http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=70902
Ukrainian Motor-Sich engines rejected for Ansat.
Well, there are a lot of Chinese, bound to be more photoshops 😀
http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20110726/407334181.html
Mistrals will have 16 helicpters, 8 Ka-52K and 8 Ka-29. The French will enlarge the bays for the Ka-29.
Another successful Sineva launch…
I dont see anything.
EDIT: Good now, thanks!
http://russianplanes.net/images/to50000/049889.jpg
telletubby sighted. Recent photo.
So given that the AL-31s are mostly for the J-10B (only? replacement in there too likely), any way to extrapolate how many J-10Bs are going to be ordered?
Whats with the PS obsession some Chinese seem to have? So irritating.
However, I would like to ask a question: If Su-30MKI is a so perfect and satisifying solution in performance, capability, and future potential for IAF before the era of 5th Gen fighter comes, then why IAF starts MMRCA competition ?? Why not just buy more Su-30MKI with future upgrading ?? Is there any unique (and important enough) function, capability, or requirement for IAF that can only be achieved by Typhoon / Rafale, but not the upgrading Su-30MKI ??
Answer is obvious. Size, expense, fuel expenditure, etc.
Thanks for the info!
Some tidbits:
http://www.aex.ru/news/2011/7/19/86740/
In 2012 Saturn is making 3-4 SaM-146 engines per month. Doesn’t sound like that is enough…
Further, apparently SaM-146 is going to be integrated on the An-158, and Motor-Sich is not happy about that.
It is a possibility that the Indian side bring SK into the mix.
What is your reasoning behind this? I don’t see them wanting to bring in SK, nor being in a position to do so.
Hard not to be superior given the much later introduction, and astronomically higher price of the C-17. Not sure it’s much of an accomplishment, honestly.
He also makes it quite clear that he is not criticising the capability of the Su-30 MKI, but simply stating that the Typhoon is a superior platform which is considered to be of a different generation of aircraft altogether.
That I think is pretty inaccurate. As discussed, the A2A superiority of the Typhoon is…debatable to say the least, and likely a very close run affair. But different generation? With the Su-35C for example, most of the Typhoons advantages over the MKI disappear, while some of the gaps the Flanker enjoys an advantage in grow. Does that make the Su-35 a different gen from the MKI? I don’t think so.
Well, FGFA is a separate entity, but for whats its worth, I find the likeliness of major non Russian/Indian material in the Indianized PAK-FA to be very low. The situation is quiet different from MKI experience. Just my 2c.