Su-27SM has 4000km range. Su-35 with highpowered engines is 3600KM with 4 missiles. with airrefuelling range of 6500KM. Now there is 2500L/3000L external tanks for Sukhois. This shows how much they are emphasis on range.
and there is no mention of any new fighter in budget untill 2015. The performance gap between Sukhoi and MIG is increasing day by day. It will take massive financing for MIG to reach Sukhoi quality and experiance now.
Algerian already found of Su-30MKA and i doubt they will go with MIG-35 two or 3 years down the line when u have superior IRKUT built product in hand. (factory is Airbus parts already certified and preparing for MS-21 with black wing).
The only reason this MIG future is mentioned becuase there is that IAF tender which will drag this issue in media.
USN doesnot have to worry about Su-35/PAK-FA.
First they will be too expensive for export customer for obvious reasons.
Second they will be downgraded.
Third the operator cannot achieve the level of training, numbers along with support equipment at one place at one time.
Physically Su-35 can run away from F-18E but not the otherway around. Just the internal fuel and flight performance difference simply huge.
you clearly have no clue how modern J-11B is
so u post a link to factory site.
Actually, the tooling in the Chinese aircraft factories are much better than the Russian ones. Most of them are still using the Soviet era ones. But for some reason, the Russians still manage to pump them out in good quality. Says a lot of good things about the skill of the Russian work force.
from where this tooling information comes from? how they built SSJ, Su-35 and Su-34. show me the picture.

you are not saying much.
Use of the phrase “far more advanced” at this day and age should only be applied on 5th generation fighters.
by what sense is it that much more advanced. Have you seen what J-11B will be in 2 or 3 years when su-35 will really be ready for mass exports? Does su-35 use fiberoptics cable for communication? what kind of databus standard does it use? What kind of newer generation AAMs will actually be ready by then for the Russians and for Chinese?Face it, you know very little about J-11B.
Su-34 has multiplex channels and level of avionics offered with MIG-35/Su-35are well known. China hasnt graduated from medium tech level. It is practicall 5thgeneration avionics on 4.5 generation airframe.
http://www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/military/Su-35/
The distinctive feature of Su-35 is the employment of a new suite of onboard instruments. Its core is the information management system (IMS), which integrates functional, logical, informational and software subsystems into a single complex that ensures the interaction between the crew and equipment. The IMS includes two central digital computers, commutation and information devices and an indication system built on the “all-glass cockpit” concept.
The core of the Su-35 cockpit instrumentation suite are two full-color multi-function liquid crystal displays of MFI type, a multi-function panel with a built-in display processor, a wide angle collimatory display on the windshield and a control and indication panel.
To further clarify matter. $375m worth of microchip/memory products Radar and aerospace products were supplied last year from Sitronics.this does not even include another fab. Angstrem on 130nm process.
and next year they are going to 65nm for Miliatary use also. so can u point out anything similar on Chinese side and that include TSMC(taiwan) what is there military contribution?The amout and process for Military purpose?
http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.asp?n=1&neID=20080514560.2_1c5c08c72c7c591f
The Radars and Airspace segments’ revenues increased by 36% year-on-year to $168 million in the fourth quarter, and by 50% to $375 million in 2007 as the result of an increase in the [bolimar] services performed on a number of government contractsAnd possibly same questions regarding the construction of a 0.6 nanometer plant in Zelenograd. So I wondering how much do you plan to invest at this year and next year, and when do you expect first revenue from the project? What’s the IRR on this project?
Also, regarding this microchip facility, can we please confirm that this facility will not be allowed for the military use? That is what I was told at Sitronics. So they told me that this technology is for civil use only. Thank you.
ALEXANDER GONCHARUK: (interpreted) Thank you for your question. It is too vast; that will require three days to answer this question, but we will try to get it in three minutes.
First the simpler question. The plant which is to be constructed in Zelenograd for (technical difficulty) nanometers production, chip production, is intended for both military and civil purposes of products.
NADIA GODREVA: Sorry for interruption (spoken in Russian). Yes, sorry for interruption, but I’m specifically asking about whether it will be allowed for military.
