dark light

Sky High

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,656 through 5,670 (of 7,143 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dambusters Declassified – BBC2, 17th Oct 8PM. #1105301
    Sky High
    Participant

    All the more reason for doing it, I would have thought!;)

    in reply to: General Discussion #324963
    Sky High
    Participant

    I do hope this forum is not becoming over-PC in its interpretation of its Code.

    in reply to: Happy 70Th birthday John Lennon #1905374
    Sky High
    Participant

    I do hope this forum is not becoming over-PC in its interpretation of its Code.

    in reply to: Historic Aviation Forum: RSS Feed #1105422
    Sky High
    Participant

    YES, please – it would definitely get my vote.:)

    in reply to: End of Biggin Hill airshow #417888
    Sky High
    Participant

    I cannot access it but if anyone is on facebook check the Biggin Hill official’s statement about the future of the Air Fair at another venue with BoB connections.

    in reply to: General Discussion #325198
    Sky High
    Participant

    Dr Pepper – Werewolf in London was pretty good and the transformation scenes were very good indeed but I don’t remember being “frightened”. I suppose it is because you know it is all a fantasy. Real fear comes from what is or could be real.

    in reply to: We need a good horror movie #1905479
    Sky High
    Participant

    Dr Pepper – Werewolf in London was pretty good and the transformation scenes were very good indeed but I don’t remember being “frightened”. I suppose it is because you know it is all a fantasy. Real fear comes from what is or could be real.

    in reply to: Empire of the Clouds – James Hamilton-Paterson #1107095
    Sky High
    Participant

    No it didnt – perhaps this is just a number confusion, but the 108 killed Geoffrey Junior. The 110 killed Derry and Richards.

    Bruce

    I think it is sloppy reviewing, just as is the muddling of these names:
    “Roland Twiss, Ronald Falk, Bill Cunningham… test pilots all,”

    in reply to: Empire of the Clouds – James Hamilton-Paterson #1107173
    Sky High
    Participant

    I too read the review and was going to ask the same question. Mrs SH heard the interview and thought I might like it in the Christmas Stocking. I’ll look out for more observations from posters but I am intrigued enough already, to want to read it.

    in reply to: General Discussion #325382
    Sky High
    Participant

    Presumably the only reason you are welcome there in a period of recession and high unemployment in the US is because your wife to be is a US citizen.

    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today? Part 2 #1905567
    Sky High
    Participant

    Presumably the only reason you are welcome there in a period of recession and high unemployment in the US is because your wife to be is a US citizen.

    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today? Part 2 #1905571
    Sky High
    Participant

    I am intrigued to know what the well paid job in the US is.

    in reply to: General Discussion #325390
    Sky High
    Participant

    I am intrigued to know what the well paid job in the US is.

    in reply to: General Discussion #325456
    Sky High
    Participant

    It turns the entire basis of gainful employment on its head. An individual works and received remuneration for doing so. End of story until the state decides it will take a percentage of the money to provide services everyone can use.

    The proposal effectively says that the state takes all the remuneration before distributing a percentage of it to the workers. I suppose it comes close to the Marxist doctrine whereby we all work for the state anyway.

    What the government should be doing, of course, is hugely simplifying the entire tax system so that it works smoothly.

    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today? Part 2 #1905584
    Sky High
    Participant

    It turns the entire basis of gainful employment on its head. An individual works and received remuneration for doing so. End of story until the state decides it will take a percentage of the money to provide services everyone can use.

    The proposal effectively says that the state takes all the remuneration before distributing a percentage of it to the workers. I suppose it comes close to the Marxist doctrine whereby we all work for the state anyway.

    What the government should be doing, of course, is hugely simplifying the entire tax system so that it works smoothly.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,656 through 5,670 (of 7,143 total)