dark light

star49

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,131 through 2,145 (of 3,118 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Military Export News #2547818
    star49
    Participant

    1 division=1battllion=1 battery is the same thing for export.

    Russia & CIS Business and Financial Newswire (Oct 9, 2006):
    CHINA AND VIETNAM TO BUY MORE FAVORIT MISSILE SYSTEMS

    Russia is to supply an additional eight Russian-made S-300PMU2 Favorit air defense missile system batteries, said Vladislav Menshikov, general director of the Almaz-Antei air defense concern, the maker of the weapon.

    “We are fulfilling a contract to deliver eight batteries of S-300PMU2 Favorit missile systems to China, after which we’ll switch to another contract of the same size that came into force recently,” Menshikov told Interfax-AVN at the Defendory International -2006 weapons show in Greece.

    Asked about the contract to supply S-300 missile systems to Vietnam, Menshikov said that the contract had been fulfilled. “Vietnam wants to buy more and we are in talks with its representatives,” he said.

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=30899&page=1&highlight=s-300pmu-2

    if u follow this thread. even battlion is different from contract to contract.

    in reply to: Report:N.Korea performed first-ever nuke test-What's next? #2548095
    star49
    Participant

    So the Russians left Afghanistan because their “holiday-time” was over?! At least they were clever enough to bail-out like the Americans in Vietnam. The other claims are ……… to stay polite.

    Soviet defeat in Afghanistan is big myth. The left Afghanistan in Feb 1989. after putting sufficiently strong government. and that gov collapsed in April 1992 after Russian aid was cutt off 3 years later. they didnot lost even a single city in those 3 years.
    If there was no Sudden Soviet collapse. that government would have stayed untill this point. so ur mixing soviet aid cut off with military defeat.

    in reply to: Russian Military Export News #2549498
    star49
    Participant

    This is in addition the the 9 systems allready sold correct ?? Or have they bought more ?

    a simple babelfish will help.

    Russian weapon does not lose its attractiveness for inozakazchika. As stated the general director of concern PVO – AIR DEFENSE “diamond -Ante1” Vladislav men’shchikov, entered the force additional supply agreement to China of the eight additional battalions of the zenith rocket systems (ZRS) of S -300PMU2 “favorite”. As noted the general director Of interfaks-AVN, at present concern carries out supply agreement into China of eight battalions of zenith rocket systems S -300PMU2 “favorite”. After this, the enterprise will approach the fulfillment one additional the same by the volume of the contract, which recently entered the force. Vladislav men’shchikov emphasized that there are no fundamental problems with the Chinese contracts. All obligations before the customer are carried out in time and with the high quality. One additional example of this – supply agreement ZRS S -300PMU1 into Vietnam. This contract is already completely executed, and Vietnam is interested in the additional purchase of our systems. The negotiations now are conducted on this. Zenith rocket system S -300PMU2 “favorite” is further development of well known in Russia and abroad ZRS S -300PMU1. Basic special feature of system – ability to assuredly strike ballistic targets via the undermining of warhead directly at the interception point. It is also important, that in the “favorite” to 200 km is extended the lethal area with the work on the aerodynamic purposes. According to the estimation of specialists, new Russian zenith rocket system on the majority of the parameters exceeds foreign analogs, including American “Patriot”. “favorite” has one and a half times the long range of action, than the system S -300PMU1, which now find in arsenal of Russian army and armies of a number of the foreign countries. Important special feature ZRS “favorite” is the fact that it easily is integrated into different air defense systems of the foreign countries. “favorite” is capable to strike aerial targets at the distances from 3 to 200 km in the range of heights from 0,01 to 27 km, including ballistic missiles with the launching range to 1.000 km by the physical destruction of warheads at the distances to 40 km the speed of the beaten purposes – to 2.800 m/s. ZRS is capable of conducting simultaneous firing to six purposes with the guidance to two rockets to each target. Rate of fire 3 – 5 s. Let us recall that the concern OF PVO – AIR DEFENSE “diamond -Ante1” became the most important company of Russia by the volumes of the production of the defense production in 2005. The volume of sales was 45 billion rubles by the holding of the production of military designation. Concern conducts scale works on the creation of the weapon systems of new generation, in particular zenith rocket system S -400.

    in reply to: Report:N.Korea performed first-ever nuke test-What's next? #2549981
    star49
    Participant

    Yup, that’s why its working so far.