ALEXANDER GONCHARUK: (interpreted) Part of these products will be for military purposes, as ordered by state. But the predominant part will part will be civil production.
this very intersting bringing back An-70. Now if all An-124/IL-476/An-70/IL-214/IL-114 are put together. u have widest product range for transport from Military to Civillian.
Russia’s military transport aircraft can remain operational for another 30 years – commander
MOSCOW. May 28 (Interfax-AVN) – The State Defense Acquisition does not satisfy the requirements of the Military Transport Aviation for new aircraft, Lt. Gen. Viktor Kachalkin, MTA commander, has said.
“The latest aircraft were supplied as far back as 1992,” he told the Krasnaya Zvezda daily, noting that the in-service aircraft are still in very good condition and can remain in service for another 25-30 years.
“We are planning a profound modernization of the fleet of Il-76 and An-124 Ruslan in service. Their airframes are brilliant, and what we really need is the upgrade of avionics and possibly engines,” Kachalkin said, adding that need for An-124 services is high in Russia now.
“Although the Armed Forces have been reduced, Russia still has a vast territory, which means that large military units still have to be airlifted rapidly to large distances. Ruslans fit the job best,” he said.
Moreover, he said, there is a need for the Russian-Ukrainian An-70 too. “We shall not drop the project. If the defects, which we revealed during the tests, are managed, I believe that the aircraft can have a very good future,” he added
http://www.royfc.com/acft_news.html
Russian Aircraft Builders Were and Will Remain Primary Partners of Ukrainian Aviation Complex ANTK Antonov — Dmitriy KivaRussian aircraft builders were and will remain primary partners of the Ukrainian ANTK Antonov aviation complex, this company’s general designer, Dmitriy Kiva, reported. He is taking part in the 9th international ILA-2008 aerospace exhibition.
“One of the main directions of our cooperation is interaction with the Ul’yanovsk Aviastar-SP plant in the manufacture of the AN-124-100 “Ruslan,” Kiva emphasized. Joint operation with the Volga-Dniepr company is evolving successfully. The most important topic of this cooperation is the provision of transportation. Among the priority projects, Kiva named the AN-148 short-range jet airplane.
Cooperation is evolving on the An-140 airplane with the Samara Aviation Plant. “These airplanes already have being exploitation and have a great future in Siberian regions,” Kiva emphasized. “We are working successfully with one of the leading Russian defense enterprises, the Novosibirsk Chkalov Aviation Production Association, on the An-38 airplane, and also with the Omsk Polet aerospace association on the An-3 airplane,” Dmitriy Kiva emphasized. – Close cooperation is continuing with a whole number of instrument building and motor plants and with Russia’s institutes along various lines.”
Dmitriy Kiva expressed hope for the resumption of work with the Russian partners on the program for creation of the short takeoff and landing An-70 wide-bodied military transport airplane. “I am certain that this problem will be resolved positively, and our Russian partners will be participating in the realization of this program,” he said.
Source: 29.05.08, ARMS-TASS
Are you kidding? They got the capability to to build much smaller airbone radars than the A-50 one… Basically, even the MiG-31 can act as a kind of AWACS. And Sukhoi is working on UAV-based early warning systems as well. I mean, they mastered multi-clustered phased arrays a while ago, you know…
Smaller radar making capability does not necessary means introducing Saab/Hawkeye class platform for airforce. when radars becomes powerful enough fighter radar will take place of smaller awacs.
Really where?
http://www.knaapo.ru/eng/products/military/SU-35.wbp
number, pcs 2
thrust, kg 14,500
Maximal fuel load in internal fuel tanks, kg 11,500
Maximal combat load, kg
clearly written 11,500KG.
Really where? Show me.
Clearly written 4000hrs.and it is updated figures look at the speed discription.
http://www.pac.org.pk/amfsite-final/jf17specifications.html
JF-17 airframe is made of semi-monologue structure
High strength steel and Titanium alloy adopted partially at some critical places.
Max speed: 1350 KPH (Mach 1.8)
JF-17 aircraft would be designed, tested and proofed against the requirement tailored for MIL-A-8860 and Chinese National Military Specification GJB67-85
The desired fatigue life of the JF-17 airframe is 4,000 flight hours or 25 years
The period to first overhaul would be 1,200 flight hours
Lose how? You can’t even manufacture sellable products. You don’t even have 300mm wafers. You got less than 1% of the semiconductor market. TSMC mades nearly double in a quarter of the entire Sistema makes in a year, and has a three year plan to build more foundries at a cost of total of at least $14.7 billion. How many years does it take for Sistema to make that kind of money what TSMC has for chump change?
