Got the images finally.
These are all from Spitfire Story by Alfred Price. Hopefully they look OK on-screen, as I had to reduce them a bit.
First view – GA of K5054 as she was on 5 March 1936.
Second view – comparison between Spitfire MkI and K5054
Third view – GA of K5054 as she was around May 1936 (IIRC)
(Hmm – just realised that they don’t! Turbo, e-mail me if you want better versions and I’ll be happy to forward them.)
Hi Daz,
I’ve dropped you an email.
Cheers
Chris
O/T a little but that awesome Bristol car reminds me of this car i found yesterday, powered by a Merlin from a Spitfire!
Found on this website
http://www.electronicsind.freeserve.co.uk/pat8.htm
Whao !!!
Betcha that thing is a handful to drive !!!!!
yeap, a tuboprop is better than a turbofan at low altitude, not to mention extra 2 engines but I guess the ability of operating at lower costs and the ability of the platform to develop into an ELINT aircraft to replace the EP-3 sway the Navy over to boeing.
Also wonder if it is as resistant to “collisions” as the EP-3 ?? 😉
Will it be as a good at loitering over a long distance at low altitude and slow speed as the P-3 ?
Just doesn’t seem to be a 737 environment, in my opinion.
Thanks so much Papa Lima and Daz.
I will be sure to forward these to my mate.
I will also make sure I get a pic of the finished article to post here, as he is a very good modeller.
And Philo,…..well…it was a great game of rugby (for us anyway). Maybe if you had your mate Johnny in there kicking, it wouldnt have been too bad. 😀
turbo_nz
here are a couple of not very good pics of the replica at Tangmere. Taken July 2002. Hope it helps.
Ken
They’re excellent !!
Thanks Ken,
Cheers
Chris
That would be great, thanks Daz.
There’s not really a lot of close-up pics in googling searching.
BTW How is your replica homebuilt Spit coming along ?
TurboNZ… I disagree. I think it looks like a nice aircraft (although only in the civil scheme and with the spats).
I think it’s probably the pics. A frontal quarter pic would be good to see to get a better perspective of it.
🙂
Back to the caption contest ….
“This remote controlled reverse-thrust is great for backing into tight airplane parks….”
Looks like a little bump and the tail fins would come away easily….
It ain’t pretty…
Mr Jimmy Stewart takes the cake here.
Strategic Air Command is nothing less than spectacular and they can never make a movie like that ever again.
B-36’s rumbling through my surround sound….hmmm,…wet dream material !!!
He was also great in Spirit of St Louis as Charles Lindbergh.
I believe that having a real pilot as an actor gives the aviation movie so much more credibility as they actually know what they’re talking about (a certain Mr Affleck couldn’t even tie his own shoe laces). 😀
I found these pics on http://www.pointvista.com/WW2GliderPilots/gliderretrieval.htm
The concept was for them to be reused if possible. A great many however were reduced to matchwood due to crashes and collisions.
Wasn’t there a slingshot-type recovery built for snatching the Horsas on the ground by a Dak snagging a wire ?
If you guys ever get a chance, get a copy of “Call of Duty” to play. Its an excellent first-person PC game and one of the missions you can play is a paratrooper insertion by Horsa Glider into a field near Pegasus Bridge. Very realistic !!
Actually looks pretty darn fine to me.
The guys that flew these were definitely underrated and unsung heros in my opinion.
I take my hat off and salute their contribution.
Must have taken extreme guts to fly one of these that according to sources in the know glided like bricks.
Cheers
Chris
“Remembering those that fought at D-Day”