I believe it achieved that in Singapore trial. It has two 90kN engines and its empty weight is 11 tonne, loaded weight is 15.5 tonne.
You can do the calculation.

u said full weopon load? 90KN is afterburning thrust. Non-afterburning thrust is around 60KN. and how loaded weopon weight is 15.5 ton? 4.9 ton fuel alone makes it 15.9 tons.

As for the 25% weight reduction, that sounds pretty ridiculous. Care to explain how you can loose that much weight?

advance composite materials that were not present in previous flankers. Su-35 is compeltely new machine from structure to FBW to cockpit. it does not share anything with previous Flankers like MKI.

su-35 has better TWR than the typhoon???? That would have to be some kind of a light load. I read that typhoon can supercruise at mach 1.4 with full weapn load.

with full weopon load? I doubt EF is even allowed to fly at that speed with afterburner. Su-35 is planned with 25% weight reduction and increase thrust engine. it will be like F-18E weight wth non-afterburning thrust equal to F414.

http://www.ato.ru/eng/cis/archive/10-2005/defense/news1/?PHPSESSID=edd454556414ccd4d6e4151192a256c6
According NPO Saturn General Director Yuri Lastochkin, the new engine will enable the aircraft to reach the supersonic speed in cruise drythrust mode. NPO Saturn and UMPO plan to launch 117C component manufacturing in 2008-2010. In addition to its use on the Su-35, the powerplant also is expected to power Su-27IB bombers

the problem you and other people keep saying is that you use example from 20 year ago but not current things.

examples are all current not 20 years old.

of course in on time, China have to use many Russian airplane to catch up, but it do not stay like that all the time. If you look now, China do not order much Su-30 like 10 year ago, they do not order as many ship or submrine, etc because now they can do their own. J-10 is only temporary. You do not know, but there is new engine called WS-10 that replace Russian engine in J-10, also new engine will come out for FC-1. in only 5 years China can make a full Chinese version of Su-27 with improve engine (WS-10 is goign to be more efficint than Russian one).

I cant imagine that China can afford to operate more than 300~400 Flankers at this point considering the cost involved.
WS-10 has yet to be proven. wait alteast a year or so for things to clarify interms of operational service.

the logic you use is like this
american make first car assembly line, so they have to be best inc ars now.
but htat is not true
America first to do it but Japan, China and Korea now make better cars
30-40 year ago, China use many Russian tank, but now they use almost only Chinese tank. The Navy no need sovremmy now, because 169-171 is better and stealth.

thats not the logic but illogic Japanese/Korean cars are proven by there Export reputation for long time to much advance markets. there is no such thing with Chinese avaiation. when they start exporting back to russia/america than we can say and not just assemble products based on foreign tech.

With a good negociator and as a “export launcher” customer, between 15-20 (15 if there is a large amout of spare and munitions.

I dont think dassualt can do more than 12 with a billion dollar similar to what offer to singapore. if the newer Su-35 is in contest than rafale is going to lose on technical merits also.

export oriented F-16/M2K/J-10/Gripen/FC-1 are more or less in same class as far as air to air is concerned.

so much technology flow is from one side.

Pavel Tishin, regional director of RSK MiG for marketing Vremya Novosti, November 08, 2006
Question: If you demonstrate your products there this means that you count on something in the future?
Tishin: Of course, but there is one peculiarity: in conversation about the orders from China we should be very reserved because this is the agreement between the two parties. That is why, unfortunately, I cannot tell anything certain about our deeds and prospects. I can only say that we are not going to remove this show from the list of our main shows

i do not see how it lead over China.
You show many Airliner but who is buying them? the world want Airbus and Boning, not Tuploev.

i can count several countries that are buying russian airlines from Cuba to Egypt. and ur own China.

Even Russian buying Boning.

they are very limited in numbers untill there factories speed up to production run.

China alraedy start producing airliners and had built one a few decade ago. Chna hve better marketing power in civilian sector than Russia.

what u are making are assembling of foreign aircraft. Russians alteast take a risk of designing there own including the engine. RRJ is more ambitious project than ARJ-21. just look at new export Su-35 cockpit and than compare ur cockpits floating around.

The bombers you post..when is last time they make it? they are all old left over and all the engineer who make it, no longer work for Russia because Russia have no funding. its technology will stagnate now while China rise fast.

they still have more funding than china. look at basic research.

The economy you have no understanding in. Russia only grow because it export oil and raw resource, all other industry is dead or uncompetitive.

nope. there scientific strenght is there own. not foreign based.

China has much more diversify economy and can afford to feed engineers.
Already China surpass Russia in MBT and IFV, when new Chiense and other engine go into production, J-10 and FC-1 no longer have any Russian in them. WZ-10 show omre promise for attck helicopter than Ka-50

u have very long way to go. Iranian tank engines are Russian. MBT-2000 uses Ukranian. so where is tank export?.i am not even going into other less neutral markets.
I dont think u can make helicopter engines like VK-800/2500/3500.

they can buy roughly 18 Su-35 for a billion dollar. how many rafales can come in this price.