Thanks Papa Lima,
COMPLETELY independent !! That answers it.
Yes and that Spoontoon website is a bit weird 😀
Cheers
TNZ
Okay, here’s one of my most recent photos of the beloved T-6 from Wanaka…
Hope you enjoy 🙂
TNZ
Does the Gannet have completely independent powerplant to prop units too ?
ie able to fly on one engine and prop with other unit stopped & prop feathered?
Stormbird Phil, you’re right !! You only have to look at http://www.luft46.com to see that !!! 😮
The Salamander will always be one of those “what ifs” …
Are there any mpegs or avis available on the Schneider Cup races ?
I would LOVE to hear and see the Macchi start up movie like that (poorly) quoted text stated..
Also how closely related were the “R” engines of the S-6 series to the Kestrel and Merlin ?
Apologies if this has already been discussed before, I am totally fascinated with the S Cup racers !! 🙂
Cheers
TNZ
I agree.
What I make of it is that the engines could and were started independently and I guess the props spun independently, but…..
“Behind this propeller stand a singular twin engine, obtained coupling on the same axle”
If that was the case then the 2 engines would be connected together ….
I dunno, my head hurts too !!
TNZ
(PS I think its Italian to English translation)
This was taken from the website http://www.esparacing.com/Air%20Racing%20History/aircraft/Macchi-Castoli%20%20MC%2072.htm
In the difficult floating phase, torque absence should allow to have a balanced load on the floats: an important aspect, considering that, with 1800HP engine, the left float was loaded 23% more than right one. In 1931 Supermarine S-6B with 2650HP was 32% overloaded, while MC-72 barely reached 3% even with 3000HP. Behind this propeller stand a singular twin engine, obtained coupling on the same axle two 12V, 60 degrees engines directly derived from AS-5, each moving a propeller through two coaxial crankshafts passing through forward engine banks. Air intakes were in the centre, between both engines, while breathing system, composed by a centrifugal compressor and a bank of 8 aspirated carburettors, was single for the whole plant.
The plates “Front Engine” and “Back Engine”, still in the cockpit, show that semi-engines were independent, as confirmed by run-up scene in the famous movie of the record. It seemed the simplest solution, but, as often happens, AS-6 promises were harder to win than expected.
So from this, they were independently run but geared to the props together? :confused:
Cheers
TNZ
Here’s a beautiful painting of the awesome Macchi-Castoli MC72..
(http://www.sarsfield.com)
Yup just to reiterate, beautiful beast (Seafury that is…)
TNZ
I think a M-72 red job is in a Museum in Italy 🙂 , Forgot it name its on a lake shore, I tried to get a picture of it 🙁 , As I had seen it in an issue of Classic Wings Down under a while back, Good restoration job, It looked fantastic, But I could not get any links working to look inside the place to get a current photo 🙁 , Cheers everyone, Tally Ho! 😉 Phil,(No comments on the V-32 0r Sea Salamander :p ) :dev2:
Whats the story behind the V-32 & Sea Salamander ?
They just artists fantasy impressions or real considerations?
TNZ
excellent pic !!!
My fav is an ATC controller asking the Bev pilots to check that their gear was down and locked for take-off.
Their reply was “Checked, down and….welded” !!!! 😀
TNZ
Excellent !! 🙂 🙂
The Macchi must have been a beast to hear with all of those longitudinal cylinders !!
I agree with Allan, I wonder how they were to fly. I would reckon the torque would be negligible due to the contra-rotating props but with that small wing would probably wing-stall at the drop of a hat.. 😮
Cheers
TNZ
Thanks for the pics, SB.
Do you have any of the truly awesome tandem-twin engined Macchis ?
Hi John,
Could cost a little more to run than my V6 Pajero (which isnt cheap to run !!)
Also, how do I get that one past the missus?? 😮
A-10’s are coming up for retirement in the USAF, could be a little cheaper to run and with that 30mm Vulcan we would get any airfield we wanted, let alone apron space !!!!!
TNZ
I agree, don’t let him get to you, Andrewman.
TNZ
Well I find the F-111 a fantastic aircraft no matter WHAT FORUM THEY ARE POSTED IN !!!!
Hi John,
Can’t wait, love looking at pics of the dump and burn.
THe Aussies did what the Yanks couldn’t, ie make something of this underrated baby !!
(Well I guess the EF-111 Raven was good too 😀 )
TNZ
Looking forward to the pictures of the “CLASSIC” F-111 dump & burn… 😉
Saw it as a kid once at a Whenuapai Airshow but would dearly love to see it again.
Those F-111’s must be getting on a bit now almost “HISTORIC” one would think…
TNZ