You are a lucky man – sadly I have had to shed about 500 books in the last year and I now operate a strictly one in one out basis so I too have a backlog but also lose a few old favourites from time to time.
I suppose the Liquidator will attempt to realise it as an Asset, so someone might get a Dak more cheaply than if was on the open market, and perhaps justify the cost of its restoration to flying condition.
Well, yes, of course, but so many and for 30 years more? That I did not know.
Then you’d better make sure you tell them!;)
Then you’d better make sure you tell them!;)
Bruce – my apologies for misinterpreting your original comments. With regard to the sentimernts expressed in the last part of your first paragraph we are clearly of a mind.
But you haven’t mentioned counselling………:rolleyes:
But you haven’t mentioned counselling………:rolleyes:
Bruce – that’s a rather oversensitive reaction. I am not “laying anything at anyone’s door” I am stating a fact. I could not care less if people dismiss something as rubbish and laud another peice of work that I might find rubbish. It is so subjective that it is pointless to argue about it, other to debate the actual technical merit in a work. But even that is rarely an objective debate.
I don’t follow the objections to this. As Moggy says anyone could have acquired the items and art is of course a subjectively viewed medium and what is art to someone is rubbish to another. I find it unusual and interesting and would certainly visit it, if I were able to.
😀 so, in short, another typical National Geographic story! And to think how addicted we were to those glossy, yellow treasures which dropped on to the doormat every month. How much has changed……..:(
😀 so, in short, another typical National Geographic story! And to think how addicted we were to those glossy, yellow treasures which dropped on to the doormat every month. How much has changed……..:(
Do we really set much store by this research based on estmates of this and two different computer models making predictions from ther information fed to them? And so what? 8,000 deaths is a fraction of deaths from a dozen other causes.
Do we really set much store by this research based on estmates of this and two different computer models making predictions from ther information fed to them? And so what? 8,000 deaths is a fraction of deaths from a dozen other causes.
At the end of the day the plane will be grounded or it will continue to fly courtesy of large amounts of cash. If no one in the UK is willing then what is the view? Maintain a flying Vulcan somewhere else or accept that it will never fly again. It is all down to pounds, dollars, or roubles.