dark light

emile

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 525 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: J-20 Thread 8 #2305210
    emile
    Participant

    S raised irrelevant topic after I replied others, and someone are eager to discuss problem about language when his friend will loose gamble.

    dont worry, things could be way worse : thread could be in french :diablo:

    because of my French ID?

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 8 #2305281
    emile
    Participant

    It is mid-night in China now. I get up to correct my English grammar since you are a good teacher for my English.

    The first sentence in my latest reply was wrong.
    If you are not coming to point out the problem, such incorrect sentence will remain in my mind, and you do good for my English. Why should I drop this?

    When I told him he had no idea what is English, I meant that when he blamed my English, he was unaware of that English is not a language with rigorous grammar. I was also not saying my English was better than him.

    Since you flaunt your English certification, let me tell you a story of my English learning online.
    I met a man lived in a small town in England online. I learned many rare English words from him and also felt cordiality of his English. Such cordiality did not come from neglect of my English grammar by him but his English style was much closer to some book like An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations which far far different from fashionable American English we swarm to read. When I invited his comment, he told me American has no idea about authentic English. Certainly this is not his initial words but I remember his meaning. OMG…….!
    Since we had gate opening up, many new words comes with grammar even never seen in our China. Also many arguement concerning Chinese grammar comes by, I have never been criticizing any side of those arguement due to my language certification. Why should my qualification judge it? When I don’t get ones meaning, I would trying, if misinterpretation there is, try again would be what I supposed to do.

    If you think I am instigate English and American, you are so wrong. I am just saying that English is a young language with daily-changing. With years past, perhaps he could not understand my post because he don’t understand English, successor will say.
    Still, I take you as an English teacher, not privately I will not pay you, I said it already and always.

    Now I should go back to sleep. see you around.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 8 #2305457
    emile
    Participant

    What prompted this latest outburst of childish petulance?

    Do not understand what do you mean.
    What are you afraid of? One will loose gamble with me?

    And thank you again for your correction for my English grammar and your correction proved that you’re a genuine English or English is your native language.
    BTW, I had never said anyone’s English is poor but it is a kind of language just like Chinese thousands years ago when no one can say that his grammar is better than others.
    I have degree of our language and I see clearly that your English grammar is closer to ancient Chinese. Maybe the closer grammar is, the better English is.

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2305597
    emile
    Participant

    http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/2/7/6/0519672.jpg

    It’s predecessor wasn’t bad either.

    :p

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/downloads/wallpapers/tornadogr/tornadogr_08_1280.jpg

    http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mayj1nPwSo1r04vbeo1_1280.jpg

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 8 #2305646
    emile
    Participant

    Nonsense! His English is very easy for me to understand. His grammar is much better than yours.

    It’s no crime to make mistakes in a language which is not your own, but false claims of superior knowledge of the language, erroneous criticisms of others who write it better than you do, & childish petulance when corrected, are foolish & distasteful. You are guilty of all three.

    I was not born in English country. However, I can feel the difference of English grammar between a Indian and an English or even an English and an American. I have noticed you joined any avionics topic rather than others in this forum, but you do not understand any real stealth for practical usage, and you’ve already made mistake on this grammar aspect.

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2307374
    emile
    Participant

    F-1 has a very good rate of climb 47.800 ft/min against F-4E 41.300 ft/min and F-16 50.000 ft/min

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_RKBvm9NFwFM/SkrIxqVuHpI/AAAAAAAAABs/tqnMJ-rWA9g/s400/Mirage+F-1CG+jordano2.JPG

    May I have the source?

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2307556
    emile
    Participant

    This one weights 4000kg!
    http://sirviper.com/fighters/tornado/luftwaffe.jpg

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2307675
    emile
    Participant

    http://www.vintagewings.ca/Portals/0/Vintage_Stories/NewStories-C/Lower%20than%20a%20snake/Lowdown48.jpg
    only a man height between wingtip and ground.

    in reply to: Airbrake effectiveness #2307953
    emile
    Participant

    Is MiG-21 the only aircraft with paratactic and tandem airbrake?

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2308985
    emile
    Participant

    I believe that 2200L DTs could be carried under Mirage F.1’s wing as same as F-16I. Maximum wepaon load for Mirage F.1 would be no less 6.5 tons.

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2309451
    emile
    Participant

    Dose anyone know if F-1 could carry stormshadow on the centre pylon I E weight and size if it could it would make the type even more interesting

    Either centreline also inboard pylon.

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2309838
    emile
    Participant
    in reply to: Coningsby Tues inc Display Typhoon #2311405
    emile
    Participant

    Why couldn’t be downloaded your foto by right click in your Flickr?

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2313006
    emile
    Participant

    F-1 has a very good rate of climb 47.800 ft/min against F-4E 41.300 ft/min and F-16 50.000 ft/min

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_RKBvm9NFwFM/SkrIxqVuHpI/AAAAAAAAABs/tqnMJ-rWA9g/s400/Mirage+F-1CG+jordano2.JPG

    Haven’t you seen the image I uploaded? F-4E got 311.9m/s.
    My data for F1 was 187m/s, slightly better than MIG-21
    BTW, who knows the turn rate for Mirage F-1?

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2313618
    emile
    Participant

    The Mirage F-1 was designed as a fighter.
    An interceptor, in fact.

    South Africa requested a modified version, the F1-AZ, that was turned into a strike platform.

    This had additional internal fuel, different radar and avionics, a laser range finder, and retractrable refuelling probe.

    That is not to say that the F1C fighter could not be used in the strike role. South Africa used them in that role initially, and of course, later F1 models were capable of a variety of missions.

    A Mirage F1CZ interceptor loaded with 8 X 400kg bombs.

    http://i1268.photobucket.com/albums/jj563/venoid/MirageF1CZwithbombload.jpg

    A very impressive weapon load in fact. If it was designed as an interceptor or to be used as something like that, we should notice that its climb rate was so mediocre, and its radar was not so outstanding in the initial version.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 525 total)