In the coming years IAFs ODL (Operational Data Link) will allow all its air assets to communicate with each other and ground based surveilance/defences. Imagine non emitting Rafales sneaking behind the Super 30s making use of the Su 30s larger radars, sharing SPECTRA information with Su 30 etc.
MM Rafale.
Apologies for the borderline incoherent booze soaked rant from last night, what I meant was:-
-Bringing in pvt players is not going to bring a difference in a world of difference overnight.
-Merging or bringing a particular drdo establishment with the respective dpsu in that field (say DRDL with BDL) under the same management to form a MI complex should take care of a lot of project management and oroduct development woes.
-None of the big Indian pvt players coming in today have a history of r&d. They are trying to buy off smaller r&d establishments or the researches necessary for the job in hand which is fine as long as they are not handling anything turnkey, in which case they will have to depend on internal r&d. You can hire the best available manpower, but can’t buy the organisational work culture. All this “buying off” the technology and base research (because you don’t expect them to spend 20 years plus researching for the next gen engine, you want it in ten) has to be accounted for in the IRR, and the moment the IRR sheet output for a particular project hovers precariously close to a minimum benchmark the management has set, these companies will abandon the project.I think we should abandon this never ending discussion now before m’pacha or s.o.c strike down on this thread with their powers of moderation 🙂
This is why I suggest division & Auction of all DPSUs to private players. In that way it will make up for the private industries’ lack of experience in certain areas while newer management and work culture will benefit the likes of HAL.
DPSUs basically create two big problems that hurts the R&D effort.
1. As their jobs are secure they don’t have to work hard to keep them. A private establishment where you get fired if you fall below a certain threshold will keep everyone on their toes.
2. There is little incentive to work hard, promotions are done based on seniority and all that, and the pay is pea nuts compared to what engineers/R&D teams in most other countries, privatisation will increase salaries and more work/break through will be rewarded with better pay, promotions and other incentives.
😎
I miss S.O.C 🙁
Only leaks but I won’t dismiss them.
Obama abandoned India after Bush administrations super-friendly ways, India could not accept that. Here is hoping President Romney will continue the good work done by the Great George W. Bush.
May be 80 options will be there to reward Americans if they play their cards right.
Its not harsh, its clear that on many issues the Air Force & HAL/ADA don’t see eye to eye. Air Chiefs while in service downplays it and praises HAL but once they retire the truth emerges, Krishnaswamy,F.H Major, Tyagi all same in that count.
We should Privatize it all with 49% foreign investment from friendly nations.
I sorta concur on your ‘blame game’ comments, because Typhoon’s loss is entirely Jeremy Clarkson’s fault- OFF WITH HIS HEAD!!
Could be true that Indians are notorious at taking offense for the smallest of things. The Top Gear India special certainly did not go down well.
This somewhat throwaway comment has sparked quite some discussion. Would you care to supply the source of your assertation?
look at the comments as well.
http://www.liberation.fr/economie/01022387046-reactions-sur-dassault-va-vendre-126-rafales-a-l-inde
I read that the French people ain’t that happy about the deal, they fear job losses and so and so. May be people in the Typhoon partner nations would have been more grateful.
Kinda would be weird if an arms deal with a country ruins the relationship between our people and theirs.
That theory failed the Litmus test last time around.
Not sure what you are babbling about, to be frank. Or how Pakistani “desperation” will cause them to make up a balance with the Indians.
Obviously other assets come to play in war (love to hear the “desperation” one though) but it does nothing to negate a huge equipment deficiency.
The more desperate they are or are perceived to be by India, the more cautious India will be at a war.
If things go Nuclear India has more to lose than Pakistan. Remember the Bond Villain in World is Not Enough ??
That’s because you’re looking at numbers on paper rather than looking at how real wars (and fights in general) tend to pan out. Equipment is important, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. What plane is better isn’t going to make much of a difference in a war between India and Pakistan. Hopefully we won’t have to see how things work out in reality, it’s never pretty. The other reason you may not follow the logic of course is that it you don’t want to hear anything that you don’t like, shocking 😎
Partially that, yes, but also the simple fact that the Indians will be the majority force and will be having to take more care not to blast each other. For the Pakistanis, assuming they are losing from the outset, the stakes are much higher and so risks are worth taking, which may or may not pay off.
You are right on some counts but you are forgetting the deterrent value of a stronger Air Force equipped with Rafales with a license from the French to use it in whatever role necessary including Nuclear Strike
India has one thing going for her as well, she is perfectly happy with the borders as it is on the West and on the East so the onus is on Pak/China to make the first move not India.
Where is Scooter?
Wasn’t he predicting the choice of Rafale/Typhoon was just a ploy to make the US lower Superhornet price?
Don’t poke a dead man :dev2:
Scooter is all around us will ride in when the 80 F 35 orders are confirmed
:diablo:
Ain’t Brazil wanting an assembly line for a much smaller order than 80 ?
IMO the 80 may well be Gripens, IAFs insurance against LCA delays/failure.
Negligible impact I think. J-10B is China’s answer to MMRCA.
So you think Rafale is only as good as the J 10 B ?
:rolleyes: So sad coming from its great defender.
Ok, so what does this mean for the regional balance in airpower between China and India? Are we likely to see some form of response from China over the next few years or is it a negligible impact on the regional balance?
I don’t think its going to be negligible. Finally India has got something that has a good chance of penetrating Chinese Air Defenses along the Tibetan border in case of a localised War.
But via-vis Pakistan this is a big thing if India can get these planes inducted at a decent pace I can’t see PAF lasting more than a few days in a conflict.
Yeah … the aircraft that’s unnecessary on account of LCA vs. the aircraft that’s unnecessary on account of AMCA. Tough call that one.
You are right at this point it makes sense to order more Rafale. But if the news is true that is not happening in that case one could assume two things.
1. India want to buy a U.S jet to please Uncle Sam.
2. A cheaper aircraft to keep things in balance, as obligatory pointed out the F 414 is already being ordered, Meteor can be used with Rafale as well so it may not be a logistical Nightmare to order 80 Gripen.
3. If that part of the news is true, Rafale and Eurofighter won’t be considered for the follow on order.