dark light

flyingcloggie

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 263 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WARBIRDs at Dijon-Darois(F) #537094
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    Pics of FW190 assembled at Dijon-Darois.

    ARAman

    http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/5979/fw1901photocaraqu6.jpg

    http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/117/fw1902photocarahx0.jpg

    http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/1856/fw1903photocaraki8.jpg

    http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/8329/fw1904photocarahh8.jpg

    http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/143/fw1905photocaraei1.jpg

    When are they hoping to have it up and flying?

    in reply to: New Ju.52 in the UK? #1316250
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    Does anyone knows which unit the registration belongs to? I see that there is no swatsika at the tailfin, will it stay like this or will they paint it later?

    Best regards,

    Mathieu

    They ran out of black paint!!!!

    in reply to: Dutch Hunter operations upcoming? #1318157
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    Don’t think its the Dutch airforce historical flight. There was talk that Skyline aviation is going to operate it. They also operate a few L-39’s.

    in reply to: New Ju.52 in the UK? #1249157
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    [That’s corect. I should have been more clear: she’s owned and operated by the Neptune Association, but operationally and for publicity she’s practically Aviodromes’. If Aviodrome were running an airline, the PBY would be on wet-lease: aircraft, maintenance and crew provided by the owner, but handling and pax by the Aviodrome.[/QUOTE]

    And you mean by SNA the Stichting Catalina PH-PBY?

    in reply to: New Ju.52 in the UK? #1249889
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    It doesn’t, unless Aviodrome decided that the aircraft carrier Karel Doorman, or even Dutch naval aviation as a whole is also a key part of the post-war era. As far as I know, they did not, but Aviodrome DOES in fact have a lot of ex-Marine Luchtvaartdienst (MLD) types in the inventory. A Neptune is almost comletely restored (albeit not officially airworthy), there is a PBY-5A flying, and several other ex-MLD aircraft are also property of Aviodrome. There are other former military types too, such as a complete MiG-21.

    Aviodrome only relatively recently decided on the new strategy. It’ll take some time before airframes will be traded for better fitting other airframes. They may be interesting offerings that do not fit the strategy. There may be offerings that require input from third parties. These things take time. You cannot expect the best offer if you just put the aircraft up for sale at eBay. That’s not how museums work.

    Have to correct you on the Catalina, it is not owned by the aviodrome. But its infact owned by an other organisation.

    in reply to: New Ju.52 in the UK? #1250946
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    The Spit was a direct part, but the military theme is already adressed (and very well I might add) by the RNLAF Historical Flight and the Military Aviation Museum (MLM) at Kamp Zeist (near Soesterberg AB).

    Don’t get confused: The two major themes at Aviodrome are not “Civil, as long as it is Fokker”, it is “Civilian aviation”, and “Fokker”. That leaves many more options: The history and fleets of KLM, Martinair, Transavia and smaller aviation companies would fit within the “civilian aviation” theme, allowing for the foreign DC-2 (two examples: PH-AJU “Uiver”, the sole flying DC-2 in the world, and an ex-RAAF example), DC-3/C-47 and DC-4/C-54, Lockeed L-749, Caravelle (cockpit section only) and Boeing-747, but the “Fokker” theme would allow (para-)military types like Starfighter, F-16, F-27Martime and S.11 also.
    btw: when I say Fokker, I should make it clear that Fokker was not the only Dutch aircraft manufacturer; Spyker (that’s right, the company of the Formula1 racing team), Koolhoven, Pander and others were also building aircraft, but Fokker is by far the largest name.

    Focussing on these two subjects would prevent the Aviodrome from having “alien” types with no direct relationship to the Netherlands. An aircraft like the Koolhoven F.K. 23 Bantam (built in 1919, restoration completed in 2003, original) should be in the Netherlands for instance, just like a Fokker F.VII, the aircraft that made the world’s first intercontinental revenue flight from Amsterdam to Batavia (now Jakarta).

