From ADA:
LCA-Tejas has completed total 842 test flights successfully(TD1-233,TD2-261,PV1-163,PV2-83,PV3-75,LSP1-27)
LCA-Tejas Prototype Vehicle-2 took off with the LDP. The flight was flown by Wg Cdr N Tiwari.
Flight International January 1989
So even if it says in 1989 they froze the design that can still be accepted since the definition was completed only in sep 88.That still throws your 83 claim out of the window.
Now I would welcome the History re-writers to dsicredit the Flight Internation and also declare Poject director to be idiot.
As I said before their inexperience made them say that after completing the PD in sep 88 , they could make it fly within 3 years.
And for those “indigenous composite Tech” walas here is Kota hariharan repeating again the composite reality:
Dr Harinarayana is confident that India will be able to produce all the components and subsystems itself. “We might go in for some external assistance for the composite material for the wings and the digital fly-bywire systems,” he says.
Even that is hardly surprising since India didnt have any composite manufacturing base then.
A project start with defining requirement and design it based on that………not what you considered the development of TD.
Project definition was completed in september 88.And that is exactly what it is.A project cannot start before that.
If you are hell bent on re-writing the history of LCA than suit yourself.
And if you are hell bent on not seeing the evidence and harping on the same thing then suit yourself.
Those funds were released to start building the Plane itself not to start the LCA.
Because you say so?
Is it not the case with all the DRDO projects right from LCA to Arjun, each project is started without knowing their own capability, timeline or the funds required. It is not unique with LCA, DRDO sell every project to the govt promising 40% cheaper than Foriegn and can be built indigenously with rediculous budget?
Right!Now i can actually see your agenda.And LCA isnt a DRDO project in the first place.:rolleyes: Its a ADA project with production being HAL’s responsibility.ADA was itself established in 84-85.DRDO is only a subsystem provider.And for every DRDO project which has been delayed there are atleast thrice the number of successful projects.
That si you are basing the exchage rate to current rate, but in 1983 $ was @Rs12 so that makes $466 Million of 1983. You can imagine the value of $466 Million at the current terms.
Still not enough for developing an aircraft from scratch by a country with Zero development infrastructure in the first place.
So PD was finalised in 1988, actual design work on LCA started in 1992, yet the engines to power the aircraft were ordered in 1986? This does not makes sense to me…by this I dont mean that its wrong, rather i do not understand it. Although I know engines can be chosen in advance to test the concepts, but is it norm to choose them years before you start your work on the basic design?
It simply means that the aircraft is built around the engine.You need to start it from somewhere concrete when none of it is decided.And in this case the people thought “okay what good engine can we use”..and they found the F404 and that fulfilled one of the 5 requirements.The first 11 was only there for powering the TDs and PVs.The actual production a/c were always going to be powered by the Kaveri.
PS. BR is not the most reliable source of information for me (personally).
BR is a treasure trove of information.Particularly historical.Even the armed forces officially and unofficialy endorse BR for the accurate and varied information it provides.Most of the articles there are anyway written by members/ex-members of the Indian armed forces themselves.People from BR(non servicemen) have won recommendation by the CAS himself!Plus the articles in the link I provided are written by well known people and people who have been involved in the LCA programme.So you cannot dismiss them by collectively calling “BR”.Hell even articles by test pilots are there!!
In fact any site which allows its members to express hateful and racist comments so openly will fall into that category for many people.
Dont club together BR site and BR Forum.They are different.BRF members(Indians) dont hold antagonistic views about 99% of countries and their people..its only 1 or 2 countries that gets their goat:diablo:
Anyway I understand your viewpoint:) ..but well..no comments.
when did India start any actual design work on LCA?
The actual design and development work of LCA commenced in 1992 and the first aircraft TD-1 was rolled out at Bangalore three years later. Flight control software integration tests for TD-1 began in 1996, with help from Lockheed-Martin of US.
You can actually find much of it here
Quite a lot of money for a country like India back in 80s.
So?Even today 1000$/month is good salary for the average Indian..but it doesnt buy you a car on a months pay!
I dont know the details but this money was probably not just for feasibility studies and setting up the committees but also for establishing infrastructure???
