dark light

SOC

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 10,347 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1786395
    SOC
    Participant

    Russia warns of “military-technical” response if US proceeds with missile defense bases in Europe:

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,378065,00.html

    in reply to: General Discussion #330543
    SOC
    Participant

    How can you not like cats? They’re hilarious! I was watching something on TV yesterday about the formation of the moon. Big red balls of gas are seen floating across the screen. Caesar decides he must investigate and sat on the table in front of the TV entranced for nearly 20 minutes!

    Of course, he’d have been skinned had he scratched the screen, but still 😀

    in reply to: I HATE CATS!!!!!!!!! #1906325
    SOC
    Participant

    How can you not like cats? They’re hilarious! I was watching something on TV yesterday about the formation of the moon. Big red balls of gas are seen floating across the screen. Caesar decides he must investigate and sat on the table in front of the TV entranced for nearly 20 minutes!

    Of course, he’d have been skinned had he scratched the screen, but still 😀

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1786406
    SOC
    Participant

    Potentially, as well as the naval S-300F variants. What I am going to do now is update a bunch of older stuff, and work on finishing up some other articles. Then I’ve got a nice backlog of topics for new pieces. I may actually go back and expand on the S-300P article in places as well. Oh, and I have a GREAT image for this Friday as well.

    On that note, does anyone have any clue where East German S-300P batteries were located?

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1786413
    SOC
    Participant

    Ok Sean, please update your signature at the buttom once you finish the article, so we, the unconscious people could be remembered and would enjoy it 🙂

    Done!

    http://geimint.blogspot.com/2008/07/s-300p-detailed-analysis.html

    in reply to: Who made the best Mig 21? #2474137
    SOC
    Participant

    As for Rose Mirages, well they are already carrying a certain type, but lets keep everyone guessing (I wont say no more on this topic).:)

    There is no evidence whatsoever of any BVR AAM being in service with the PAF. Even the mythical H-4 turned out to be a Denel-designed air to surface standoff weapon.

    By 2012, there is a plan to operationalize and induct the two tier ABM system at key cities, which are currently guarded by the old S-125’s.

    There are currently 35 active and 10 inactive S-125 sites that I’ve located inside of India. The only major cities that have one close enough to be defended by it in any fashion are Agra, Pune and Mumbai, with one each. New Dehli has one nearby but it’s too far away to defend the airspace over the capital. New Dehli does have seven old S-75 sites ringing it, but they are all unoccupied.

    in reply to: Modern Military Aviation News from around the world #2474165
    SOC
    Participant

    [color=red]Another 20 page thread assassination![/color]

    in reply to: F-22 internal fuel #2474168
    SOC
    Participant

    [color=red]20 pages, so…DIE![/color]

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2474171
    SOC
    Participant

    That’s just the regular brake parachute housing.

    in reply to: F-22 internal fuel #2474383
    SOC
    Participant

    I thought there was something about fixed inlets that limited speed to just over Mach 2? Some sort of solution must have been developed for a low-RCS aircraft though, as the GE-powered YF-23 was supposedly capable of exceeding Mach 2 by a substantial margin. I recall reading somewhere that the test pilots had to pay close attention at altitude when the afterburner was engaged or they’d blow right through the redline speed and risk damage to the airframe if they weren’t careful.

    GE F120 + F-23 = probably the most advanced and capable fighter aircraft design to come out of the US, by a decent margin.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2474388
    SOC
    Participant

    Wouldn’t a rear-facing radar be just what the doctor ordered for a HOJ missile? :confused:

    No, but it’d be a target for an air to air ARM like the R-27P. You know, since it’s a radar and not a jammer 😀

    At any rate the first prototype very clearly does not have one, with the cover for the brake chtue and the associated actuators being clearly visible. The only jets carrying actual rear-facing radars are the Su-34s.

    It’s not a bad idea, especially if the accuracy of the R-77 is such that it can hit an AAM or SAM.

    in reply to: The Su-34 'Fullback' Story #2474396
    SOC
    Participant

    I’m sure the Russians are well aware of what kind of RCS reduction measures they could undertake 😛

    I’m not saying that they can’t or haven’t done anything, just that in order for it to be effective they will quite obviously have to have done something to the compressor faces. Making small adjustments to the forward fuselage without giving due attention to the two huge radar reflectors underneath the jet would be asinine 😀 There is of course also the issue of the radar array, which is not canted and is another good radar reflector.

    in reply to: Who made the best Mig 21? #2474430
    SOC
    Participant

    If they really wanted to make a difference they’d turn to China for the HQ-9. Should be cheaper than a comparable Russian-made system. They have some experience with Chinese strategic SAMs after all, with their single HQ-2 battery near Islamabad 😀 India is of course currently no better off in the SAM regard, relying primarily on a bunch of S-125 batteries to defend military airfields.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2474459
    SOC
    Participant

    Is the Su-27BM/Su-35 supposed to use a rear-facing radar system eventually? The first prototype doesn’t have one fitted.

    in reply to: The Su-34 'Fullback' Story #2474462
    SOC
    Participant

    The greater front cross sectional area will also increase head on RCS signature.

    RCS is not necessarily dependent on size. Were that to be true, a MiG-21 would have a smaller RCS than a B-2A! Any head-on RCS reduction measures on the Su-34 are, however, completely worthless if they did nothing to treat the intake trunks and mask the compressor faces from radar.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 10,347 total)