Back to the subject…why this doesn’t fit Global Hawk? Because Global Hawk is way too small and too slow. Not even the stretched version is close to the payload size/weight of a 737. As to no props. EP3 incident with China have shown that in today’s world where many countries are eager to claim regional dominance (ths so called “multi-polar” world), having a fast jet makes interceptions much harder while covering much larger areas. I think we have to remember that the ranges of jets today with the same name, say 737 (200 versus the NGs), is significantly greater thanks to engine efficiencies (i.e., CFMs). Of course props in theory can still fly farther on cruise, but that conflicts with speed(and then Garry’s going to bring in the behemoth Bear…yes, yes, it’s very fast for a prop, but . This is the same problem many don’t realize when they bash the SH (F18) versus the F14. Sure, the F14 can fly further, but at much slower cruise speeds with wings extended.
On the side, maybe Arthur can answer this one since i’ve never been on a large military prop….isn’t it kinda uncomfortable, all that vibration over hours?
The EP-3 (P-3) is fast for a turboprop and is probably only 100 knots slower than a 737NG. Makes little difference when getting intercepted by a Mig-29 (for example). I can’t see a 737 outrunning one of those.
And as far as manoeuvribility, I’ve seen how the P-3 turns at low altitude. Very impressive.
The RNZAF operates the P-3 and these are very reliable and do a sterling job.
They were recently upgraded (Project Kahu) with modern equipment to keep them performing.
Cheers
Chris
Sign In