Ofcourse not!I wasnt being very technical there.People who harp about the 1983 date dont know that Aeronautical Development Agency which is the prime organisation behind development of the LCA was itself established in 1984-85.As I said the money was to be used to create that condition where one could plan about development of a fighter aircraft.That definitely includes setting up infrastructure for components to be made inhouse and forming partnerships for components that cannot be made in the country.After completion of the Project definition stage in late 88 , govt review committee was setup on 1989 which reviewed that said condition and gave the green light that yes the ability to develop an indigenous aircraft now exists.money was allocated and actual development started by 1990.
Having said this I have maintained for a long time that LCA project management was not competent enough for such a project (due to their lack of experience). They thought they could run before they had learnt to walk.
In a way you are correct , but the more correct version would be that they had forgotten how to walk after sitting for a long time.After the development of Marut no significant R&D happened for sometime.Departments were closed , technical people moved to foreign Cos(even automobile) and that knowhow was lost.But in the end all of it proved worthwhile.Its still 2 yrs from the time LCA attains IOC but Indian aviation industry base has been formed.In all aircrafts India buys there are multiple Indian components.Several aviation projects are going on.IJT flew in record time.JVs are being signed with international cos for supply of components.So all in all though the effort to re-learn how to walk was a difficult one..but it was worth the effort.
BTW when did India order first engines for LCA?
iirc it was 1986.ADA assessed it needed 5 basic things:the composite wing ,the engine, avionics, glass cockpit and the fbw.The marut experience had taught that India was still far away from development of the engine so GE-404s were ordered straightaway(for the prototype+LSP) and Kaveri programme was launched.Till 1998(before the embargo) about 11 engines were supplied.
You don’t expect the release of full funding from the word go…..in 1983, do you??, The funds were allocated at the same pace as the development. Remember even the Engine were ordered in 1986, in anticipation of flight in 1990!!! How the dates were changed regularly to this day is story of its own.
I find amuzing that in forum a new history of LCA is being tried……, just to understand why is it 1990 or 1993 should be taken as start date?? What is to make of the time b/w 1983 to 1993……..a study???
Ok answer this..what do you think ..a project starts before or after defining it i.e making the project definiton/charter?
In 1983 people thought “hey we should make a plane to replace the Mig-21″And they got allocated Rs 560 crore to do necessary things to start the development.So they did feasability study , formed committees and looked for partners.It was only in sep 88 that they completed the project definition and submitted it for review.And was okayed in 1990 and only then funds given to start it in actuality.The only fault they did was that when they were allocated the Rs 560 crore for all the necessary work they foolishly thought “hey we have the money we could make it fly in 1990”.So you can say that was idiotic thinking , but you have to consider that the actual development started only in 1990.Btw 560 crore Rs amounts to only 140 million USD.
Everything was on paper before 1990.A review committee was setup in 1989 to assess the in house ability.Funding for development was allocated in 1990 and Phase 1 was started.But full scale funding was only given by mid 1993.
The Program
Project definition (PD) commenced in October 1987 and was completed in September I988. The consultant, chosen from four contenders, was Dassault Aviation, France. Engineers, connected with design and development of aircraft know how vital it is to get the ‘definition’ correct. From this flows detail de-sign, construction and eventually maintenance costs.After examining the PD documents, the IAF felt that the risks were too high (likely shortfalls in performance, inordinate delay, Cost over-run, price escalations) to proceed further. A Review Committee was formed in May 1989. Experts from outside the aviation industry were included. The general view was that infrastructure, facilities and technology had advanced in most areas to undertake the project. As a precaution, Full Scale Engineering Development would proceed in two phases. Phase 1: design, construction and flight test of two Technology Demonstrator aircraft (TDI & 2); construction of a Structural Test Specimen; construction of two Prototype Vehicles (PVI &2); creation of infrastructure and test facilities. Phase 2: construction of three more PV ‘5, the last PV5, being a trainer; construction of a Fatigue Test Specimen; creation of facilities at various work centres. Cost of Phase I – Rs.2188 crores, of Phase II – Rs. 2,340 crores. Phase I commenced in 1990. However, due to a financial crunch, sanction was accorded in April 1993 and was marked by an upsurge in work. The critical path in this program has been the design, fabrication and testing of its fly-by-wire flight control system FCS). An electronic FCS is a must for an aircraft with relaxed static stability.
