Did you post that post somewhere else and cut and paste the image ?
ha.

I thought I had already told

I did a little analysis at that black board.

I love X-32 also,
a concept that fits more closely to the final eventual mission than X-35 ever hope to be… a true bomb truck.

It is better to know a fighter can be renovated as a good bomber, but a bomber will have no way to return becoming a proper fighter.

The final design with the 4 tail was a travesty and had heavy influence from MD team. they should have just stuck with their guns and went with the original design.

influenced from MD? According my memory, that concept for comepting JSF from MD was a V tail.

emile,

something like the images below? :confused: These are some stuff I collected over the past 10 years. 1st image seems to be the closest I guess, others 3 are quite old and have those 90-degree angles, ventral fins…

Somebody at CDF posted some stuff saying its mixture of the T-50 + F-22 + F-35? Any comments

Dear Friend:
As you told me that 1st image was much closer than others, I don’t know what the time it would be roughly?
but I can tell you this Snow Owl (雪鸮) presented 30 month ago and all of images you posted I had seen at least 4 years ago.
Of course, to be unveiled closet doesn’t mean it will be the determinate proposal. So I did a little analysis at that black board.

You know, without inside detail, simply copy the shape from F-35 is the far far worst thing SAC can do. But we were unable to exclude the SAC had got detailed stuff somewhat from Israel so they changed that layout to be F-35 enlarged version.

I believe you also know the poweplant will be the problem for any Chinese NGF, ergo if not for deck, the square wing like F-35 or even F-18 to be disadvantage for supercruise would n’t be favorite option for SAC, moreover, the SO could be a possible rival of J-20.

cheers