dark light

f4

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 117 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lanc NX611 & Seafire VP441 #2092396
    f4
    Participant

    Maybe not useful, but my earliest aviation memory is sitting in NX611’s rear turret one summer’s day at Lavenham (was either ’69 or ’70) and the control tower being stuffed full of model aeroplanes – it certainly fired an eight year old’s enthusiasm and probably led to my unhealthy obsession with aeroplanes!

    in reply to: Red Arrows Flypast 17th December #2092937
    f4
    Participant

    The flypast was for the RAF Museum at Hendon, don’t think the Thames was ever on the route.

    in reply to: Memphis Belle film-Any photos or memories of it #2094669
    f4
    Participant

    Getting back to the Memphis Belle, here’s a quick look at the filming – http://www.f4aviation.co.uk/Oldstuff/belle/belle.htm

    in reply to: Shackelton for sale……again! #2113540
    f4
    Participant

    Having personally spoken to Mike Collett before Coventry’s airshow, nearly everything was in place for the Shack to come across but it was paperwork Stateside that was the problem. He was very confident that it would make it over here in ’04. So, fingers crossed!

    in reply to: Time for a 'Special' ! #2122504
    f4
    Participant

    I’d vote for the Manchester.

    I’m still gobsmacked that Gibson’s aircraft survived the war and was unceremoniously scrapped at Scampton in 1947. We need to ensure a similar fate doesn’t happen to more modern types with a historic mission history – Vulcan XM607 for example, by no means with a secure future.

    in reply to: Any news on the Blenheim ? #2123505
    f4
    Participant

    It was very much in the same place and in the same state today as it was at the airshow a couple of weeks ago.

    in reply to: Incident at Leuchars #2080567
    f4
    Participant

    http://www.f4aviation.co.uk/airshow03/leuchars/tonka.jpg

    The panel ‘popped’ off during a high-g pull-up – apparently the GR version is prone to this as it flexes slightly during violent manoeuvers! The panel had to be repaired by Luftwaffe personnel, so that’s why they couldn’t just pinch one off another jet. There may have been damage to the mountings as well.

    in reply to: First Duxford report #2084365
    f4
    Participant

    You obviously left too early – the F3 did a full display just before 5pm!

    The impending thunderstorm also persuaded me to leave when the Reds were on – did Christian Moullec and his geese get airborne?

    in reply to: Blenheim Accident #2091578
    f4
    Participant

    From speaking to one of the crew at Coventry I seem to recall him saying that ARC have a Mk 1 nose complete and ready to install – maybe this will enable a swifter re-build? Anyone know any more?

    in reply to: Another RIAT post… #2096083
    f4
    Participant

    Thought the title of this thread very apt…

    …at long last a review of the flying programme can be seen at Air-Scene UK – every act!

    in reply to: Airshow attendance #2098959
    f4
    Participant

    I think you’ll find there are lies, damn lies and airshow attendance figures. If you count everyone in the Lowestoft area on the day you’ll get 200,000, but those that are genuinely there for just the airshow will be a tad less methinks – Mildenhall were notorious for guessing at crowd levels, the mythical 500,000 for the 2001 show being a classic case. 150,000 was probably nearer the mark – with maybe 350,000 stuck in the queues outside!

    in reply to: North Weald Threatened #2101320
    f4
    Participant

    Don’t blame Atkins, they’re just the consultant employed by the client (Epping Forest DC). The problem with North Weald is that it’s too close to Stansted and Stapleford for sustained aviation/GA and is a large chunk of land that brings little revenue into Epping’s coffers. You only have to see what has happened to Ipswich Airport to know that there is little hope of salvation. As for the historic aspect, the existing airfield is largely post-war and so stands little chance of gaining any protected status. Brownfield sites such as this are favoured by the planners as you just replace one type of nuisance with something less contentious.

    in reply to: Lancaster NX611 #2101337
    f4
    Participant

    Seems to me the Pantons are missing a trick here – there must be plenty of folk who would pay a fiver to see her do that again. I’m not sure what the difficulties are in using the old runway (maybe they don’t own it?) and of course insurance would be an issue, but it would certainly bring in some useful revenue.

    in reply to: Flying Legends review… #2101436
    f4
    Participant

    Just hit refresh…:D

    in reply to: Legends! #2106186
    f4
    Participant

    You can expect some spirited flying!

    http://www.f4aviation.co.uk/airshow03/legends/la9low.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 117 total)