Granted, there are a lot less airplanes displayed than at the old museum, and as an enthusiast I am less than happy about that. On the plus side a lot more of the larger airframes will be under cover (some in storage), and the location is a lot more appropriate than the old one (it being the oldest military airfield in the country).
So what has happened to the aircraft that they don’t have room for, but were on display at the old site?
I don’t know if its the same aircraft used, Flight refuelling used a Kestrel for testing brake linings at Tarrant Rushton Airfield in the late 1970’s before its closure. It was remote controlled and fitted with flaps on the upper wing surface to prevent it taking off. They use to send it down the runway at full thrust then jam the brakes on. Something to do with braking material evaluation. It use to be kept in 2 Hanger which is still there. The hanger that is, not the aircraft.
The ‘Kestrel’ at Tarrant Rushton was actually a P.1127 development aircraft, XP980, that had the wings of Harrier XV751 fitted to it, which may have given it the appearance of a Kestrel. This aircraft later went to Culdrose as a ground handling airframe, then was reunited with the correct wings and restored for the FAA Museum at Yeovilton. The Cosford Kestrel is XS695 which also was previously a ground handling airframe at Culdrose ignominiously painted to look like a Sea Harrier!
I’ll believe it when I see it! There has been talk of this for the last ten years since Concorde landed for the last time at Filton.
The photo immediately said Ireland to me! I thought the Sandringham took off from Poole Harbour, wish I could remember as I was on it!
Correct on both counts. I have a postcard of the Sandringham showing the same location in Ireland as in that photo.
On a positive note, with Key taking over Aeroplane Monthly, the two magazines will not now publish the same material. There is room for both magazines, providing they agree on a publishing strategy. Flypast is mainly devoted to WW2 military and war stories. If Aeroplane concentrated on civil aviation and aircraft development, with the odd military feature, it could work, especially as Ben Dunnell has taken over as editor. He did a fantastic job with Aircraft Illustrated when it was rebranded as Classic Aircraft. A few years ago the paper quality of Aeroplane was reduced to that of toilet paper, in a cost-cutting measure. In my opinion, this killed off a lot of readers, as the photo reproduction wasn’t so good and the quality feel of the magazine was lost. If Key can upgrade the paper quality, Aeroplane could rise again. Yes, there is much to be said about everything being ‘on line’ now, but nothing can replaced having a good quality mag in your hands to read.
I do hope XS743 ends up at the BD Museum at Old Sarum, or perhaps at Cosford as there are no Bassets preserved.
Don’t know what has happened to XS770/G-HRHI as its CofA expired in 2006. Am very priviledged to say I have flown in this one and as the former ‘Reagle Beagle’
have sat where HRH Prince Charles placed his bum during conversion training.:cool:
I just can’t see the new owners letting an iconic title like ‘Aeroplane’ fade into oblivion
You mean like ‘Air Pictorial’ and ‘Aircraft Illustrated/Classic Aircraft’? Hmmm, watch this space!
I really can’t understand the idea that AM and FP have the same style and content – to me they are chalk and cheese.
FP has always tended to err towards old-boys war stories, AP towards preservation and type history.I always found FP harder to read, always found AM a much clearer and concise layout.
Room for them both for me…
Quite agree! However, AM monthly started to go downhill when Mick Oakey left as editor. Then the paper quality went down and they tried to start competing with FP by cramming too much in it, making it harder to read. AM was at its best during the ’70s and ’80s in my opinion
Shame…..he was a great guy…and a great photographer. I guess he could only have been in his fifties…early sixties??
Time marches on! He was in his late ’60s I believe, possibly would have been 70 next year.
A dear friend and a gentleman for almost 50 years
It looks like white on the film (4.18min’s)
I would agree with that, but when it was in the UK, pics appear to show the immediate underside of the front fuselage as red and the rest white, but possibly the extreme rear fuselage returning to red? I wonder if Mike Kimbrell has extended the white beneath the nose since he bought it?
And it’s a FM-2–isn’t it? So not really applicable to pre-war schemes. It approximates to a Wildcat Mk.VI in FAA service.
Exactly, and I’m pretty sure I read that Shuttleworth plan to restore it as a FAA Martlet to fly with the Sea Hurricane, so would expect to eventually see it inthe same scheme.
Adrian:
I just made a short Video Doc on G-ADDI and other flying Dragons. The URL, if you want to see it on You Tube/Google is: http://youtu.be/48BsHNb23qE
Thanks John, I have already watched that and brought back fond memories. Still can’t determine whether the underside of the fuselage is red or white though? Any idea?
The first one is Heathrow, but the other three look like Northolt, which is where BEA operated from before they moved into Heathrow.
That’s a Wessex Tony, not a Whirlwind!
Apologies for resurrecting this tread but can anyone provide details of when XS177 flew with the team, does anyone have any pictures showing her in the team colours and finally does anyone have any film of a macaws display? Many thanks!
XS177 was with CATCS at Shawbury in 1971,so must have joined CAW after that. All my pics of the 1972 team do not include XS177, so it must have been with them for their last season – 1973.