dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 6,706 through 6,720 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2365659
    TR1
    Participant

    I don’t know what exactly is on offer to the Indonesians for 470 million, but it reminds me of the situation of a year or two ago when the Indian AF were quoted almost 100 million per Su-30MKI in the latest production tranche.

    But that likely included other transfer deals including the Super-30 upgrade project. If we look at American export deals, per unit they can be obscenely expensive. It is explained away as part of a big package. WHy can’t this be the same case?

    in reply to: KF-X Question for you experts #2365661
    TR1
    Participant

    Frankly I’m surprised at your scepticism given that you must be aware that Indonesia is the single largest export market Russia is anticipating for PAK FA.

    And on that note — Russia and reading tea leaves — I’m reminded of the words of a superb (American) reader of tea leaves:

    — Jack London, 1909

    what?!? You are going to have to provide me with some links, because that sounds extremely unlikely. India is obviously going to be the largest export market foreseeable. Based on Su-30 purchases, there are quite a few candidates ahead of Indonesia as well, in terms of PAK-FA. Pretty sure they expect a dozen airframes at best before 2040 or so.

    Not sure what Japan-Russia 1905 have to do with anything as well.

    in reply to: KF-X Question for you experts #2365662
    TR1
    Participant

    fair enough, but will you even be around here 15-20 years? or go the way of GarrayB?

    The better question is, will this forum be around in 15-20 years? Hopefully, then we can all give each other **** for wrong/right prediction.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2027411
    TR1
    Participant

    Why did the Russian Navy exclude the RBU-6000 from the Stereguschy and Admiral Gorshkov class?:confused:

    Do they believe that with Klub ASROC missiles in UKSK they won’t be needing it?

    Or is it a matter of deck space(it occupies the same deck footprint as an 8-cell UKSK VLS)?

    20380 has Paket-NK, apparently has an anti-torpedo function as well. No space for RBU as well.
    Don’t know about 22350, we need to wait to see Gorhkov’s weapons config, but I suspect a similar solution to 20380, maybe bigger torp tubes, probably not though.

    11356Ms will have RBU for sure though. Hopefully with the guided projectiles.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2027425
    TR1
    Participant

    scroll down from that one

    come now, do you think this is ugly?
    [img]http://www.military-today.com/navy/zeven_provincien_class_l1.jpg%5B/img}

    show me what your version of beauty is!

    Not as bad, but that mast is ugly as hell.

    Regarding missiles, packing them in is dictated by internal volume and layout, weight distribution, etc, packing that many more tubes, especially as large as UKSK is difficult. 16 is already a good number on the displacement, same with 48 primary SAMs. Another question is if more are realistically needed, I don’t really see the ship finding itself in the cold war type scenario the VLS farms like the Burkes were made for.

    in reply to: KF-X Question for you experts #2365703
    TR1
    Participant

    I can just see TR1 circa 1985: “China? China will never amount to anything!” Or perhaps 1885: “The Americans? They can’t even stop fighting each other! Don’t make me laugh!”

    Some folks can read the tea leaves; others … well, it’s usually that they just don’t want to.

    In the last decade Indonesia has gone from #28 to #18 in the global GDP rankings. By 2020 you can expect them to be jostling with Turkey for that coveted #10 spot and in the long-run a place in the top ten – likely right alongside Russia – is all but assured.

    Never though that about China, but ok. If Indonesia operates this plane in such vast numbers sometime in the next 15-20 years, you can remind me, and I will be happy to admit I was wrong.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2027436
    TR1
    Participant

    I don’t see any AESA mast in that pic.

    Though lots of new ships all over the world are seeing these ugly bulky top masts.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #14 #2365725
    TR1
    Participant

    Not as much as stupid questions.

    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to63000/062921.jpg

    Mi-24BM they are calling it now.

    http://russianplanes.net/ID62900

    Cool pic of Tu-143 drone, in Ukraine.

    http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=61090&d=1326213923

    2nd Mi-38, hiding in the snow. Pic from a few days ago.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #14 #2365748
    TR1
    Participant

    Yes indeed, like those brand new Su-30MK2’s they just got. :rolleyes:

    And Gepards, and Bastions, and matryshkas of Putin and Medvedev, etc etc.

    in reply to: KF-X Question for you experts #2365755
    TR1
    Participant

    Their F-16 order is cheap as hell for the number of planes, same with the 2nd hand Leo-2 order, nothing special, doesn’t change the fact they have barely been able to trickle their desired Su-30 numbers in, sorry I don’t have confidence they will all of a sudden acquire a bunch of these yet-to-exist planes. Just going by the trends so far.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2027442
    TR1
    Participant

    Thanks Twin. Fugly radar mast aside, stately lines.

    I like how they are continuing with RBU too, system is critical for sub defense IMO.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2027447
    TR1
    Participant

    http://lenta.ru/news/2012/01/10/billion/

    Damage exceeds one billion rubles. Repairs will be carried out by Sevmash.

    That’s not bad if the figure doesn’t rise, 30 million is pocket change to get the sub back.

    in reply to: Indian Missiles News #1794675
    TR1
    Participant

    Always loved the look of the Kub missiles, nice to see it continuing with the Akash.

    in reply to: SA-10 grumble #1794679
    TR1
    Participant

    That’s a detection range for Irbis-E. Would not be a shocking conclusion that the much larger land based radars, among them units like Nebo specifically desighned for the purpose, would get far better numbers against VLO targets.

Viewing 15 posts - 6,706 through 6,720 (of 9,195 total)