Sounds OK – is Joy the latest, Daz?;);):diablo:
What a lot of “hate” and anger in various threads over the weekend. How can you “hate” a comic?:confused::(
What a lot of “hate” and anger in various threads over the weekend. How can you “hate” a comic?:confused::(
If we are going Stateside, as well as those you mentioned( except Robin Williams)- Bob Newhart, Woody Allen, Jack Benny, Alan Sherman, Lenny Bruce, Rich Hall, George Burns……..et al.:D
If we are going Stateside, as well as those you mentioned( except Robin Williams)- Bob Newhart, Woody Allen, Jack Benny, Alan Sherman, Lenny Bruce, Rich Hall, George Burns……..et al.:D
….and Galton and Simpson.
….and Galton and Simpson.
:confused::confused:I think you’ll find I have given you a rather long list of favourite comedians with which others have agreed or not responded to, and mentioned two, I think, whom I don’t find funny….:confused:
:confused::confused:I think you’ll find I have given you a rather long list of favourite comedians with which others have agreed or not responded to, and mentioned two, I think, whom I don’t find funny….:confused:
I wish I had the faith that some here have that mistakes will never be made. What really appals me is the admission that the death penalty is still justifiable, on balance, even if a miscarriage is made. Not if it was a family member who got the chop by mistake.
I wish I had the faith that some here have that mistakes will never be made. What really appals me is the admission that the death penalty is still justifiable, on balance, even if a miscarriage is made. Not if it was a family member who got the chop by mistake.
I didn’t say they were funny, just that no-one had mentioned them. 😉
But the use of the word “Astounding…” implied that you thought them fit for inclusion in the category. 😉
I didn’t say they were funny, just that no-one had mentioned them. 😉
But the use of the word “Astounding…” implied that you thought them fit for inclusion in the category. 😉
Of course not…just pointing out one advantage,I would have thought with todays forensics etc…M.O.J’s for capital offences would be less likely than (say) in the 60’s.
Less likely!! They need to be 100% copper-bottomed guaranteed not to be miscarried. And that will never happen.
Of course not…just pointing out one advantage,I would have thought with todays forensics etc…M.O.J’s for capital offences would be less likely than (say) in the 60’s.
Less likely!! They need to be 100% copper-bottomed guaranteed not to be miscarried. And that will never happen.