dark light

quadbike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 3,473 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2373674
    quadbike
    Participant

    So what ? ToT is like recording companies purchasing ip rights from an artist.

    Illegal copying is Limewire/pirate bay etc. There is a difference.

    in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2373773
    quadbike
    Participant

    needless to say the whole schpew about “own efforts” only live in ardent nationalist like you.

    Its certainly a quality, not doing something that is wrong even if doing it could really help you.

    Idealism vs Pragmatism I guess.

    in reply to: Rafale news part XI #2373775
    quadbike
    Participant

    India could go either way or a third way IMO. And I won’t put a time frame on Indian decision making.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2030703
    quadbike
    Participant

    F 35 is on offer to India (originally Tango IIIs post)

    Pentagon confirms F-35 offer to India.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2374294
    quadbike
    Participant

    Ah Dogfights of the 21st century 🙂

    Add a few MIG 31s armed with R 33s to that group of Su 30s and the Lancers will be in big trouble 🙂

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2374297
    quadbike
    Participant

    Ain’t there 2 x 40 odd orders, the first 40 order to purchase from Russia directly and the more recent one for 42 AC ?

    They look well built indeed

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-o0iAYbGbbj8/TrDo6QXHteI/AAAAAAAAAbs/JqkXTt6eFmc/s1600/su1.jpg

    in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2374313
    quadbike
    Participant

    A Naval J 10 would have been a much riskier proposition, when you have no problem copying a proven Naval fighter especially.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2374315
    quadbike
    Participant

    Honestly, mark my words, FGFA will be much much closer to PAK-FA than some people suspect. And that is a good thing.

    I think Indian FGFA will carry the meteor & Astra 🙂

    I also think the SW codes etc may be different.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2374355
    quadbike
    Participant

    That is pure nonsense and fantasy. Russia is making a definitive PAK-FA, Indian money or no Indian money.

    People seem to have this misguided idea the FGFA will be what the Su-30MKI was to the original Flanker.

    Whoever that blog poster is, he is drinking some Indian nationalistic coolaid, that’s for sure.

    I think India expects that at the very least. I think Indian FGFA may not be necessarily better than the Russian one, but it would be different in a few aspects including long range AAMs.

    If its just purchase of a Russian fighter it won’t make any sense, the only reason to choose the FGFA over the F 35 is ToT, work share, source codes and all that. I doubt the programme will hold a candle to the American jet if you take fighter vs fighter only.

    I don’t mean Aerodynamic performance before anyone jumps on that, sensor fusion, avionics, radar etc.

    😉

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2374359
    quadbike
    Participant

    Killer bean your news should be put in bold for people who think India is not being offered the F 35. Its on offer its up to us if we want it or not.

    I feel vindicated.

    “Should India indicate interest in the JSF, the United States would be prepared to provide information on the JSF and its requirements,” including on security and infrastructure, the Defense Department said today in a congressionally mandated report on U.S.-India security cooperation.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2374566
    quadbike
    Participant

    Seems these guys here know more than LM execs Spud, & the USG and so on.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2374605
    quadbike
    Participant

    [QUOTE]

    1) LM is not the owner on an FMS sale – The government of the US is
    2) US govt has to approve the export – LM can do nothing without their permission
    3) A fair amount of the tech developed is by the existing partners – LM cannot pass on that technology without the IP rights of those partners. LM would have to jump through significant amount of loops themselves if they have to offer JSF production line to India. I cannot see LM offering either of the following tech : engine, radar, EO sensors, RAM or some of the worlds most advanced machining tools that can create components to an extremely low tolerance.

    The rules to sell to India are the same to sell to anyone else outside the JSF partners.

    Without the state departments approval, there is no sales offer on JSF. India has not rejected JSF because it needs to be on offer first.

    1. Who said LM is the owner but the FMS approval is all but a formality.

    2. Again LM is talking with USG blessings. Boeing offered the SH only after Bush said it in 2005 not before.

    3. If U.S can get the NSG to approve the Nuke Deal for India a non NPT signatory it can get its junior partners to accept this as well.

    4. Individual deals may differ.

    5. The Approval & DCSA notification comes only when there is a near surety of sale as in the case of C 17, C 130 and Appaches. There was no notification for the Super Hornet or Viper, so if and when the deal nears the above State Dept approval/DCSA notification to congress etc will come with it.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2374641
    quadbike
    Participant

    I am more interested in his claims on PAK FA to be honest. He is coming up with an article about it soon.

