dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,291 through 7,305 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2375385
    TR1
    Participant

    Program is going ahead, they found enough customers to pass minimum point, 40 I think airframes.

    RR engines for RuAF An-124, come on now Levsha.

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2375411
    TR1
    Participant

    Boring Boring !!! not a lot of design or innovation in that little lot !!! all a bit 1990’s

    Design and innovation usually goes deeper than external appearances. πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2375416
    TR1
    Participant

    “Π‘Π°ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ Π±ΡƒΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚ оснащСн ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ€Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ двигатСлями Π”-18Π’ сСрии 3М, ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ€ΡƒΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ Ρ†ΠΈΡ„Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ систСмой управлСния FADEC с ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚ΡΡ‚Π²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ, рСсурсом 50000 часов ΠΈ 11111 Ρ†ΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ². ЭкологичСскиС характСристики двигатСля Π±ΡƒΠ΄ΡƒΡ‚ Π΄ΠΎΡ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π°Π½Ρ‹ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡŽ эмиссии Π²Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π½Ρ‹Ρ… вСщСств, Π² соотвСтствии с трСбованиями ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ 16 ИКАО Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ 2 (с ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ 6-ю Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ) ΠΈ ΡˆΡƒΠΌΡƒ, с обСспСчСниСм Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π³Π»Π°Π²Ρ‹ IV ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ 16 ИКАО.”

    Modernized D-18T, with fully autonomous FADEC, resource 50,000 hours and 11,111 cycles. Ecological, noise standards, blah blah.

    in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2375419
    TR1
    Participant

    How many people know that the V2 diesel engine in the Soviet T-34 tank is basically copied from a French airship diesel propulsion unit!:eek:

    And the US copied Soviet stealth research! Oh wait, that has nothing to do with the thread.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2375425
    TR1
    Participant

    Apparently at the : Kiev National Aeronautics Institute.

    The placement is temporary.

    in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2375446
    TR1
    Participant

    ok it is a rip-off are you happy.

    so beside making everyone to use the word “rip-off”. or else heap mounts of ridicule upon any one who takes a nuianced view….

    what is your value added contribution to sum of our knowledge about anything today? none-zilch-nada-lin

    About as much as your land of denial.

    Oop, sorry “nuanced” view.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2375454
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2375461
    TR1
    Participant

    And it is still a rip-off at the end of the day. And no one in the ex-USSR denies that.

    in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2375476
    TR1
    Participant

    Yep. And no one is in denial that it is a blatant copy.

    None of this “hurr durr, it had better defensive guns! its more of a modernization11” nonsense.

    Nice try though.

    in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2375482
    TR1
    Participant

    Yep. How dare anyone question if the mighty Chinese aviation complex (known for ALL those world class platforms) can replicate and supersede EVERY SINGLE performance characteristic of the plane it ripped-off. What an unreasonable point to bring up.

    Whatever. At least I don’t live in denial.

    in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2375496
    TR1
    Participant

    Agreed Teer. The J-15 matching the Su-33 in all parameters is certainly a reasonable question.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2375506
    TR1
    Participant

    They only ordered 4, and that’s it. It was part of the 2009 deal with Sukhoi.

    They are ordering more Su-30SM, from Irkut, while we are at it. πŸ˜‰

    Su-35 will outproduce the Su-30 in RUAF, that is certain at this point.

    in reply to: Chinese pilot practicing carrier ops on Kuznetsov #2375524
    TR1
    Participant

    Teer: FM1 for the Su-33s. Should be a nice power boost.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2375549
    TR1
    Participant

    Very similar.

    Uganda too recently.

    in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2375558
    TR1
    Participant

    At least calling J-15 a copy or rip off from Su-33 is a bit flawed, maybe upgrade would be a better word >_>

    You can upgrade a copy (not like modern avionics and uprated are a huge upgrade, but that aside), but that still makes it largely a complete rip off. Ok, modernized rip-off. Much better.

    If Russia took the F-15A, put on 117S and Bars on it, hell, lets say ECM pods for the “structural difference” argument, it is still a blatant copy.

    Upgrade is Su-27SM from Su-27. What is so hard to understand, honestly?

Viewing 15 posts - 7,291 through 7,305 (of 9,195 total)