    It is not working because US hasnt applied power at right place or doesnt want to.

    And irritate the entire rest of the world in the process. An embargo means no oil going out, or did you forget about that part? That’s why you want nations like India and China involved. They have manpower and resources for research with the US into alternative energy supplies. Then you actually can isolate and ignore the Islamic world and not need their oil, and from a more strategic standpoint cause problems for the EU as a result.

    u can pretty much ignore them now establish OIL for Food program for them just like previous Irak but nothing more unless they do separation of state and religion.
    No one can in and out of middleast without US permission.

    in reply to: Report:N.Korea performed first-ever nuke test-What's next? #2550009
    star49
    Participant

    To be truthful, China is the real key to the peace and stability of the world community. If China and India were to set aside their differences and learn to coexist, we could all make some real progress towards a joint resolution of the last serious problem in the world: militant Islam. All it takes is for China and India to sit down over some curry and Tsing Tao and we’re in business.

    US has enough power to defeat militant islam on its own. it does not need China/India/EU. with USN it can pretty much embargo the middleast/south asia combine.

    in reply to: The J-10 / Lavi connection #2550566
    star49
    Participant

    Just a step too far without enough knowledge, where logic is not enough. The hardware alone is nothing, when you do not have proof, to what specifications all parts of that are built. These are several thousand different parts, each are built to an excact specification and a related production process. If all is that easy as some thought?! (Why not hire a labor and some capable chemics to produce a parfume or Coca-Cola f.e. Just a few elements to buy from everywhere, when the specific mixture is the real secret.) A visit in Pakistan did allow to look into every part of intrest really. Inspect every spare-part, benchmark used ones or replaced parts left from repairs or crashes. Look into the documentary of all that parts given by the producer. Read the related benchmark-data and tests about that. You can learn a lot from a related test-program with the real things. Pakistani engineers and mechanics of the F-16 systems can tell you a lot of first hand experiences from over a decade of operations.
    After that decesions can be taken. Are there parts from the system, which our aviation industry is producing in a similar quality allready? If not, are there parts to buy in the open market, which may fullfill the specifications in need (dual-use ones f.e.) Maybe reduced lifetime demands will do at first, when the demanding specifications could not be met or fullfilled in the near future a.s.o.
    With the rising capabilities and experiences gains of the Chinese aviation industry the present FC-1 is no longer the former Super-7 project. We keep in mind that the Pakistani had not much inferior to the own F-16s in mind and the highest intrest to do all, that it may come true. On the Chinese side it was the J-10 at first and they exspected F-16s performances from that. The much more demanding J-10 had suffered some reductions in related technology to get it into the air at first, but it is a tremendous jump in capabilities at all, when we keep the problems of assembling the J-11 f.e, in mind. Without Russian engine-technology none of that fighters mentioned did fly really, before we become too excited about the Chinese aviation capabilities.

    u are mixing past and present. u put 1991 article indicating Lavi transfer. why would some one buy such a design with no hope of building as there is no engine and infrastructure available for building it at that time. (see the Su-27 example from late 90s) at it is not such advance design in terms of technology.
    I already gave example of Mirage F-1 powered by SMR-95. Russians would have given any design consultancy for free just for the sake of engine sale.

    in reply to: The J-10 / Lavi connection #2551542
    star49
    Participant

    Good to read, when you are serious about your statement including the J-10. None claimed that the J-10 is direct copy of the IAI Lavi.

    alteast MIG-23MLD is implying that J-10 is copy of Lavi.

