Makes a pleasant change from still images – excellent film. Someone must have been burning the midnight oil editing.
No doubt you’ll get the odd Me109 trying to befriend PV270 – pretenting to be a Spitfire :cool:. You get that sort of thing on the internet :D.
Were you on the lash again last night Phillip?!!
Only my usual four cans of Pepsi Max, though I might have over done the choc ices – four in one evening. It was warm in ‘ull last night.
Just wondering if the recession really is biting. The Courtesy Aircraft web site is now offering a choice of five Mustangs for sale, including a TF-51D project.
Prices ranging from 1.5m to 1.875m USD.Must rush out and buy a lottery ticket!
You’d know if the recession was really biting if they offered them BOGOF :diablo:
(Buy One Get One Free)
At RAF Driffield many of the married quarters accommodated dozens of servicemen and aircrew during the war, with every room being occupied. Like many aerodromes the original design and layout wasn’t large enough to accommodate the increased numbers needed to keep an airfield running.
Some of the officer married quarters I understand had dozens of men billeted in each, with probably only the most senior of officer/s still retaining an entire house to themselves.
A good website to check out is: http://www.airfieldinformationexchange.org/community/forum.php

Since the summer of 2009 I have been keeping myself busy with small artistic projects that involve minimal financial outlay.
While my era of Airfix model making was influenced by the phenomenal artwork of Roy Cross (1960/70s), I have found that replicating the Type 2 (T2) Header Cards from a previous generation (1950/60s) is both therapeutic and ideally suited to my level of PhotoShop competency. I also find these header cards both attractive and their ironical 1950s style very true of the period.
The original Type 2 Header Cards were secured on eBay or scanned ‘n’ emailed by kind and generous enthusiasts.
While I try and remain true to the original, I don’t mind adding detail, as my recreations were enlarged with printing in mind. I also see these images as very much work in progress – with individual header cards constantly being improved upon.
That was then. Alas most of my original reworkings were lost when my old and faithful laptop crashed ‘n’ burned. I’ve also thought about reworking a number of Type 1 (T1) header cards (see above).


Checked out the AAIB website and nothing for Worcestershire in the 1980s.
If you could find out exactly where (maybe it was a military aircraft)…
…probably not:
Hello
There are only three Fergus in the CWGC website and not one of them is a Ken or Kenneth, nor did they die in 1943.
The only Ferguson (died 1943) entries can be found here: http://www.cwgc.org/search/SearchResults.aspx?surname=Ferguson&initials=&war=2&yearfrom=1943&yearto=1943&force=Air&nationality=6&send.x=23&send.y=11
My understanding is that the CWGC have all known KIA from WW2.
Hope the about might be useful.
Best Wishes
Phil Rhodes
She will have no greater value than any other 748! There is no U.K museum demand for them and there are two other former Queens Flight machines flying about that command the same level of interest but have not entered preservation.
XS790 was scrapped at Boscombe Down in the 1990s, while XS793 (3C-KKP) was scrapped a few years ago in Libreville, Gabon. One or two other Andovers served with The Queen’s Flight, but only for brief periods, if not for one-off flights/tours.
Therefore, XS789 (9Q-CLL), is unique and extremely valuable.
Where is it?
Democratic Republic of Congo, though South Africa is where it is normally seen.
My concern is for 9Q-CLL formally with The Queen’s Flight and the last surviving former QF Andover. The owners know she is the sole survivor from RAF Benson and will want top dollar for her.
[SNIP] You may run into problems calling it a “de Havilland Mosquito”, but then you could always call it a “Rhodes Aerospace Blood Sucking Winged Insect Mk. 1” instead.
I would name the aircraft after more important individuals or places.
Pity that no role could be found for the aircraft in the real world. The bomb bay is too small as an overnight mail carrier, while all other roles can be undertaken by modern aircraft. Find a new use for this aircraft that cannot be undertaken by anything newer and you might have a chance, but I doubt it. Best stick to Airfix, I reckon.
Why on earth would you want to build a 99% scale replica, surely more straight forward and better in all respects to build it full scale?
Because if you built an exact replica BAe Systems might not allow it as they own the design rights. Build a replica, slightly out of scale and out of composite materials and they might not be able to do anything other than moan. Then again, it’s all pie in the sky, as with most “what if…” and “how about…”
Slightly off topic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UKot0qIFb4
I’m still waiting for 663 Squadron and Mosquito Squadron to appear as FREE DVDs in some news paper or other, as I appear to have every other war or aviation film on disc.
What surprises me is that for the same price of two episodes of Dr Who the BBC could make a reasonable attempt at telling the story that is Operation Jericho. All the flying sequences and aerodrome footage could be CGI without any problems. Actually I would imagine that 90% could be CGI, not just those involving the mosquito.