    As for having to build replicas: there is still plenty around the world to be added to the existing collection. For instance: the frame and pilot’s seat of Fokker F.8 PH-AED/PJ-AED (ex-KLM “Duif”) were recovered from the jungles of Venezuela, and are now stored pending restauration/rebuilt at Aviodrome. They are the only remains of a Fokker F.8 in the world. Same thing for a Fokker B.4 (stored pending restauration) flying boat. Same thing for an incomplete Fokker S.4 (on display, pending restauration to airworthy condition). A Fokker-built “replica” (1994, with original engine) of the Fokker F.2 (the first purpose-built airliner in the world) is on display. A Pander glider is on display. Many pre-war types may be lying about anywhere on the planet, as Fokker was THE aircraftmanufacturer of the 1920s and early 30s.

    Post-war: Aviodrome currently has two N.H.I. Kolibri helicopters (including the prototype) and a Alsema Sagitta (the only Dutch series-produced performance-)glider, a Fokker S.11 Instructor, the prototype S-12 Instructor (series produced in Brazil), Fokker S.13 (one built, two pieces remaining: a cockpit section at the small museum at Texel Airport, and a tailsection at Aviodrome), a S.14 Machtrainer (world’s first purpose-built jet-trainer), three Fokker F.27 Friendships (1st (fuselage only) and 3rd prototype on display and 1st production example airworthy) and a Fokker50 (2nd prototype, on display) but is still short on a few post WW-II types: Fokker F.25 Promotor (20 built, 2 flown, no survivors known), Fokker F.28 Fellowship, Fokker60U, Fokker70, Fokker100 (although a cockpit section is at the museum), and a Fokker/VFW-614.

    As you can see: there is plenty to be restored, and plenty to be discovered. The Netherlands may physically not be large in size, it’s aircraft manufacturing history certainly is. Fokker was one of the last original names in Europe. It’s aircraft were sold in fairly large numbers worldwide, both before and after the war. The F.27 for instance, was the best selling turbo-prop airliner ever.

    You are talking about Fokker and civilian, where does the firefly fit in?

    in reply to: ME 109 at Biggin Hill? #1257070
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    It might well be possible that it will come over. Been looking at the website, and the are in the final stages of the repairs. The wings are already on, the engine was not damaged during the” not so succesfull” landing.

    in reply to: ME 109 at Biggin Hill? #1257074
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    As I’ve already stated further up the thread – D-FEHD (the ex-Dittes aircraft) was operated in the UK for a short time. 😉

    Would be great to see it in the UK. Don’t think the other 2 will come to the UK.

    in reply to: ME 109 at Biggin Hill? #1257086
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    Well, it flew for a bit, before succumbing to the ‘109’s unfortunate trait of difficult ground-handling (if I remember rightly).

    Currently well on its way to flying again, however.

    http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/976/meplakatklein23pp.jpg

    http://www.me-air-company.de/

    Its not the same machine, rote 7 is privatly owned, while the former Hans Dites one is now owned by the messerschmitt trust.

    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    I believe Grayfly meant that the postage killer is the new rate for A4 size envelopes in which Fighter Log is posted.

    I understand talking to someone today that amongst other things the new system will make the process of subscription renewal notification more efficient and will trial the idea of email notification, where that information exists.

    Best way is to give people a choice, receive the fighter log as a hard copie ore by email. Want to receive a hard, they have to pay extra to cover the cost for postage.

    in reply to: ME 109 at Biggin Hill? #1258103
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    That would be a real show stopper. Who cares if it was a Merlin engined 109, now its got the real engine.

    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    In this day and age, a reminder can be sent by email. I know not every one has got his email listed, but am sure a lot have. That is a quick way to save a lot of money. Mhh and I work for a postal company.

    Herman

    in reply to: Any news on the Wattisham 109E #1270910
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    Going state wise in june juli. Ending up in the Seattle erea, so hoping to see it then. Has the collection by then moved to Paine field?

    Herman

    in reply to: 8 fots from Thursday 8th at RNAS Yeovilton… #1278105
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    The other Hunter was the subject of my visit – Northern Lights’ Hunter F.58 C-GZIC which was making a short visit to the UK from a location in mainland Europe.

    Where is this Hunter based?

    in reply to: Israeli Air Force Museum Spitfires and Mustangs #1278110
    flyingcloggie
    Participant

    What about the Catalina that was supous to fly from the UK to the Israeli Air Force Museum? I know it got stuck in France on the way to it.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 263 total)