dark light

emile

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 525 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2324674
    emile
    Participant

    Have a Celebration

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2324820
    emile
    Participant

    Mini angle of swept for all.
    And I reckoned that prob is approxi to 1.5~1.75m long.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2324933
    emile
    Participant

    That confused me a lot.
    According to your pic in which scale show me that length of Su-17 does not including prob, but if measureing in terms of wing span from a three view, then the length should comtains prob.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2326269
    emile
    Participant

    😎
    http://paralay.com/TEMP/wse_wmeste.png

    The length data of Su-17 including prob?

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2327611
    emile
    Participant

    I don’t know does anybody play scale model? I do. Hundreds model done by my hand. And the day before yesterday I saw a Su-22 model which gave me an surprised impression: what a big jet it is!
    You guys better to know if merely half meter difference between two jet, which will be very difficult to identified from scaled model, but with one or two meters, if you familar to them then you will easily catch such distinction.
    In my memory, the Su-17 just is same as Su-7 with swing wing and exactly 17meters long. But when I saw that Su-22 model, my ethesis told me, it is a jet bigger than F-16 clearly so I checked the book and internet after I went to home.
    Yes, my instinct is right, it’s a nearly 19 meters long jet, the tolerance depends on whether that pitch angle be measured and what type it is.
    I still remember the height related to Su-17 and mans aside, I also asked friend online to recall and verify it.
    Following, I made a comparsion by height between Su-17 and J-20, the result is if the J-20 merely is one meter longer than Su-17, then it goes funny.
    http://i55.tinypic.com/25yuiw1.jpg
    In this pic at right you can see that epicentral man must 176 cm tall but still doesn’t reach half height of central line of intel, at left, you can see if no jack, that T-shirt man’s height would be same as the top of auxiliary inlet.
    In the pic below, you can see in the pic my assume the J-20 longer significantly almost 2 meters than Su-17, the yellow line couldn’t reach that auxiliary inlet’s top yet.
    http://i52.tinypic.com/2lsxsub.jpg
    Certainly, this won’t reach any accurate data, but only a feeling. What if J-20 really is 20 meters long?
    http://xmages.net/storage/10/1/0/d/4/thumb/thumb_eef0561e.jpg_http://xmages.net/storage/10/1/0/3/8/thumb/thumb_427052c8.jpg
    I don’t know does anyone have any idea about length of I.44?
    In which above, you may wonder, the Raptor isn’t so big. But it is a big fighter, the illusion bring to you by height of that canopy. You also can download pic PS it by yourself, you will find when that J-20 is resized to 20 meters long, its height of inlet and front gear will go smaller than F-22, this is absolutely wrong.
    BTW, all those scaled referenced by subsistant data or what should be, not helmet, because the defractive index by canopy will bring a tremendously error.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2330252
    emile
    Participant

    Exactly!
    http://i51.tinypic.com/2rny5ok.jpg

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2330349
    emile
    Participant

    Here is the more reasonable one:
    http://i54.tinypic.com/2qlzcbq.jpg

    in reply to: Girly J-20 #2338750
    emile
    Participant

    out some Chinese fan work on the J-20.

    J-20 is NOT called Black Eagle in China, and stealth fighters are considered fourth generation fighters.

    Originaly this jet 2001 was called “威龙” in Chinese.
    Certainly, “龙” means dragon. The problem is “威”.
    In Chinese, “威” meaning like what bring to you following:
    http://www.canyouseethesunset.com/uploaded_images/bosstones-medium-rare.jpg
    http://xmages.net/storage/10/1/0/b/3/thumb/thumb_ad05f81a.jpg
    You can pronounce the 威龙 as “Wei Long”.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2338755
    emile
    Participant

    Lol what it shows the LERX extending out the air intakes…? And the canards, air intakes are wrong too…
    Oh and the length of course.

    This is not what you can understand and talk about size, we estimated by a considerably low quality photo enlarged, also that towing truck was accused not exactly same as the truck presented via that web.

    http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/8130/j20av.jpg

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2339659
    emile
    Participant

    A J-20 determination
    http://i54.tinypic.com/24ph0uw.jpg

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2341267
    emile
    Participant

    Dragon maltreats bird

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2342135
    emile
    Participant

    Not greater than F-22 isn’t it?

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2342173
    emile
    Participant

    http://www.mypicturehost.com/images/bf6jk7xzohcpx1nkzncy_thumb.jpg
    Regretably small to carry plentiful fuel and internal weapon.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2342672
    emile
    Participant

    Here is a photo makes me feel funny
    http://www.mypicturehost.com/images/b1jxao50d3x181j06x3x_thumb.jpg
    Cockpit of J-20?

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2342868
    emile
    Participant

    When 峨嵋 Emei turbofan which suppose to be 17~18 ton thrust entry service, TWr for this jet will absolutely overwhelm the F-22. It is amazing……
    beside, the side weapon bay in high postion indicate it contains a much deep height (or a great depth, not broad dimension) for its main weapon bay.
    F-22 is out now!

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 525 total)