dark light

SOC

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,531 through 1,545 (of 10,347 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Unknown Sukhoi strategic bomber revealed! #2475064
    SOC
    Participant

    Ken, you made one glaring error. You claim that the jet was based on a scaled up T-10…yet you based your model clearly on the later T-10S design, which wouldn’t have been possible in 1970 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #341720
    SOC
    Participant

    I’ll give it a listen if it’s ever released, but I’m not counting the days or anything. There have been quite a few tracks leaked over the internet. I’ve heard one of them and it was actually pretty damn good, up to their old standards even. I think the problem is that Axl is being even more of an anal perfectionist than Metallica is when they record!

    in reply to: Guns N Roses – Chinese Deomcracy #1911958
    SOC
    Participant

    I’ll give it a listen if it’s ever released, but I’m not counting the days or anything. There have been quite a few tracks leaked over the internet. I’ve heard one of them and it was actually pretty damn good, up to their old standards even. I think the problem is that Axl is being even more of an anal perfectionist than Metallica is when they record!

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2080226
    SOC
    Participant

    [color=red]Junk post deleted, as well as the now-irrelevant responses. In case you haven’t figured it out by now, that is a standard practice of mine. If I delete something that doesn’t belong, then any replies directed solely at that post will also get deleted to clean things up. If your post deals with more than one issue, then I do try and edit it rather than delete it. Anyway, Francois, do try and keep things on topic. If you want to rant about Beijing’s Olympics, it belongs in the General Discussion forum.[/color]

    in reply to: PLA (All Forces) Missiles #1787663
    SOC
    Participant

    Brigade 813’s DF-31 launch sites identified:

    http://geimint.blogspot.com/2008/03/chinese-df-31-launch-sites.html

    in reply to: Boeing withdraws Tanker appeal #2475088
    SOC
    Participant

    “there will also be a 25% reduction in staffing, not in numbers just in weight.”

    That’s just classic 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #341939
    SOC
    Participant

    Tibet is part of China. What China is doing is right insofar as their own political, moral, and ethical standards and policies are concerned. Beyond that, nothing else matters. Other nations are perfectly within their rights to have their own opinions based on their own moral and ethical standards, but they have no right to insist that the Chinese adopt those standards.

    in reply to: tibet #1912060
    SOC
    Participant

    Tibet is part of China. What China is doing is right insofar as their own political, moral, and ethical standards and policies are concerned. Beyond that, nothing else matters. Other nations are perfectly within their rights to have their own opinions based on their own moral and ethical standards, but they have no right to insist that the Chinese adopt those standards.

    in reply to: General Discussion #342348
    SOC
    Participant

    Ask Washington, London, Beijing and Moscow……they have been doing it for decades.

    And they have no right to be doing so. It causes far more problems than it solves.

    in reply to: tibet #1912246
    SOC
    Participant

    Ask Washington, London, Beijing and Moscow……they have been doing it for decades.

    And they have no right to be doing so. It causes far more problems than it solves.

    in reply to: General Discussion #342490
    SOC
    Participant

    Ok Godwin, the Nazi party was a bad example. Why? Because Nazi Germany decided to aggressively expand by attacking its neighbors. That was clearly not an internal cultural issue, was it?

    Beyond that, my point remains. What gives any one nation the right to impose its set of cultural, ethical, and moral standards on any other?

    in reply to: tibet #1912360
    SOC
    Participant

    Ok Godwin, the Nazi party was a bad example. Why? Because Nazi Germany decided to aggressively expand by attacking its neighbors. That was clearly not an internal cultural issue, was it?

    Beyond that, my point remains. What gives any one nation the right to impose its set of cultural, ethical, and moral standards on any other?

    in reply to: General Discussion #342640
    SOC
    Participant

    Does China have the right to systematically eradicate Tibetan culture? If China has that right, why doesn’t the West have its rights?

    China has the right to handle its internal affairs as it sees fit. Just like the USA did in the 1700 and 1800s, or did the native Americans all of a sudden move somewhere else?

    in reply to: tibet #1912400
    SOC
    Participant

    Does China have the right to systematically eradicate Tibetan culture? If China has that right, why doesn’t the West have its rights?

    China has the right to handle its internal affairs as it sees fit. Just like the USA did in the 1700 and 1800s, or did the native Americans all of a sudden move somewhere else?

    in reply to: General Discussion #342646
    SOC
    Participant

    oh the west dosn’t have the moral or ethical clout to judge China eh?

    Nope. China is a different culture with different values. The West has no right to look at China or any other nation and say “adopt our values or else”.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,531 through 1,545 (of 10,347 total)