You are nothing but a cockroach trying to compete with elephants.
http://www.eetimes.eu/199700781
http://article.wn.com/view/2008/05/06/450mm_wafer_coming_in_2012/
http://article.wn.com/view/2008/05/15/AMD_to_outsource_more_CPU_production_to_TSMC_report/
ur 300MM fab is built on imported components. U dont have science behind it.
It is contract manufacturing. Sistema owns MTS Mobile. that alone has sales of $20B. First u buy your consumer division throught out Eastern EU, India and ex CIS and later own build manufacturing capacity to supply to your own divisions. It is not depended on outside customers.that will squeeze u for every dollar.
i am not even going into defence sales which are not even included. Just space industry components are in billions.
This show the true state of R&D.
http://www.samsung.com/uk/aboutsamsung/companyprofile/researchanddevelopment/CompanyProfile_Global_RD_Network.html
Moscow SAMSUNG Research Centre (SRC) Optics, software algorithms and other new technologies
SAMSUNG Electronics (China)R&D Centre (SCRC) Software, digital TVs and MP3 players for China
Why would would Russia needs its own money in car manufacturing or car imports from China when West is going to build everything for them.
http://www.rusnet.nl/news/2008/03/21/businesseconomics01.shtml
Renault was looking for a way to expand beyond its Moscow plant. The French company’s strategy director, Jacques Verdonck, met with Avtovaz management in Moscow in April 2006. Among the attractions Renault saw: well-trained but relatively low-paid Avtovaz engineers and a network of in-house parts affiliates.While most Western car makers long ago shed their parts operations, Avtovaz’s vast factory in Togliatti, 600 miles south of Moscow, still has a foundry crisscrossed by trolleys carrying molten steel to forge engine blocks. That’s important because foreign auto makers that have built plants in Russia are scrambling to find parts suppliers to feed them. Renault saw that Avtovaz would offer instant capacity. For Western auto makers, building cars inside Russia is preferable to shipping vehicles in, because of stiff tariffs Russia imposes.
Oh dear. Where to start?
Firstly, Chinese creativity. Already addressed. Secondly, workforce. It’ll probably take ten years to soak up the rural underemployed, the rustbelt unemployed from Manchuria, etc., & the remaining overmanned state enterprises, & when that’s finished, there’ll still be immense scope for improving productivity, as much of the workforce is – and is likely to be for some time to come – working at very low productivity levels. Education levels are rising, skill levels are rising, investment in education & skills is rising, investment in new design is rising
Chinese economic growth will slow from its current hectic pace, but there’s no immediate prospect of the economy “going south”.
It is certianly not 90s.
There is process called reverse globalization that has started not because of regulations but due to rising cost of transportation and materials. every country will built manufacturing capacity nearby.
http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSL2656867920080526
Russian steel companies, with cash to burn from record profits, have accumulated almost 10 percent of the steelmaking capacity in the United States, betting the world’s largest economy will ride out a global credit crunch
China would not be able to send steel to US with time giving huge profit margin to russian companies. they figured that out in 2004..
Moreover rising labor cost along with energy and material will slow down Naval buildup. At most China can afford One aircraft carrier. And certainly it cannot offord fleet of Supersonic bombers, Strategic transports in hundreds. Neither can it build by themselves or afford to buy it. just look at titanium and aluminium price. Sukhoi/Illysin/Antonov/Tupolev will have price and technology advantage.
Bull. The plant is certainly not under license, especially when KnAAPO was so proud advertising that the most automation they have in making their aircraft was a pneumatic hand drill.
where you get this information. again baseless specualtion. where u got those centrifuges in 1992 just like now.
Well China does now and the technology has been learned. That’s why the most the Chinese will buy from Russians are token save-the-face deals like buying some 4x4s.
than u wont need 1960s era helicopters to assemble. Those Jeeps are armoured not civillian version. let wait and see. who blinks.:)
What a joke. prove it.
why u need proof for some thing on knaapo website
Really which web site? Show it. From what I know they want the airframe lifetime requirements to match that of the F-16.
life time requirement of F-16? where this comes from. It is official website with 4000hrs. Not ur speculation.
