dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 6,631 through 6,645 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2026984
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.lenta.ru/news/2012/01/23/nerpa/
    At a ceremony at “zvezda” shipyard, the Nerpa has been handed over to India.

    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.lenta.ru/news/2012/01/23/yaks/

    Russia sells Syria 36 Yak-130 for 550 million dollars.
    Yak-130 really starting to sell, between Russia, Belorussia, Algeria, Vietnam and now Syria.
    Also probably shows that Syria is intent on remaining important enough for Russia to keep backing/Russia doesn’t want another loss of income like Libya.

    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=74119

    A good post, a summary of 2011 for the BBC. Nothing really new, but nevertheless:

    Production:

    Yak-130: 8 (4 in 2010)
    Su-27SM3: 12 (4 Su-30M2 in 2010)
    Su-35S: 2
    PAK-FA: 2
    Su-34: 6 (4 in 2010)
    An-140: 1
    Tu-214: 1

    Modernization

    MiG-31BM: numbers undisclosed.
    Su-25SM: numbers undisclosed.
    A-50U: 1

    Overhaul:

    Tu-142M3: 1
    Tu-95MS: 1
    Il-76MD: Several
    An-124: 2 returned to service

    in reply to: MMRCA news XI #2359026
    TR1
    Participant

    Taiwan could be a good possible customer, but France lacks the gonads to **** off China.

    You mean France is smart enough to not spoil a much more profitable relationship with an economic giant.

    TR1
    Participant

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/149476.html

    Irkut’s accomplishments in 2011, in the field of combat aircraft exports:

    -16 Yak-130 to Algeria, from the 2006 contract.
    -8 Su-30MKA to Algeria, the first from the additional order of 16 aircraft in 2010.
    -6 Su-30MKI to India, fully completed airframes, from the additional contract for 40 airframes signed in 2007.
    -10 Su-30MKI kits to India.

    Size of Irkut production in 2011 was 55 billion rubles.

    in reply to: Su-25 Frogfoot #2359685
    TR1
    Participant

    x2 on the last part JSR. yet another reason UAVs won’t make Su-25 obsolete in Russia for years.

    http://217.112.37.94/graph/art_full/13270107518686.jpg
    Love it.

    in reply to: Su-25 Frogfoot #2359706
    TR1
    Participant

    I realize that the plummet of the Russian population has dissipated and leveled off. That’s what is important.

    in reply to: Su-25 Frogfoot #2359738
    TR1
    Participant

    So the fact that is shrunk, makes it shrinking?

    Not seeing your point. Predictions about Russia’s population demise are old. That top chart is laughable.

    http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2011/10/24/russia-demographic-update-7/

    People looked at trends in the 90s and posted much “Russia’s population is goign to fall by 50 million by 2050!” nonsense. The Muslim majority talk belongs in the same category.

    Anwyays, massive OT.

    in reply to: Su-25 Frogfoot #2359790
    TR1
    Participant

    Russia’s population isn’t shrinking.

    When the Su-34 enters numbers this decade the Su-25 will be obsolete? No way.
    And no, those fantasy UAVs to replace it won’t be mature/common enough either. Are they the eventual future? Yes. In the next 15-20 years? Existing Su-25 will be better choice for what Russia needs to do with them.

    PAK-DA + PAK-FA > Su-34 and UAVs.
    Maybe, but pointless either way.

    in reply to: Rise of the Sea Gripen #2027021
    TR1
    Participant

    RD-33 has better fuel efficiency than the f404 and the M88 in dry thrust AFAIK.
    Worse with AB, but then again, is more powerful than either.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2027023
    TR1
    Participant

    I wonder why the Russian Navy seems to have chosen conventional landing boats over more capable hovercraft designs like the Zubr. More economical?

    Yep, by far. Caspian doesn’t need anything as fancy as air-cushion designs anyways.

    As for the big fleets, we shall see. Ivan Gren progress is turtle-esque.

    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to64000/063786.jpg

    RuAF An-140.
    Looks nice!
    I was just lamenting this aircraft a year ago, it has a future.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 16 #2360274
    TR1
    Participant

    Just going by all your stupid logic. Thanks for confirming the stupidity of all your claims.

    What claims?

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 16 #2360308
    TR1
    Participant

    And is the West paying China for nearly every modern weapon having its basic origins in China? Before the West stole from China you guys were basically just chucking spears and shooting arrows at one another.

    If we are going down this stupid logical trail, let’s pay royalties for everything to African nations, after all, everything did come from them.

    in reply to: Quadbike Indian Air Force Thread Part 18 #2360825
    TR1
    Participant

    One of the knocked out contenders complains, and they re-tender? Wow.

Viewing 15 posts - 6,631 through 6,645 (of 9,195 total)