Have you ever done research for Shanghai maglev?
Data in items do not display advantage necessarily.

No difference, but your eyes.

Actually I doubt it too :D. My wording was not correct :o. WS-10G is supposed to have 150+ kN thrusts, but no official sources, just the usual rumors.

The 150+ kn still is suspicious, more tricky pose will be welcome. 😎

In English, the word population reminds me of the only word will be pollution, sounds similar, isn’t it?
Logically, the number of people have nothing to do with innovation or invention.

I’d rather say the WS-10 will be a sort of clone of GE’s F110 more than clone of AL-31.

JH-7
– the first serial JH-7 were simply only wired to to anti-ship missions and dumb-bomb dropping … no LGB’s !
– the updated JH-7 Block 02 and JH-7A featured different radar, which made AG-missions and presision strikes possible … albeit only with Chinese weapons like YJ-83K, KD-88, YJ-91 ARM, LS-500J / LT-2 LGB + K/JDC01 targeting pod.

Flankers
-Su-30MKK (PLAAF) were only delivered with Kh-29T, Kh-31P ARM, Kh-59ME, KAB-500Kr & KAB-1500Kr + propably the Sapsan-E tageting pod … no Russian LGB’s and no Chinese weapons.
– Su-30MK2 (PLANAF) the same but also the Kh-31A AShM m… again no Russian LGB’s and no Chinese weapons.

Again, why the PLAAF/PLANAF did not integrate Russian stores to the JH-7 (maybe the Russians refused to do so) or in reverse why the PLAAF/PLANAF did not integrate Chinese weapons on the Flankers (maybe again the Russians refused to do so) I actualyl don’t know, but it is simply that way.

*** removed by moderator***
The question follow will test you:
Can Su-30 do precise attack and anti-ship attack?
Any POD JH-7 equipped the Su-30 don’t have sth with similar function?
Any sort of weapon the JH-7 has but Su-30 doesn’t?
Is SGW06 a human or just a post machine?

Simply as the high-end part for their strike force especially at a time, when the JH-7 was simply a naval version without any precision strike capability.

After some stupid said that electronics on JH-7 is “far better” than Su-30 series, up to you it changes to no capability for precision strike.

It was cheap in comparison to additional Flankers and in mind of the vastly improved JH-7A with the upgraded sensors and now a decent precision strike capability … even more it can use Chinese weapons, what the Flanker can’t do.
Deino

I still don’t get it what’s kind of sensor or pod that Su-30 series will be unable to load? Too big or too heavy or too complex or too ***** to equipped on Flanker? Don’t you feel too much metaphysics here without specific?

Nowadays the electronics for figher-bomber is more important than their airframes, thats why in PLAAF’s domestic military excerises, J/H-7 consistently out-performance Su-30 in ground-attack missions despite of the latter has agurable an much better airframe.

Out-performance? Why PLAAF still want Su-30MK version then?

Su-24’s swept wing is a outdated design, coupled with its low efficiency turbojet engines make their range considerably shorter than J/H-7, whilst the payloads of the two are estentially the same.

Consider the range, because of dry-wing design, the Su-24 has a sort leg not only comparing with JH-7 but also F-111. But that purposeful design for survivability among anti-air fire-power.

Althrough due to its engine and its airframes, Su-24 may enjoy some higher top speed and high-attitude speed comparing to J/H-7, but none of these advantages matter much for today’s ground-attacking missions.

What’s kind of advantage the JH-7 have then?