It’s one J-20. The second one is a duplicate of the first one they put in front of a J-15 to demonstrate size. This is a picture of China’s CFTE (Chinese Flight Test Establishment) at Yanliang, where they do most of their aerodynamic testing for designs.

Here’s the original

[ATTACH=CONFIG]225755[/ATTACH]

In this picture I believe the j20 length is more or less the same lenght as the Flanker

First time i see the radiation warning sign on the LEVCONs, so is confirmed? the -5 is testing the L band radar? it seems they are fixing the issue of poor alitude directionability fitting it into the LEVCONS.

Dint notice the…mirror in the underside of the nose, it seems to be inside the space for the radome, so whta is it?

http://russianplanes.net/images/to123000/122681.jpg

Nevermind, it seems the 054 doesnt have it, still, I´m curious.

The Indian agent strikes again…seriously, I remember the huge MMRCA mess…what is its status? Rafale supposely selected…nothing signed, OK…

Five AESAs, not counting anything they put in the tail.

In the Su-35, too, the Russians have not accepted the field-of-regard limitations of a fixed ESA. That was acceptable for the MiG-31, with a different mission.

These kind of programs are getting more and more expensive, the Pakfa will be a very capable weapon, but is still a very expensive program, with more and more electronics stuffing in it , they will need a new engine, and is very likely this plane will be the most sotisficated regarding sensor fusion, and combat awareness, a very wide field for its AESAs, the LF band sensors, the IR and optic sistems, I think is now ahead of the F35 program.

But is worth to use it as a dogfighter? IMO russians will need a new fighter, even simpler than the F35, something like the Rafale or the Typhoon, with some LO tweaks and a practical LO undercarriage.

16’600kg or more

I’m almost sure the Pakfa will be lighter than that,, but we must remember the F22 is covered with tape and plastiline (in the produccion line you can see the airframe is full of rivets), and we dont know if the T50 will be aswell.

Something official about the “radome” on the tail?

Had the J20 get larger intakes, i had said it was meat for very high speed operations, but now i can see is a stealthier and larger Typhoon, and thats OK.

Instead the PAKFA looks more like a multirole aircraft, with very high performance, like a stealthier Rafale…but with much more bigger engines.

The whole J20’s configuration can make difficult for it to carry very heavy loads, probably many missiles, but not very heavy, like ASMs

While the PAKFA bomb bays are pretty well distributed, and IMO are meant for heavy ASM weapons.

So there you go.