[quote]
LOL. AMD manufactures chips with the help of TSMC, which is now starting to produce at .45nm (China SMIC is now 0.9nm going to 0.45nm, Russia has not even begun at the 0.9nm). You are just planning to build 6″ wafers, SMIC is now doing 12″ wafers. TSMC manufactures for nVidia while UMC makes for ATI, both ATI and nVidia are companies with very strong Chinese connections (their founders are), and their GPU designs are so advanced that NASA is taking a look at them for potential supercomputer applications. Yeah, your gaming chip is doing teraflops.
I posted certain links that were deleted becuase of that Hyper complaining. It shows whole sale transfer from outside. ultimately u will lose in 450mm sector as cost of going beyond certain point is unaffordable unless u have certain mtheos.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/display/20080527063855_TSMC_Predicts_Chip_Price_Increase.html
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. on Tuesday said it may raise prices of high-end chips it makes due to increasing oil prices, inflation and necessity to invest into next-generation production equipment
Your Sitronics/Systema is acquiring companies but what you don’t know is that they’re using bank loans to do it. Which puts them more into debt.
They will not go under as the are the front end of Russian government for leapfrog others in technolgies. they arent only for selling on retail. they can always increase the price of natural resources around the world.
11.5 tons internal fuel capacity? That’s bull****. Cite sources
Read and digest.:p
http://www.knaapo.ru/eng/products/military/SU-35.wbp
Maximal fuel load in internal fuel tanks, kg 11,500
Sorry but the FC-1 has at least 6000 hours, while Russians never live up to their specifications by at least 25%. Actual life of AL-31F is only 750 hours, despite 1000 flight hours spec’ed.
sorry ur top export customer put on website that aircraft is designed for 4000hrs.
http://www.pac.org.pk/amfsite-final/jf17specifications.html
The desired fatigue life of the JF-17 airframe is 4,000 flight hours or 25 years
The period to first overhaul would be 1,200 flight hours
LOL. The IPO of any Taiwan fab manufacturer is a lot LARGER than sitronics.
Sitronics is a midget compared to TSMC, which has quarterly sales of over 2.75 billion US dollars, while the entire Sitronics has annual gross revenue of 1.6 billions. That’s yearly.
Look at the acquisition is of Sitronics parent company Sistema in ten countries. Sales revenuse never show the powers behind the acquisition strategy. AMD only $4b of revenues untill recently but it is far advanced than anything Taiwan can come up with because they are serving the bottom part of contract manufacturing and that was learned from HP and TI. nothing develop of its own.
And later, the Russians were surprised that the fit and finish of Chinese made J-11s were superior to their own, citing the superior machine tools the Chinese were using. Later KnAAPO wanted to upgrade their tools.
Not only the aircraft is underlicense but the plant is also under licence so how do they know u can do better:)
http://www.royfc.com/acft_news_old_apr1.html#14apr
General designer of the Sukhoy holding company, Mikhail Simonov, talked to Delovoy Vtornik
-“Not yet. I will cite an example of our international projects. China has request we help in erecting an aircraft factory. We have issued all the documentation for rigging and equipping according to an inexpensive and the best scenario. So: the Chinese always have selected the most modern solutions. They have not regretted the moneys for new technologies. They built a brilliant plant under our license. Today a similar deal is being discussed with India. Su-30MKI fighters will be produced there.
You basically cannot make a medium tech fighter by your self so starting from J-10 to J-11- L-15 To ARJ-21 to FC-1 everything is from outside and it is proven by official sources in various countries. I am not even going into entire history.
http://www.pac.org.pk/amfsite-final/jf17.html
Chengdu was selected as primary contractor and the Russian Mikoyan Aero-Science Production Group (MASPG) was contracted to provide the Klimov RD-93 turbofan engine and design assistance too.
Obviously, it’s not just the local market they have in mind especially in the longer term.
So in long term only imported avionics can make the aircraft internationally acceptable. Judging by implementation and obsolete design of aircraft. i doubt it will see huge international sales for long time to come.