    By the way just another case of evidence, none disputed the visits from Pakastini engineers to the Chinese aviation industry to learn some details about new Chinese fighters. The other way around every Pakistani disputed, that Chinese engineers may have visited the PAF installations to learn some of the “secrets/technology” related to the F-16 f.e..

    by that logic China should have built Su-27 by itself without resorting to license by merely looking at it for years. if Su-27 license without engine is $2.5B. so how much will be Lavi with unlimited quantity and more advanced design (80s vs 70s) as mention.

    in reply to: The J-10 / Lavi connection #2552070
    star49
    Participant

    Why you like to distort things? The IAI Lavi was not a failure, you say that just to justify a senseless theory that it was cancelled due to the lack of good flying qualities and weaponry it had.

    If Lavi was good in real sense it would have existed like
    Phalcon AEW,
    Arrow ABM,
    Merkeva
    Nuclear weopons.
    and plethora of missiles. dont tell me developong active bvr from groundup is cheaper than developing a fighter without an engine.
    infact there was nothing going to be achieved even if LAVI development was completed. by that time IDAF would have already hundreds of F-16 with fully trained pilots and infrastructure. another single engine fighter which is inferior is just waste of resources and limited pilots. money is not even an issue. just look at egypt why it is getting all the aid without giving anything in return.

    I will give you real aspects about the Lavi

    A) The Avionics, radar and weaponry fitted to the Lavi in 1986 were more advanced than any thing the Chinese could fit to any ot their aircraft flying at the end of 1986, this includes the J-8II and the never built J-9 that you talk so much

    B)Since Israel built around 60% of the IAI Lavi, it mostly could help China in the J-10 program with J-10 the airframe, aerodynamic configuration and avionics, it could not power it

    C)What China could recieve from IAI was basicly Israeli technology and some Israeli technology that had an origin in american tech transfers

    niether China or Israel could power the IAI Lavi clone AKA J-10 with a modern engine so they asked Russia to power it, so in fact the J-10 as all the Russian sources claim among them SIBNIA is an Israeli, Russian and Chinese product.

    As a whole the J-10 is a derivative of the Lavi as the MiG-31 is to the MiG-25

    Is israel an independent nation? the answers is yes
    Is Israel obliged to keep agreements with foreign powers? the answer is yes
    Does Israel or any Nation always keep agreements signed with foreign nations? the answer is no

    SIBNIA account that u keep repeating has zero credibility as far as israel is concerned.
    u have to look at soviet union/russia politics in middleast

    in reply to: The J-10 / Lavi connection #2552223
    star49
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Sens]

    MTOW for Block 60s is ~22,7 tons and the wing-load 810 kg/qm.

    i dont know from where this figure come from. LM only has standard USAF block 50 on its website. not even the advance block 50 or the two seaters.

    http://www.lockheedmartin.com/wms/findPage.do?dsp=fec&ci=15053&rsbci=11171&fti=0&ti=0&sc=400
    Stores Carriage Capability
    The current Block 50 F-16 can carry up to 22,000 pounds of weapons, electronic countermeasures, sensor pods, and external fuel tanks on 11 store stations. With full internal fuel, it carries more than 15,500 pounds of external stores at its maximum takeoff gross weight. The Block 60 version will have an even larger load capacity

    For 90% of all missions the usefull weaponsload does not exceed 2 tons.

    provided that 90% of missions are done by very large airforce who have thousands of aircraft to carry out it so aircrafts are not stressed. smaller airforce is different matter.

    So you have no problem to explain, why India buys more MiG-29s.

    because it will be cheaper to buy and they already had very cheaply from SU times. u havent provide data that Gripen or Lavi will be cheaper than F-16.

    By the ways you have no problems to mix different weight fighters for what purpose?!

    u started that Lavi is some wonder single engine fighter that provide capability that is already not present at that time for lesser cost
    i doubt it can even surpass M2K.

    In 1986 there was no SMR-95 available from the SU. Despite that small detail it did not deliver the required thrust-level for the Lavi.

    it wasnt present even in 90s. untill they made for Mirage. MIG even needed small amount of money to survive.

