It seems entirely reasonable to ban the wearing of any neckwear in case an irate passenger tries to strangle you with it.
Since Christianity doesn’t specifically require the wearing of obvious symbols of faith , unlike the more definite requirements of some other religions , it’s purely a matter of personal choice. These days wearing a cross is infinitely more likely to be a fashion statement than a declaration of faith.
I think the judge was quite right in saying that this wasn’t religious discrimination.
Sign In