    I happen to know a great deal about the PAK-FA programme. And you’ll have to wait to read about it, which I promise will happen soon.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2374642
    quadbike
    Participant

    The logic seems to be with partner nations considering cuts in procurement an Indian order will help the Americans a lot, using that leverage to get some ToT and early production slots.

    He only talks about delivery dates, F 35 will take ages to mature compared to something like the Rafale.

    Oh do give me a link where it says IN has stuck with PAK FA N ?

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2374649
    quadbike
    Participant

    “Omnirole” Rafale Steals Lead Over Eurofighter Typhoon in Libyan Operations

    While NATO forces fielded the Dassault Rafale and the Eurofighter Typhoon in the UN-mandated war against Gaddafi’s forces in Libya, details emerging from briefings by the U.K. and French air forces about the use of their respective fighters tell that the Rafale was the primary attack plane while the Eurofighter Typhoon provided intelligence through its targeting pods.

    With the Libyan hostilities over, the Rafale and the Eurofighter Typhoon face off one another in an estimated $11 billion tender for India’s Medium Multirole Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) acquisition, the price bids for which are scheduled to be opened in the first week of November.

    The Rafale, which is yet to receive an international order, has never come so close to finding a foreign customer. The Dassault fighter made the shortlist along with the Eurofighter Typhoon after a nearly two year evaluation of European, American and Russian fighters.

    No sooner than NATO announced a no-fly zone over the Rebel stronghold of Benghazi in Libya earlier this year, French Rafale and Mirage 2000 jets zoomed across the Mediterranean sea attacking Libyan ground-based military targets, a move which many critics say was prompted to exhibit the French jet’s fighting capabilities to potential customers.

    Later at the Paris Air show in June 2011, French Air Force officials briefed the media about what the Rafale jets did in Libya. “The Omnirole” capabilities of the Rafale, meaning air-to-air, air-to-ground and intelligence gathering were used during missions. The Rafales had to scan the skies for fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters besides anti-aircraft missiles of Gaddafi’s forces and attack them during the same mission. Often the mission profile had to be modified during an operation as fresh intelligence emerged of the enemy’s offensive assets.

    The Rafale armaments for the Libyan operations included two infrared and two active radar radio frequency MBDA Mica air-to-air missiles mounted on the wingtips and wing root of the plane. The IR seekers on the missiles act as stealthy sensors. For ground attack, there were four Raytheon GBU-12 Paveway 2 laser-guided bombs. French pilots have dropped more than 100 GBU-12 weapons in Libya, officers said. A Thales Damocles laser targeting pod under the wing allows the pilot to achieve precise targeting. A Nexter 30mm canon is fitted on the Rafale for close ground attack.

    On different missions the Rafales also carried the Sagem Smart Bomb Unit with GPS/INS guidance. The guided propelled bomb has a 60-kilometer range. The French Air Force also fired 10 MBDA Scalp cruise missiles in deep strike missions, an Air Force officer had said during the briefing. In contrast, the UK Air Force deployed the Typhoon in a supporting role to its older generation aircraft, the Tornado. In a briefing about the Libyan operations, the UK’s Commander of Joint Operations (CJO), Air Marshal Sir Stuart Peach last week explained that the “complimentary way” in which the Typhoons worked alongside the Tornados, using their targeting pods to create additional intelligence and reconnaissance, “was very important”. The Tornados carried British-designed and British-built Brimstone missiles, which proved to be a world class weapon system, the Air Marshal was quoted as saying in a U.K MoD release. The Brimstone missile have been offered to India as part of the MMRCA weapons package.

    In separate briefings, U.K. officials have been quoted as saying that the Typhoon flew 600 combat missions but surprisingly details of its offensive role in terms of enemy targets engaged have not been forthcoming. A briefing was given to top Indian Air Force officials last month about the weapons used by the Eurofighter Tornado and Typhoon. Reports of the briefing tell that MBDA Brimstone air-to-surface missiles were launched from RAF’s Tornado GR4 fighters. In addition Storm Shadow missiles were fired from Tornado GR4s to destroy radar stations and anti-aircraft batteries. There has been no mention of what weapons the Typhoon carried.

    A Dassault executive who did not wish to be identified said that the Eurofighter Typhoon which is clearly not meant for a multi-mission role played at best a supporting role in the Libyan operations.

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 3,473 total)