dark light

dailee1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 137 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: what new restored aircraft could appear in 2010 ? #1157106
    dailee1
    Participant

    Miles aircraft

    Nobody has referred to the two “Miles” built aircraft which are (sadly) only being restored to Display condition. The Miles M100 Student, must surely be close to completion at the Musem of Berkshire Aviation at Reading, and the Miles buillt B206X at Shoreham was looking resplendent in a new coat of “Beagle Bronze” when I last looked in on the hangar:):)

    in reply to: Listing the REALLY BIG aircraft #1144152
    dailee1
    Participant

    LARGE Aircraft

    You may not agree as to whether they are aircraft, but what about the Soviet Ekranoplans, They certainly took off but only had a ceiling under 100 ft.
    Surely this qualifies them as aircraft?

    in reply to: Guppy To Die #1142067
    dailee1
    Participant

    It doesn’t help in this particulr case, but isn’t there a Guppy preserved in the States at Pima Air Museum?, Tucson, Arizona
    I believe it to be a Stratocruiser/C97 version
    Dai Lee

    in reply to: British Airshows – Change & Originality #1141732
    dailee1
    Participant

    Airshow Displays

    There seems to be some sort of mythical belief that without a Tornado performing a full aerobatics routine, there would be nothing to see but it just isn’t true. Aircraft taking-off, landing, performing a fly by or whatever is just as interesting, indeed more interesting than being fobbed-off by wing walkers or gliders.

    I for one am getting fed up with seeing a fast jet doing a high speed run down the display line followed by a slow run and a couple of flick-rolls on the return.

    I would like to see more displays on the lines of Major “Boy” Soons RNethAF in the Fokker Military F27 Friendship whom I saw at the last IAT at Greenham Common. The PA commentator said “He never takes off, He merely retracts the undercarriage”, as he flew the length of the runway at (in my estination) no more than 50 feet. On reaching 1 000 feet he feathered one engine and flew the rest of his display on one engine. Not an operational requirement perhaps, but extremely exciting to watch, and that is why I go to Airshows.

    in reply to: raf museum #1127895
    dailee1
    Participant

    Hendon reigns OK

    turn the lights on for a month!! then close it down move everything to cosford

    What about us poor sods in the South then. To do Cosford properly means an overnight stay on the way up. and probably again on the way back. Granted that we have Duxford in a days trip, but the Spouthern branch of the RAF Museum should stay in Hendon
    Dai

    in reply to: What Are You All Reading Now! #1127845
    dailee1
    Participant

    Just hfinishede reading “Bomb Alley” by David Yates: a ratings view ofthe Falklands affair. Next in the schedule is “Winkle” Brown’s “Wings on my sleeve””

    in reply to: What Is The Ugliest Plane? #1101518
    dailee1
    Participant

    Among the Paper aircraft, I recall someone about 15 years ago in “Pilot” magazine doing a feature on the evolution of the perfect aircraft according to the rules of Burt Rutan. It went through about 15 to 20 iterations eventually finishing up resembling a Focke-Wulf 189 with asymmetric wings, and an offset pod for payload

    It looked hideous but there were good reasons for the changes made for each iteration

    in reply to: What Is The Ugliest Plane? #1101095
    dailee1
    Participant

    Thanks Daz, I never could get my german manufacturers correct
    Dai

    in reply to: Reverse Thrust Hunter F6 #1095745
    dailee1
    Participant

    i Gget the impression tha it was a proof of concept installation. I don’t think Sir Sydney Cqmm would have approved an implicit suggestion that the Hunter was inadequate and braking needed assistence from reverse thrust

    in reply to: Reverse Thrust Hunter F6 #1094914
    dailee1
    Participant

    I have some pictu.res taken during itrial installation that I obtained from the Visitor Centre at Shoreham Airport

    in reply to: Reverse Thrust Hunter F6 #1094787
    dailee1
    Participant

    I unearthed the attached pictures in the Visitor Centre at Shoreham Airport while researching data on the operations of F.G. Miles Ltd.

    in reply to: Reverse Thrust Hunter F6 #1094002
    dailee1
    Participant

    [QUOTE=pagen01;1 have you done any research etc on Miles Ellectronics at Shoreham?[/QUOTE]

    Yes I was an apprentice at FG Miles Ltd and worked for FG Miles Engineering from Feb 1966 till Singer bought Miles Electronics in September 1969, when I was transferred to Link-Miles

    I am researching for a pamphlet on the products of the Miles Group of Companies, which includes a section on the devices built by MILES Electronics
    If you have any specific queries mail me and I will endeavour to answer them

    Dai Lee (Mech Design)

    in reply to: AW101 Merlin #2297948
    dailee1
    Participant

    Merlins vs NH90

    Thank you Freehand for your reply.

    I was wondering how Merlin sales compared with NH 90 sales

    Dai Lee

    dailee1
    Participant

    Pilot displaying Aircraft

    Can I offer three

    Major Boy Soons RNLAF Flying F27 Troopship

    Ian Forbes flying Miles HDM 105

    Ranald Porteous displaying any Auster

    Dai

    in reply to: Nimrod MR4 Simulators #1015187
    dailee1
    Participant

    Simulators for preservation

    [QUOTE=Bruce;1895484]Problem is that there is no reason for RAFM to acquire these, as they didnt enter service with the RAF.[/QUOTE

    Point taken, but how often does the opportunity to acquire a state of the art flight simulator arise.

    If indoor space is a problem then JaguarV, Jetstream T!, Lynx AH7, all the Tornadoes and 2 Harrier GR 7/ simulators came in self contained buildings which only require a concrete hardstanding. (I can foresee a problem moving the 26ft dia visual dome for the Harriers, but that is another story)

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 137 total)