dark light

Propstrike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,386 through 2,400 (of 3,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Two Lancs together 16/11/08 #1218569
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Brooklands, yes.

    The longer aluminium fuselage is a rough-ish mock-up for internal filming, used in that BBC prouction ‘ Night Flight’ . It has slightly odd external flanges at the joins of the sections, which I photo-shopped out !

    in reply to: de Havilland 88 #1223391
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Reality bites !

    If you are serious about pursuing this interest, get amongst people who know of what they speak, and probably your best angle is to join the Melbourne SAAA ( Sports Aircraft Association of Australia).

    With a model building background you could comfortably start on a Pietenpol Aircamper, which could also be used for part of your flying training. This is a do-able route to becoming a qualified pilot, aircraft owner, and getting experience of the handling qualities of vintage light aircraft.

    in reply to: Ch 5 'Dangerous Adventures for Boys'. #1224565
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Great show. Amusing when my son piped up ‘ wow, there’s Roman from my House at school ‘. He is presently on a ‘Haircut Warning’ apparently!

    But…………why oh why do the producers ALWAYS have to dub over B/W wartime footage with a soundtrack that sounds like a swarm of over-sexed bees?

    Other than that the filming was very well done, especially the footage from the 44.

    in reply to: de Havilland 88 #1224674
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Interesting stuff! I am wondering if you are a pilot at present, or if that is still on the ‘to do’ list. I would have great reservations about taking my visual landing cues from a camera, via an in-cockpit screen, as if you were combining this with external and peripheral views, as is normally the case whilst landing, your eyes will be constantly re-focussing and trying to adjust to different light.

    I would go so far as to say I don’t think it can be done. It is not the same as, say, an airliner using a camera to help in taxi. This may then negate the whole advantage of a glass cockpit.

    in reply to: Spotted #1228895
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I am pretty sure that was it.

    in reply to: Spotted #1229298
    Propstrike
    Participant

    A blue-ish Volpar Beech 18 over Chesham 14.30 hrs, heading north.

    Not the Brunty one is it? I thought that had buzzed off.

    in reply to: Memorial flypasts tomorrow? #1229302
    Propstrike
    Participant

    A little while back, the owner of the ‘Me 108’ at White Waltham, was contemplating roaring round the local countryside at low level, at about 11.00 am and buzzing as many parades as he could manage, perhaps with a victory roll thrown in here and there!

    I think it was the beer talking 🙂

    in reply to: DC-6 G-APSA to visit Heathrow #1232700
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I am destined never to see this aeroplane ( if it exists)

    The ‘no shows’ started in May with Abingdon Fayre. The probability of a display act scrubbing is a direct function of the number of engines- think Vulcan!

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1232724
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Hey!, do I look like a ‘reading the instructions’ kind of guy ??

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1234044
    Propstrike
    Participant

    It was a bit of a curved ball, but that tail just shouted ‘Pietenpol’ and as such it is by no means an obscure or unknown type.

    After all, it only lasted 5 hours !

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1234064
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Curses, foiled again!

    Don’t know about the PT-3 bit, but yes, Pietenpol Biplane is what it is, so J.Aeroclub was thinking along the right lines as well.

    Ok galdri, no one-off Icelandic homebuilts please!:D

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1234457
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Ok , how about this?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1234536
    Propstrike
    Participant

    It is, I believe, a……………………………

    Caproni CA-165

    in reply to: LAA Mag looking good. #432113
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Just got the November issue, and again have to say that the editorial team are managing to consistantly offer a very impressive publication, with effective use of really good air-air photography. The contents is bang up-to -date, with a picture of the Portelli 2-seat Spit, which first flew only a few days ago.

    The printing snag this month is an external issue, and it does mean we are all being sent TWO copies for November 🙂

    in reply to: Bomber Veteran flies BBMF Lanc (Video) #1238049
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Not ‘Pilot in Command’ of course, but as the commentary states, the Captain did allow Sir Michael to (briefly I imagine) take the controls and fly the aeroplane from the right hand seat.

    He seemed very moved at the flight’s conclusion, no wonder really.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,386 through 2,400 (of 3,488 total)