dark light

Phillip Rhodes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 751 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: VIDEO: Moth Club's Rally at RAF Halton #453717
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Makes a pleasant change from still images – excellent film. Someone must have been burning the midnight oil editing.

    in reply to: Spitfire PV270 now on Facebook #1122433
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    No doubt you’ll get the odd Me109 trying to befriend PV270 – pretenting to be a Spitfire :cool:. You get that sort of thing on the internet :D.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain “beacon" – A Suggestion: #1126941
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Were you on the lash again last night Phillip?!!

    Only my usual four cans of Pepsi Max, though I might have over done the choc ices – four in one evening. It was warm in ‘ull last night.

    in reply to: Five P-51Ds Now For Sale #1127481
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Just wondering if the recession really is biting. The Courtesy Aircraft web site is now offering a choice of five Mustangs for sale, including a TF-51D project.
    Prices ranging from 1.5m to 1.875m USD.

    Must rush out and buy a lottery ticket!

    You’d know if the recession was really biting if they offered them BOGOF :diablo:

    (Buy One Get One Free)

    in reply to: Married Quarters #1127608
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    At RAF Driffield many of the married quarters accommodated dozens of servicemen and aircrew during the war, with every room being occupied. Like many aerodromes the original design and layout wasn’t large enough to accommodate the increased numbers needed to keep an airfield running.

    Some of the officer married quarters I understand had dozens of men billeted in each, with probably only the most senior of officer/s still retaining an entire house to themselves.

    A good website to check out is: http://www.airfieldinformationexchange.org/community/forum.php

    in reply to: Forum Virtual Art Gallery #1128916
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1269/4662219806_b40b912e48_b.jpg

    Since the summer of 2009 I have been keeping myself busy with small artistic projects that involve minimal financial outlay.

    While my era of Airfix model making was influenced by the phenomenal artwork of Roy Cross (1960/70s), I have found that replicating the Type 2 (T2) Header Cards from a previous generation (1950/60s) is both therapeutic and ideally suited to my level of PhotoShop competency. I also find these header cards both attractive and their ironical 1950s style very true of the period.

    The original Type 2 Header Cards were secured on eBay or scanned ‘n’ emailed by kind and generous enthusiasts.

    While I try and remain true to the original, I don’t mind adding detail, as my recreations were enlarged with printing in mind. I also see these images as very much work in progress – with individual header cards constantly being improved upon.

    That was then. Alas most of my original reworkings were lost when my old and faithful laptop crashed ‘n’ burned. I’ve also thought about reworking a number of Type 1 (T1) header cards (see above).

    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4014/4578318454_ef0799ed68_o.jpg

    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4067/4577685321_6145e61359_o.jpg

    in reply to: Info required #1130381
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Checked out the AAIB website and nothing for Worcestershire in the 1980s.

    http://www.aaib.gov.uk/publications/formal_reports/formal_report_archive/formal_reports_1989_1980.cfm

    If you could find out exactly where (maybe it was a military aircraft)…

    …probably not:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_military_aircraft_(1975%E2%80%931999)#1980

    in reply to: RFI #1131202
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Hello

    There are only three Fergus in the CWGC website and not one of them is a Ken or Kenneth, nor did they die in 1943.

    The only Ferguson (died 1943) entries can be found here: http://www.cwgc.org/search/SearchResults.aspx?surname=Ferguson&initials=&war=2&yearfrom=1943&yearto=1943&force=Air&nationality=6&send.x=23&send.y=11

    My understanding is that the CWGC have all known KIA from WW2.

    Hope the about might be useful.

    Best Wishes

    Phil Rhodes

    in reply to: HS – 748 / Andover Perserved? #1146066
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    She will have no greater value than any other 748! There is no U.K museum demand for them and there are two other former Queens Flight machines flying about that command the same level of interest but have not entered preservation.

    XS790 was scrapped at Boscombe Down in the 1990s, while XS793 (3C-KKP) was scrapped a few years ago in Libreville, Gabon. One or two other Andovers served with The Queen’s Flight, but only for brief periods, if not for one-off flights/tours.

    Therefore, XS789 (9Q-CLL), is unique and extremely valuable.

    in reply to: HS – 748 / Andover Perserved? #1146081
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Where is it?

    Democratic Republic of Congo, though South Africa is where it is normally seen.

    in reply to: HS – 748 / Andover Perserved? #1146105
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    My concern is for 9Q-CLL formally with The Queen’s Flight and the last surviving former QF Andover. The owners know she is the sole survivor from RAF Benson and will want top dollar for her.

    in reply to: Defunct Types Resurrected into Production #1146213
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    [SNIP] You may run into problems calling it a “de Havilland Mosquito”, but then you could always call it a “Rhodes Aerospace Blood Sucking Winged Insect Mk. 1” instead.

    I would name the aircraft after more important individuals or places.

    Pity that no role could be found for the aircraft in the real world. The bomb bay is too small as an overnight mail carrier, while all other roles can be undertaken by modern aircraft. Find a new use for this aircraft that cannot be undertaken by anything newer and you might have a chance, but I doubt it. Best stick to Airfix, I reckon.

    in reply to: Defunct Types Resurrected into Production #1146298
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Why on earth would you want to build a 99% scale replica, surely more straight forward and better in all respects to build it full scale?

    Because if you built an exact replica BAe Systems might not allow it as they own the design rights. Build a replica, slightly out of scale and out of composite materials and they might not be able to do anything other than moan. Then again, it’s all pie in the sky, as with most “what if…” and “how about…”

    in reply to: 633 squadron #1146521
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant
    in reply to: 633 squadron #1146523
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    I’m still waiting for 663 Squadron and Mosquito Squadron to appear as FREE DVDs in some news paper or other, as I appear to have every other war or aviation film on disc.

    What surprises me is that for the same price of two episodes of Dr Who the BBC could make a reasonable attempt at telling the story that is Operation Jericho. All the flying sequences and aerodrome footage could be CGI without any problems. Actually I would imagine that 90% could be CGI, not just those involving the mosquito.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 751 total)