Ho hum…Russian defense complex at Kursk, German fortifications on the Atlantic Wall (Omaha beach anybody?), bunker complexes on both sides in Korea, firebases in Vietnam, Green zone in Baghdad, Kabul, military bases in both Iraq and Afghanistan with large fortifications around them…no you never see large fixed fortifications anywhere do you Jon….
Also Tarawa , Iwo Jima…?
And there is half the problem, how do you know he is for real? you and the dozens of others that hang onto his every word have no way in hell of knowing if hes real or a joker, whats happening i think is you all want to believe his every word so are taking in everything he claims without even thinking about it. Like i say no one in there right mind who is working on whats meant to be Russias most important aviation project would even dream about logging into some chat room and blabbing supposedly classified information – it’d be like signing his death warrent! No one who is an aerospace engineer is going to risk it all for the sake of impressing a few people on the internet!
So somebody on an internet forum is the only source of information?What about the information given by Sukhoi,Saturn,Vympel,Technocomplex,Russian MoD,Indian MoD,Indian and Russian media?All those count for squat?
Actually the fact there are no pictures does say alot about the project.
How do you know there are no pictures?How do you know whether among the pictures available on the net there is indeed the actual diagram or not?
We all know in this day and age new fighter design drawings provide no meaningfull give-aways, nothing can really be gleaned from a simple drawing or for that matter from a large model of a jet, as can be seen with the replica and also from that Japanese F-22 wannabe they were showing off a model of a while back. (i can’t be bothered finding pics sorry). Experts are in agreement that very little if anything can be gleaned simply from a model or a picture
Wait..did Sukhoi bureau say they were afraid thats why they arent releasing the pictures?
yet why are the Russians so afraid to let there white project, there greatest plane ever to be designed from even appearing on a sheet of paper.
refer to answer #1.
Well logic would suggest it is because there is no aircraft, plain and simple as that, not even a final design yet to be able to create a drawing with either when you look at it logically.
So you mean to say that pictures are the ultimate proof of a thing existing?
Or there is another possiblity that like the MIG MFI thing it will have been considered a turkey
So MFI was considered a turkey so cancelled?Please provide proof.
long before its unveiling and be held of from public view for as long as possible to try and save face over the failure.
So J-10 is also a failure because it was also held long time from public eyes?Mig-25?F-117?
Either way though the fact of the matter is logic points to there being nothing at all yet on paper or in the workshop
Similar logic points to that you have no house..because I havent seen it or its picture.
– like it or not thats the most acceptable reason so far as to why you have no PAK-FA
Does it really matter whether we like it or not?
Which one is the blue picture by Zinatullin Rustam:confused:
Russia just hasn’t spent the money and research to fund the PAK-FA to the likely capabilities needed to surpass both American types. (i.e. F-22 & F-35) IMO:cool:
Hey Russia didnt spend that much money and came up with the Su30-35 which are at the level of the EF or Rafale..:diablo:
…or maybe they spent it.Accept it that the Russia we are seeing today isnt the same as the 90s and early 2000s.Several projects are running,new things are being done.Even India is putting 5 bn $ into it.Plus it wouldnt be that accuratecomparing to western standards also.
Exactly my point………..The true capabilities of the F-22 are a closely guarded secret. Yet, we’ve seen picture from day one! :diablo: Russia on the otherhand can’t even provide a simple drawing years after the program started!:confused:
When(which year) did we actually get to see the picture of the Raptor?
Anyway I think its because of this:although the project for 5th generation aircraft was there since the late 1990s – early 2000s(or maybe earlier than that) but it was there only on paper, since the Russian gov didnt have the money to do anything or even validate the technology that will go into it.So it was basically a paper concept.After that with some degree of stabilisation of the politico-economic sphere some of the tech was validated through the Mig MFI and the S-37 so that it became implementable.After that its again in only the last 2-3 years they have chosen and finalised the Sukhoi design.And now is in the process of actually making a prototype.So basically its very early days in the project.