Program is going ahead, they found enough customers to pass minimum point, 40 I think airframes.
RR engines for RuAF An-124, come on now Levsha.
Boring Boring !!! not a lot of design or innovation in that little lot !!! all a bit 1990’s
Design and innovation usually goes deeper than external appearances. π
“Π‘Π°ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅Ρ Π±ΡΠ΄Π΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ³Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π-18Π’ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ 3Π, ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ FADEC Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ, ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ 50000 ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ 11111 ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ². ΠΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Ρ Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ³Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ², Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ 16 ΠΠΠΠ ΡΠΎΠΌ 2 (Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ 6-Ρ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ) ΠΈ ΡΡΠΌΡ, Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π³Π»Π°Π²Ρ IV ΠΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ 16 ΠΠΠΠ.”
Modernized D-18T, with fully autonomous FADEC, resource 50,000 hours and 11,111 cycles. Ecological, noise standards, blah blah.
How many people know that the V2 diesel engine in the Soviet T-34 tank is basically copied from a French airship diesel propulsion unit!:eek:
And the US copied Soviet stealth research! Oh wait, that has nothing to do with the thread.
Apparently at the : Kiev National Aeronautics Institute.
The placement is temporary.
ok it is a rip-off are you happy.
so beside making everyone to use the word “rip-off”. or else heap mounts of ridicule upon any one who takes a nuianced view….
what is your value added contribution to sum of our knowledge about anything today? none-zilch-nada-lin
About as much as your land of denial.
Oop, sorry “nuanced” view.
http://russianplanes.net/images/to58000/057563.jpg
Su-27SMs, nice photo.
http://russianplanes.net/images/to58000/057568.jpg
Also, D-18T.
And it is still a rip-off at the end of the day. And no one in the ex-USSR denies that.
Yep. And no one is in denial that it is a blatant copy.
None of this “hurr durr, it had better defensive guns! its more of a modernization11” nonsense.
Nice try though.
Yep. How dare anyone question if the mighty Chinese aviation complex (known for ALL those world class platforms) can replicate and supersede EVERY SINGLE performance characteristic of the plane it ripped-off. What an unreasonable point to bring up.
Whatever. At least I don’t live in denial.
Agreed Teer. The J-15 matching the Su-33 in all parameters is certainly a reasonable question.
They only ordered 4, and that’s it. It was part of the 2009 deal with Sukhoi.
They are ordering more Su-30SM, from Irkut, while we are at it. π
Su-35 will outproduce the Su-30 in RUAF, that is certain at this point.
Teer: FM1 for the Su-33s. Should be a nice power boost.
Very similar.
Uganda too recently.
At least calling J-15 a copy or rip off from Su-33 is a bit flawed, maybe upgrade would be a better word >_>
You can upgrade a copy (not like modern avionics and uprated are a huge upgrade, but that aside), but that still makes it largely a complete rip off. Ok, modernized rip-off. Much better.
If Russia took the F-15A, put on 117S and Bars on it, hell, lets say ECM pods for the “structural difference” argument, it is still a blatant copy.
Upgrade is Su-27SM from Su-27. What is so hard to understand, honestly?