Not what I meant. The original suggestion was that Brazil might wait for the result of MRCA selection, & that’s what I was referring to, not any joint decision. I can see how it might be misinterpreted once the context was lost, though.
IAF wants the MRCA very quickly and will not delay it anyfurther.
But can you imagine the consequences of combining them, by making one dependent on the other? 😮
I doubt India has any such plans. Especially as Brazil has some defensive cooperation with Pakistan (selling Missiles etc.).
I think Rafale is deployed in Afghanistan while Typhoon is/was not.
Almost non-existent. The Brazilians can’t really be that stupid. They must know that Indian procurement bureaucracy is so slow & unpredictable that they could end up waiting until everyone concerned has retired or died.
If anything FX and FX-2 is worse than the MRCA circus.
India ?
Originally posted by Upandaway at mp.net
Presentation on Gripen flight-testing from a conference in India this January
Starts around 1:20:00
http://aeroindialive.nic.in/show_ondemand.asp?id_episode=4&id_part=4
According to this Honeywell Ad the Jaguar will be really potent with its new engines.
He is doubting whether HAL can assimilate ToT and manufacturing techniques provided as part of the deal. He is underestimating HAL. In other cases the above is true, MDL has had a tough time assimilating submarine tech from France as part of the Scorpene deal.
They did not commit a howler, they talked amongst themselves about the issue in what was supposed to be a confidential cable.
If you have Wiki leaks for other countries, similar stuff many come out there as well.
I see — so in your opinion few if any delays in politics or such will influence the MRCA deliveries? I’m wondering if the countries who own the varying aerospace companies will lodge a complaint against the final ruling calling unfairness or such — I mean it’s a big contract for 126 aircraft and maybe even 260… I find it hard to believe the country’s and company’s which lose out won’t attempt to influence the final decision, if that is even possible.
Yeah, it’s just that you said “Whatever edge China has in SRBMS will go away once this enters service,” which we both seem to agree won’t happen.
Actually it is possible and the IAF ACM has accounted for it in his latest interview. But recently the courts act sensibly when it comes to defense related litigations, there was an air force runway modernization deal where the loser went to court and I think the case was thrown out. Even accounting for the delay you can at max add one year.
I was talking from a technology standpoint. The Shaurya is a leap in terms of missile tech for the Indian Armed Forces. Its canistarised and easily transportable and has a small logistical footprint compared to the Prithvi and Agni variants in service now.
Yeah definitely, but it’s not like with the induction of Shaurya (while seeming a formidable system) will magically even out the tables in terms of SRBMs nor IRBMs.
—–
I’ve read that the deal should be done by July this year… What do people think of this timescale? Not wanting to generalise, but a good number of these programmes get delayed, and India isn’t exactly that speedy with their own procurement based on previous examples and I have a feeling politics may delay the final contract.
The MRCA would be concluded this year, conflicting reports ranging from July to September and the delivery will start 3 years from signing the contract.
I think everything should be in place by early next decade. Most systems in the works should be online by middle-end of this decade but by the start of the next decade India will have sufficient numbers as well. Most importantly India’s Nuclear triad will be well in place.
And India need not even the tables to offer a good deterrent and strike back with enough damage.
couple of craters on some fwd field is one thing.
dozens of deep craters blanket a field and sprayed with cluster munition and sensor fused weapons is something else.
Glad that you mentioned it. India is buying 512 GBU-105 sensor fused weapons. These could be carried by the MRCA and the existing aircraft.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/Video/89002/42/India+to+acquire+CBU-105+bombs,+Harop.html
fyi, with all due respect I did not bring this line of questions up. :dev2:
he did want those Jags to fly into china.
Actually Jaguars are more suited for the plains than altitude, so more effective in the western border. I was replying to people commenting that they are obsolete, which is far from the case.
that reminds me something.
In 2008 during the earth quake in Sichuan.
PLAAF launched its AWACS to act as air traffic controller for all traffic civil and military in the entire area.
its radar was able to track rescue helicopter flying in the gullies. and allow them to fly in near zero vis conditions.
It will all boil down to tactics and how an asset is used at the end of the day. All the MRCA contenders will be detected by AWACS as well.
That’s the same load, just for a shorter range and 90% in the past maybe, but not with PLAAF and PAF fielding BVR capable fighters with AWACS support!
No matter what, if there is another war, or areal conflict and you send out a strike package, they have to defend themselfs and not only with WVR missiles.
Btw, Mig 27 are on the way to be phased out, only a few squads will be upgraded and the problems with reliability should be obvious.
The Jaguars doing a terrain following low level strike mission can be very hard to intercept. They can also be escorted.
In this video there is a comment from Americans who trained with British Jaguars in Red Flag.
Looks like IAF already has an aircraft that can operate from highways and bad airstrips.