    I see, the Gripen was built with US-money, was it?!

    wasnt arrow built with US money.
    do u serioulsy think US seriously needs that small amount of money from engines so Swedes and India can have there own fighters but not Israel.

    Your running gag, don’t bother someone with data or details!!!!!

    when ur not understaning the whole thing so no point in providing the data.

    in reply to: The J-10 / Lavi connection #2552293
    star49
    Participant

    What are the differences?

    The Gripen has the better fuel-ratio, the better weight ratio , the better lift-ratio and the better related drag-ratio.
    The F-16 has the better installed thrust ratio at low-level.

    ur Gripen advantages are meaningless in real combat between the two
    JAS-39 MTOW 14 tons vs 24 tons for advance F-16 with CFT and dorsal spine. One can carry more and heavier weopons to more distance and that what counts. see the Flanker success vs Fulcrum.

    Just note an engine to install in the Lavi. Cost considerations aside.

    how much it cost for SA F-1 with SMR-95. Israel much stronger economy with great private inflows. if they felt there Lavi gives them any real advantage in combat or export market they would have built it regardless of taking into consideration US money if it was there own product to begin with. US have no problem with Gripen as it also cuts into F-16 sells.

    There was a Chinese A-50 in Lod.

    which proves that Phalcon is indigenous as they dont require advance permission for US parts to be installed on export plane. infact they cannot reveal US product to Chinese even for indepth evaluation purpose as it is itself violation let alone concluding a deal for it and installing it.

    No hard data as always, because you have a personal life, which does not prevent you to post here what?!

    u dont need data for such obvious things.

    in reply to: The J-10 / Lavi connection #2552328
    star49
    Participant

    What overweight do you mean?! Give data.

    compare F-16C engine to Gripen, load capacity of individual weopon stations and internal fuel.

    What engine to buy in 1986 with US-taxpayers money?!

    why they have to buy US engine with US money. If there product is good they can sell it and make money out of it and continue development. by mid 80s Israel was powerful enough to defend its existence and Soviet Union was poor to support any arab adventure against them exceopt for free weopons to Egypt.

    Like the Gulfstream aircraft and the US-funded elements of the Phalcon-system f.e.

    like IL-76

    If I remember well, Israel had to ask the USA for a ‘yes’ about export of the Phalcon-system to India f.e.

    anything that Israel sells to India alteast US is asked or inform. because US has certain interest in stability of that region.

    in reply to: The J-10 / Lavi connection #2552349
    star49
    Participant

    The F-16, the former yardstick in performance still had a hard time to beat the Gripen in competitions. The lower price by similar performance gave the edge for the F-16s, when it comes to the technical base of the 70s compared to those of the 80s.
    The Gripen has a ferry-range of 3000 km like the Su-30MKK f.e.

    Gripen ferry range is with 3 external tanks. It has less weopon stations and overweight compared to F-16.
    and i dont think Lavi was terminated because of money. they could have sourced engine from EU or Russia than than or develop there own and continue development with money they got from China. Just like they have independent AWACS program.

    in reply to: RAF Visiting Gwalior, India #2553334
    star49
    Participant

    6 Erieyes can provide Pakistan with 24/7 coverage asuming 2 up in the air contstantly.

    24/7 coverage on what area? It can hardly look 200km inside India assuming its a little far away from border for its own safety. It cannot detect what is happening at 500km or 1000km where MKI with Air-refuellers will be preparing a mission. at 200km range ur just about ready to launch standoff weopons. MKI+IL-78 is totally different thing than any other single engine fighter with air-refueller. it give flexiblity and safety to mission.

    2 for the entire country on a 24 hours basis can be down in war.

    thats assuming that they dont have ground based radars and fighter radars which supplement AWACS.

    Add to this Chinese AWACs and rest assured, an “aggresive” posture can be adopted with that many resources.