For a moment, I thought you meant AMEC is a german company.
Nope. i was looking at production equipment for 65nm to 45nm fab process. not in the process itself.
We are talking about chip design here – not how they are going to be manufactured.
we are talking about semiconductors and the amount of scientific contibution to this field and that incluedes basic research, chip design, fabless firms,fab equipment. and the contribution to global level not assemblying $10 stuff underlicense built on imported equipment.
Except for the internal dimensions. Il-76 cargo box is narrower & lower than an A400M, which stops it carrying some of the loads desired by W. European countries. A400M was built around those cargo box dimensions: they’re not an optional, “nice to have”, feature.
An-70, on the other hand, has the right internal dimensions. . . .
A nice diagram comparing C-130J, C.160, A400M & C-17.
The C-130/C.160 comparison is quite instructive: it shows how the Transall was designed to carry the same size loads (albeit over shorter ranges), nicely illustrating the design priorities.
First they are comparing Old IL-76 data. Newer one can carry 40 tons to 6400KM. u can change the shape of boxes with longer lenght than width and height.
IL-76TF has same performance as C-17Globamaster. And for oversized cargo you need newer AN-124-150M. which is still priced lower than A-400M.
IL-76 also has 850KM/hr crusiing speed. A-400 is i think 40% slower.
http://www.ilyushin.org/eng/products/cargo/76tf.html
There is no point in carrying only 20 tons cargo for longer distance at slower speeds that will increase the turnn around time. A-400M is regional cargo aircraft in similar class as MTA.
From the marketing point of view, it’s certainly a better strategy to opt for western avionics. Not everything is about making things locally even if you are able to.
when your selling primarily locally there is no point in outsource avionics inlcuding LCDs. and there is whole host of issues with this project to takeoff the ground in reasonable time.
It seems you are not reading the postings here. From what I gather, it says AMEC is a leading-edge semiconductor equipment manufacturers. So it’s not like they depend only on imported manufacturing equipment.
ofcourse i am not reading. it is this company that built for Acer and 300MM fab for Taiwanese and it is German. The same company is contracted by Russian for there own fab design and construction.
http://www.mw-zander.com/hld-index/hld-projects/hld-proj-bybusinessunits/hld-proj-bybusinessunits-feelectronics.htm
Manufacturing electronic passport and smart cards? Isn’t this the norm nowadays?
which PC assembler can do it without importing equipment and skill stuff.
In the same way you are inferring the same to a whole lot of other PC manufacturers. I think you should learn some courtesy not to post too much rubbish here.
certianly i didnot bring PC assembler issue. It was brought in context China is doing similar what Soviet Union like always copying, learning stuff from West. Which is not the case. here is something GaNs story.
http://www.compoundsemi.com/documents/view/news.php3?id=9308
TDI Celebrates Ten Years of Pioneering GaN Technology
Jo Ann McDonald – Founding Editor
November 27, 2007…When Vladimir Dmitriev started Technology & Device International Inc. (http://www.tdii.com) ten years ago, few were in the bulk GaN game with an eye toward producing viable, commercial product. With his seemingly unorthodox method of growing GaN and AlGaN single crystal material, some didn’t take TDI all that seriously. Fortunately, the USA government did and Vladimir’s HVPE growth method has been funded by SBIR funding from agencies, like the Missile Defense Agency, ever since. Those of you who have a tendency to march to a different tune as a means of making their own pioneering contribution to the compounds might just learn something from Vladimir’s success story.
Actually when u read this news they are actually buying semi-conductor manufacturing equipment. If these can be produced in China/Taiwan why some has to create a Subsidiary in Switzerland and paying underhand money to get the equipment. It means these equipment is not produced elsewhere.
http://www.semiconductor.net/article/CA6473584.html?industryid=47306&nid=3572
Russian Holding Company Buys Altis Semiconductor
Altis, an Infineon and IBM joint venture since 1999, manufactures semiconductor components for communications, automotive and security applications in 130 nm and above technologies. The site manufactured ASICs and other logic devices, and was a base for the IBM-Infineon MRAM development effort.The companies said that Infineon and IBM agree to license key manufacturing process technologies to AES for use by Altis in the future. AES plans to use the Altis facility to manufacture European- and Russian-designed products, and will open a semiconductor design center at the Altis location at Corbeil-Essonnes.
for your convenience i will post it again all material at one place. since connection between Su-47, PAK-FA and composite materials.
