Brooklands, yes.
The longer aluminium fuselage is a rough-ish mock-up for internal filming, used in that BBC prouction ‘ Night Flight’ . It has slightly odd external flanges at the joins of the sections, which I photo-shopped out !
Reality bites !
If you are serious about pursuing this interest, get amongst people who know of what they speak, and probably your best angle is to join the Melbourne SAAA ( Sports Aircraft Association of Australia).
With a model building background you could comfortably start on a Pietenpol Aircamper, which could also be used for part of your flying training. This is a do-able route to becoming a qualified pilot, aircraft owner, and getting experience of the handling qualities of vintage light aircraft.
Great show. Amusing when my son piped up ‘ wow, there’s Roman from my House at school ‘. He is presently on a ‘Haircut Warning’ apparently!
But…………why oh why do the producers ALWAYS have to dub over B/W wartime footage with a soundtrack that sounds like a swarm of over-sexed bees?
Other than that the filming was very well done, especially the footage from the 44.
Interesting stuff! I am wondering if you are a pilot at present, or if that is still on the ‘to do’ list. I would have great reservations about taking my visual landing cues from a camera, via an in-cockpit screen, as if you were combining this with external and peripheral views, as is normally the case whilst landing, your eyes will be constantly re-focussing and trying to adjust to different light.
I would go so far as to say I don’t think it can be done. It is not the same as, say, an airliner using a camera to help in taxi. This may then negate the whole advantage of a glass cockpit.
I am pretty sure that was it.
A blue-ish Volpar Beech 18 over Chesham 14.30 hrs, heading north.
Not the Brunty one is it? I thought that had buzzed off.
A little while back, the owner of the ‘Me 108’ at White Waltham, was contemplating roaring round the local countryside at low level, at about 11.00 am and buzzing as many parades as he could manage, perhaps with a victory roll thrown in here and there!
I think it was the beer talking 🙂
I am destined never to see this aeroplane ( if it exists)
The ‘no shows’ started in May with Abingdon Fayre. The probability of a display act scrubbing is a direct function of the number of engines- think Vulcan!
Hey!, do I look like a ‘reading the instructions’ kind of guy ??
It was a bit of a curved ball, but that tail just shouted ‘Pietenpol’ and as such it is by no means an obscure or unknown type.
After all, it only lasted 5 hours !
Curses, foiled again!
Don’t know about the PT-3 bit, but yes, Pietenpol Biplane is what it is, so J.Aeroclub was thinking along the right lines as well.
Ok galdri, no one-off Icelandic homebuilts please!:D
Ok , how about this?
It is, I believe, a……………………………
Caproni CA-165
Just got the November issue, and again have to say that the editorial team are managing to consistantly offer a very impressive publication, with effective use of really good air-air photography. The contents is bang up-to -date, with a picture of the Portelli 2-seat Spit, which first flew only a few days ago.
The printing snag this month is an external issue, and it does mean we are all being sent TWO copies for November 🙂
Not ‘Pilot in Command’ of course, but as the commentary states, the Captain did allow Sir Michael to (briefly I imagine) take the controls and fly the aeroplane from the right hand seat.
He seemed very moved at the flight’s conclusion, no wonder really.