    A non-stealthy F-16 with JDAMs is a sitting duck even for BVR equiped MIG-21. u can only use short range JDAMs either with stealth aircraft or have full air superiority over hostile airspace.

    IL-76 is a four engined turbofan powered cargo aircraft from former USSR.

    these are completely new IL-76 with PS-90. and anyway IAF already have IL-76 in its inventory for transport and refuelling. so they have the experiance and infrastructure to maintain and fly them properly unlike some thing new like SAAB-2000.

    SAAB 2000 is a western turbo prop civilian aircraft.

    Guess which will be easier to maintain and get higher sortie rates.

    it hasnt been proven yet.

    in reply to: Raptor vs S-300/S-400 SAM #2553970
    star49
    Participant

    The S300V is currently being marketed to India to be the cornerstone of its proposed countrywide ATBM system, though they seem to be more interested in the S-400 (if its available) plus their favourite Arrow ATBM from Israel, which cannot be acquired unless the US allows for it.

    if u read the whole article. S-300V is already outdated and compromised to certain extent. its replacement is Antei-2500. and they consider it best among ATBMs. now where marketing to india is mentioned.

    in reply to: Raptor vs S-300/S-400 SAM #2554662
    star49
    Participant

    interesting story.

    http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20061003/54490651.html
    Buying and unlocking secrets

    How did the United States finance Yefremov’s efforts to develop the Antei-2500 system? That is a good question.

    The cash-strapped NPO Antei and its partner, the Russian Defense Ministry, were unable to pay their employees in due time, to say nothing of developing new weapons. But science-and-technology ideas cannot be stopped no matter what. NPO Antei experts realized full well that they had to predict the long-term development of weapons and military equipment in line with the Russian Army’s current and future requirements.

    NPO Antei executives had to find money to implement new R&D projects. Excuses that the Russian authorities failed to provide adequate financing at the time would seem naive. In this seemingly hopeless situation Yefremov suggested a way out.

    He ventured that the Defense Ministry and the Rosvooruzheniye state-owned arms exporter (now called Rosoboronexport) sell an S-300V SAM system to the United States. His offer was motivated by the fact that the CIA had been trying to lay its hands on the S-300V for a long time. Raytheon Company, which was upgrading the Patriot system, had to study all S-300V components in detail in order to accomplish the required objectives.

    Yefremov contacted some high-ranking generals and asked them for help; but they apparently thought he was out of his mind.

    At that time Moscow was trying to sell an ancient S-300-PMU system developed by rival company NPO Almaz, headed by member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Boris Bunkin, to the United States via Belarus. The local press raised a fuss in connection with the sale of Russian secrets by way of Minsk.

    However, the S-300-PMU sale amounted to a skilful disinformation campaign because that system could only hit enemy aircraft. Moreover, the United States received only its control-and-guidance elements, which had been scavenged by shepherds for non-ferrous and precious metals, from the Emba testing range in Kazakhstan. But the press said nothing on this score.

    China bought four battalions of the more advanced S-300-PMU-1 system from Russia, and experts said cooperation would continue. Beijing, which had begun to deploy a national air-defense system, needed several dozen more S-300-PMU-1 complexes. This meant that the Russian defense industry and other sectors would receive additional investment. However, a Russian-U.S. S-300V contract could have delayed this prospect for a long time.

    A question immediately arose why the Pentagon and Beijing were buying different systems, and whether Russia had deceived China. The generals told Yefremov that the S-300V was a reserve element of Moscow’s air-defense and ABM systems, and that they could not risk divulging its secrets. They said it was impossible to allow the United States, which Moscow did not completely trust, to learn such secrets.

    Yefremov tried to convince them that it would take over a decade to solve the secrets of the S-300V system’s control-and-guidance elements, and that Russia would develop an even more powerful and effective system by that time. He also said that NPO Antei, which was the only ABM weapons manufacturer, the Yekaterinburg-based Novator design bureau and affiliated enterprises would go bankrupt unless Moscow sold the S-300V system to Washington.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,131 through 2,145 (of 3,118 total)