AVIATION
Russian fifth-generation combat aircraft to be built of materials tested on Berkut
MOSCOW. May 5 (Interfax-AVN) – The first fifth-generation fighters will be made of composites tested on the SU-47 experimental aircraft (formerly S-37 Berkut), a competent source in the Russian defense industry told Interfax-Military News Agency Monday.
“The first fifth-generation fighters are to be built of further developed and upgraded composite materials of the type used in the SU-47 experimental aircraft,” he said.
The source said that, for example, the composites that the wing panels of the SU-47 are made of have been tested thoroughly, and the designer of the future fighter knows they will work well.
However, he went on, the technology of the production of the SU-47’s wing panels has been poorly automated and still requires much manual labor.
“The production technology should be upgraded. The serial production of the fighter has to involve new materials, and the automation level of the production technology should be much higher for lower labor intensity and production cost,” the source said.
He also said that the Russian Aircraft Materials Institute (VIAM) was working on new materials for the fifth-generation aircraft engine.
“VIAM does this in close cooperation with the Central Aircraft Engine Production Institute that has inspired the creation of the engine. For example, it is necessary to make a high-curvature wide-chord working blade. The problem is not only to produce the blade, but also to tailor the material it is made of. The whole production process is to be automated,” the source said
AVIATION
Russian R&D institute starts working out new composite materials for 5th generation fighter
MOSCOW. April 30,2003 (Interfax-AVN) – The All-Russian R&D Institute of Aircraft Materials (VIAM) has started designing composite materials for the fifth-generation fighter, a competent source in the Russian defense industry told Interfax-Military News Agency on Wednesday.
“The future composite materials most have advanced strength and rigidity specifications, as well as advanced heat stability. These parameters must be better by about 30 to 40 percent,” the source said.
According to experts, composite materials will amount to about 30 percent of the total weight of fifth-generation planes and aircraft engines. Specific weight of new composite materials is four to six times as low as that of steels and 1.5 times as low as that of alumunium alloys, the source said.
“The composite materials being designed for the fifth- generation aircraft engine withstand the temperature of 400 degrees for a long time. The blades and entire screw as well as first blades of the compressor can be made of these materials,” he said.
VIAM has received the largest order for designing new composite materials from the Sukhoi military aircraft corporation that is responsible for designing the fifth-generation fighter, the source noted.
In addition, one of the major agreements that have been concluded deals with certification of the TU-334 passenger plane.
VIAM is also working with the Aviadvigatel JSO based in Perm to improve the PS-90A aircraft engine and create its PS-90A2 variety with advanced noise specifications.
“New materials must provide for the aircraft engines’ compliance with noise requirements of Chapter Four of ICAO Annex 16 and for creating the research and technical backlog to ensure compliance with Chapter Five of this annex that is yet to take effect,” the source stressed.
http://www.nmsu.edu/~ucomm/Releases/2001/April2001/composi5.html
The composites Sarychev and Shalaev are investigating are similar in structure to films that were being developed for use on stealth aircraft by the Soviet Union when Sarychev was a researcher at the Russian Academy of Science. The difference is mainly a matter of scale.
“The work began in the 1980s and rapidly progressed until the crash of the Soviet Union,” Sarychev said. “The material was almost ready for aircraft when the Cold War ended and interest faded. It would have required building a new airplane, and there was no money.”
The goal of that research was to develop an aircraft skin that would absorb microwave radiation. After Sarychev came to the United States and began collaborating with Shalaev, the two became interested in the optical applications of percolation composites.
“It is quite different in the microwave range, but the main idea is the same,” Sarychev said. “Before, we worked on material that would absorb microwave radiation from far away. Then we started to look inside the material.”
Sarychev has been a visiting professor of physics at NMSU twice and is now a college professor of physics. He has a Ph.D. from the Moscow Physical-Technical Institute and a Doctor of Science — a degree that is higher than the Ph.D. and goes only to the country’s top researchers — from the Institute of High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences.