dark light

AndyG

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 471 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Licenced recovery of DH Hornet PX229 #1064280
    AndyG
    Participant

    When I cleaned up the steel parts from PX274 I used the Bilt Hamber Deox powder dissolved in a dustbin of water and then painted the parts. It worked well on most of the parts, though some of the valve springs were soo heavily rusted they looked the same after sitting in the solution for a week.

    The reduction gear and oxygen bottle came up well, though I’d alraedy cleared most of the rust off with a wire brush attachment for my angle grinder.

    I use Deox-C too, fantastic stuff if you use it right.

    The trick is to use a warm to medium hot solution. I have a stainless container which I sit on top of an oil fired range at low output. Maintain a temperature of about 50°C. You don’t want to simmer too much or boil it, then the efficiency is remarkable. You must take the parts out every hour or so and use nylon or brass brush or scotchbrite as applicable to agitate the surface.

    You shouldn’t have to mechanically grind or power wire brush parts to near base metal to start with. That defeats the object! I would though suggest for really super heavy scale, on larger less fragile items, chipping lightly with a blunt cold chisel to start with, to flake off the heavier scale.

    Removal of oils and grease is essential first as it won’t work otherwise. Leaves good chrome intact and very good for improving dramatically any brown and pitted chrome if originality is desired. Won’t touch still bonded paint areas, plastics or rubber either. Will strip cadmium and other lightweight oxide type coatings.

    I have had very good results dunking heavily seized mixed material assemblies in the hot solution, which came apart readily without further mechanical damage afterwards. Otherwise impossible. It should remove all oxide down to pit level leaving dull grey base metal only, if you do it right.

    To give you an example, if you take a 12 year old heavily scaled car brake caliper mounting frame and dunk it in at 10:00 am. You should be painting perfect grey base metal at 5:00pm

    in reply to: Ken Wallis BBC One Show Tonight #1065704
    AndyG
    Participant

    Ken, cool as a cucumber says, ”my dear, i’m a ex night bomber pilot”
    You could have head a pin drop,…………………respect.

    Paul
    XS186 CREW

    Marvellous!! :D:D:D

    in reply to: Spitfire Survivors out? #1078865
    AndyG
    Participant

    A question for you gents. For the airframes that are re-born on the back of a few twisted pieces of metal, that might about fill a dinky ‘Halfords’ sized trailer, what happens to the metal that is not able to be re-used or used as patterns? I can imagine that some projects might have an equally large pile of twisted metal in a pile next to the completed airframe.

    Does it get quietly disposed of anonymously to prevent further re-births?

    a pm is fine.

    in reply to: French building flying Mosquito replica? #1087784
    AndyG
    Participant

    Propstrike

    Well put. Its not my bag, but I take my hat off to those that have spent time designing and building the aircraft.

    Bruce

    I concur, well put both of you.

    Creaking Door, nice recovery too. Takes balls to admit you made a mistake. 🙂

    in reply to: Scrapping the Nimrods at Woodford #1091726
    AndyG
    Participant

    Are these RC-135’s really ex tankers and if so of what vintage are their engines and airframes?

    in reply to: Scrapping the Nimrods at Woodford #1091801
    AndyG
    Participant

    If back when the initial MRA 4 project was started, someone had said no don’t use the old Nimrod airframes as the basis for the project, for reasons that have now become apparent, what would the RAF/MoD have gone for and what would the effect of this been on the demise of UK large aircraft manufacturing capacity?

    100% Septic off the peg inferior design

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton #1106125
    AndyG
    Participant

    Us Yorkshiremen are far tighter than the Scots, and I can prove it. You can survive in a sealed room with a Scotsman, yet you can’t with a Yorkshireman. Why? Because a Yorkshireman only breates IN! 😀

    You must know what the definition of a Yorkshireman is?

    It’s a Scotsman, but with all the generosity in him wrung out. 😀

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1114083
    AndyG
    Participant

    I would guess not

    I think he was referring to the non eBay bits, which are clearly being verified for more than a taxi 🙂

    in reply to: Woodwork / carpentry course #1119008
    AndyG
    Participant

    Hello,
    Does anyone know of any good woodworking / carpentry courses?
    Kind regards
    Mark

    When you come to buying tools, I recommend you use Ebay and buy old US/UK tools.

    If you need hand planes, you can still get pretty mint Stanley planes from the 30’s thro 50’s for a fraction of the cost of a new B&Q job. Quality is better than the UK 70’s onwards I’d say too.

    in reply to: Merlin engine Cam Shaft #1125716
    AndyG
    Participant

    Can anyone tell me why the rocker shafts rotate? Were they used as accessory drives at the other end or something?

    in reply to: Is Concorde really a "British" design? (2009 thread) #1131505
    AndyG
    Participant

    Andy …I meant in a broader fashion,ie make (say) 100 concordes or (say) 500 BAC 3-11’s or similar,one needs to build in volume to make real money.
    I have already said it was a beautiful a/c but it would have had to be the flagship of other commercial designs and not just the stand alone survivor of british built commercial a/c.

    rgds baz

    As I intimated and suggested before, the untenable commercial position of the research, design and build, over shadows what the product if blessed with 737 development management skills and economics, would have been remembered for.

    It was and is still, today a viable commercial product, not a museum concept.

    in reply to: Is Concorde really a "British" design? (2009 thread) #1131520
    AndyG
    Participant

    Have to disagree on that statement…the a/c was simply not economically viable.
    (cough 3-11 anybody ?)

    BA was making lots of money on Concorde.

    One of the big killers (other than Bliar) was when the WTC came down, a resident major Concorde client base user dissappeared in the rubble….

    in reply to: Is Concorde really a "British" design? (2009 thread) #1131524
    AndyG
    Participant

    Andy…did you not see my final sentence ??
    Or was it just good old fashioned selective quoting LOL 😀

    That would appear to be a contradiction that is was a waste of money/resources?
    😀

    in reply to: Is Concorde really a "British" design? (2009 thread) #1131535
    AndyG
    Participant

    both a/c were a waste of money/resources.
    rgds baz

    Rubbish…

    How many prototypes and trials aircraft from the earliest days of flight through to more modern times, failed in themselves, but none the less provided valuable flight performance data, materials advancement, construction advancement, systems and engine information, which would otherwise not have been available?

    These same programmes of ‘failure’ also birthed individuals who would in their own right go on to much greater things, armed with their valuable experience and knowledge (how not to do it). Not to mention the trades and manufacturing process enhancements and advancement.

    Don’t knock failures altogether, there is are usually an upside.

    Don’t forget, had the huge costs of the commercial aspects of the design and marketing of Concorde been better managed (without inept Govt influence) and not sabotaged by the S(c)eptics, the later indisputable commercial success of its BA operations would be viewed in a much more favourable light.

    The concept worked and today it still remains the only museum piece that is not obsolete.

    Thanks again Tony Bliar……

    in reply to: Scrapping the Nimrods at Woodford #1137699
    AndyG
    Participant

    How much is the looming conflict with Iran going to cost?:eek:

    If the unsavoury and unelected elements of the ‘actual’ US administration, are stupid enough to go it alone or act on behalf of unsavoury others, it may ‘cost the Earth’.

    The destruction of MR4’s will then be the least of our worries.:eek:

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 471 total)