Or…the J-20 just has big wheels. If you compare the landing gear to fuselage height, you will find the F-22’s landing gears are much smaller relative to fuselage height than the J-20’s. Human beings have a bias towards thinking taller objects are bigger, even when all other parameters are the same.
The result of smaller gear belong to F-22 maybe the sth go opposite from your wish:D
First step: matching the drawing of side view, to make sure the drawing is perfectly around the real one.
Second step, to make the canopy, gear and wheel are almost same size as J-20
Thus you can see the J-20 is not much larger than F-22.
But, comply with your wish,
Now the J-20 is over 21 meters long.
Actually…if you compare the ratio of the cockpit to the nose, the J-20’s nose is shorter relative to its cockpit than the Su-35s…but these are all meaningless comparisons :P.
Yes, completely meaningless as your wish, an aircraft with shorter nose could be a comparably large aircraft whereas an a/c with long nose could be a relatively small a/c.
Do you want to compare F-5E and F-35?:cool:
Its the low pressure at the centre of the vortex that creates lift over the body of the J-20. If you aren’t at a high AoA, you aren’t creating those vortices and therefore you are not creating lift from the body.
Jesus, body lift, lift body, lift of body, body of lift etc etc……. Omg:D
Doesn’t the body (fuselage) of the plane itself generate some lift without assistance from vortex generators though? Because that’s what I was primarily referring to.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting_body#Body_lift
I copy this for PAKFA at possibly coming day.:p
I saw where did the 38 Square Meter come from, because of misguiding, someone has already followed, therefore we would see a tailless delta wing a/c has 20% more smaller wing area than a normal layout a/c while equivalent engine on size installed.
This discussion is going funny:D
http://xmages.net/storage/10/1/0/2/f/upload/0aa1d8d7.jpg
The 8 abreast MR A2A missile was remembered……
Sign In
