’t seem to know very much about the way in which big business works in this day and age if you really believe what you’ve written there.

    What about the subsidies that Boeing itself has received from the governments of Japan and Italy in connection with the 7E7 – not to mention the “sweetener” to keep production of that type in Washington State – some US$ 6,000,000,000 worth?

    You may find this paper illuminating – it was produced by two US academics from Buffalo NJ with no connection to either manufacturer. The really interesting bit is Table 2 on page 65 – don’t worry, the page numbering doesn’t start at 1!!!

    And I’ll say it again – THEY’RE ALL AT IT!

    in reply to: Flight International article #637348
    Grey Area
    Participant

    I agree, so long as we’re referring to all subsidies…. including “invisible” subsidies through over-appropriation on military projects, “encouragements” to build aircraft in certain US States and the like.

    They’re all at it……….

Viewing 15 posts - 12,421 through 12,435 (of 12,725 total)