They are saying 7.9 million per aircraft but that is probably 79 million. I think if this falls through, then that’s that for Rafale as well.
Where is the Su 34 news ?
Pretty worthless updating them over 9 years for that money. Come on MoF and MoD don’t give the IAF their way on this. Force them to accept an Israeli solution or order more MRCA/MKI/Tejas and retire the Mirages progressively.
They never had closed economies like Russia/India in the past, so the wage structure from that era don’t apply to them.
In India the DPSU scientists/engineers are really underpaid.
Can you put the thread number ?
Some here believe that NOKs sheer numbers will have some impact on the war. Cluster bombs my friends !!
*Mexico’s single squadron of F-5Es is based near the capital. It can’t do anything about drug smugglers overflying Yucatan.
For what defending Mexico city in case Americans decide to invade ? They are better used against drug smugglers.
What do Argentina need an airforce for if its not to defend its borders and fighting wars. They can just buy Super Tuccanos or some trainers with light attack if it only needs border policing.
If they are spending millions on fighters they should be capable in an event of War, and military planners do tend to think much further than their civilian coutner parts, for example the current govt. may want a peaceful resolution on the Falklands, a future one may just go for a conflict, in which case the Airforce would do much better with something like the Rafale/Su 30 than a Block 50/52.
Also discussion of the use of weapons in war is part and parcel of millitary aviation.
that was never the ‘original plan’ quad, I am pretty sure Air HQ does not share its plans with you. please do not pass off your opinion as fact (yet again).
the increase in tejas numbers is logical because that’s how IAF operates, I have been saying this from day 1.
That was the plan as isssued by ADA and posted on livefist. It was for 83 Tejas MK2s. He did say its mig 21++ and then backtracked possibly under pressure. May be his personal opinion remains the same but the position he sits in demands him to be more sensitive towards the indigenous Tejas.
Wait till he retires and starts writing on Force or India Strategic then what he thinks of it may be more clear cut.
What engine?
GE F404IN or GEF414 IN
The big problem with Russian or Chinese hardware is a complete lack of a support system. Everything here is incompatible with non western equipment. Surely a deal could be made, and it would make a lot of sense too, but it’s very unlikely.
May be India or China can be roped in for support I think the Malaysians and Indonesians are doing that now.
Atleast it will setle the Rafale vs Typhoon Argument in someones favour.
If they want something that is carrier capable/something that could challenge the Typhoon and the F 35, they should simply get Rafale M.
4-5 squadrons and Falklands War II can begin !!!!
you remember a certain someone here was 100% SURE that LCA would be capped at 100 ? 😀
That was the original plan anyway and also the chief called Tejas a MIG 21++. May be he’s a bit mellowed now as he is nearing retirement.
The increase in Tejas numbers is logical because they selected a twin engined fighter for the MRCA.
😉
Its true though and applies to India as well. You cannot have an open market economy and socialist era wages. Will invariably result in brain drain.
However not necessarily to China as the West may be a more lucrative destination to live.
Tejas 🙂
Indian Su 30s are not that much affected by the spares problem largely because most thigns are built in India now. The only issue they mentioned was wrt tyres.
Su 30 MKI/MKM or Su35s will lick all of the above mentioned fighters (may be bar the Gripen NG) in A2A combat and will pose a good threat vs the Typhoons.
Actually they are the sensible choice.
The Su 34 looks a poorly built product (i mean’t the finishing and looks not the capability), the Su 35s/FGFA/MIG 29K etc look much better.