Page 535 – Key Publishing

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,011 through 8,025 (of 9,195 total)

← 1 2 3 … 534 535 536 … 611 612 613 →

Author

Posts
July 4, 2011 at 9:47 pm in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #1999721

TR1
Participant

I guess that’s Quadbike’s first naval construction photo if he thinks that’s an unusual amount rust.

July 4, 2011 at 9:46 pm in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2379307

TR1
Participant

@ Levsha: no idea man.

@ Austin: Real.

July 4, 2011 at 9:39 pm in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2379310

TR1
Participant

So much for no more Russian engines. Big deal, wow!

July 3, 2011 at 10:55 pm in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2379608

TR1
Participant

http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/5521/su30mktz8yc3gy2.jpg

July 3, 2011 at 9:40 pm in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #1999940

TR1
Participant

LOL……

A typically insightful and intelligent post by Scooter.

‘LOL’ !

July 3, 2011 at 9:02 am in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2379722

TR1
Participant

Well the eventual radar deflection/blocker solution has not been fitted yet as far as I understand, so I am not sure what those photos reveal tbh. Aside from the intense LEVCON deflection possible.

Though I do spy some zigzags in the panel above the intakes 😉

July 3, 2011 at 12:51 am in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2000050

TR1
Participant

They want to modernise their shipyards as they are inefficient in comparison to Western ones.

That’s a pretty sweeping statement.

July 2, 2011 at 9:40 pm in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2000058

TR1
Participant

http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=230997&download=1

Do want.

July 2, 2011 at 9:20 pm in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2379804

TR1
Participant

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=865_1295716894

Good Su-24 footage from back in the day. Guided bomb and missile employment.

July 2, 2011 at 9:14 pm in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2379808

TR1
Participant

http://twower.livejournal.com/583819.html

Another excellent photo-report from twower about Torzhok.

June 30, 2011 at 9:55 am in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2380826

TR1
Participant

Brahmos is certainly far far too big to fit, as is. Kh-58UShK has been specifically made for PAK-FA though, so when the aircraft enters service it will have a ready stand off ARM, which is pretty nice. Range is 245km max.

The latest Kh-31PD has a maximum range of 250 km.

June 30, 2011 at 8:16 am in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2380873

TR1
Participant

+1 . An “Alarm METEOR” fired 100km from the S-300 launcher (who has a 120km range) is going to get there pretty fast and at that distance , the launching aircraft is safe .

Cheers .

120km range is a lot less than any vaguely modern S-300 variant, not to talk about S-400.

June 30, 2011 at 8:15 am in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2000268

TR1
Participant

Some nice photos of the Soobrazitelny:

http://balancer.ru/cache/sites/c/s/cs5200.vkontakte.ru/u6280914/92443698/800×600/y_d5f86c01.jpg

http://balancer.ru/cache/sites/c/s/cs5200.vkontakte.ru/u6280914/92443698/800×600/y_a7ce7cec.jpg

http://balancer.ru/cache/sites/c/s/cs5200.vkontakte.ru/u6280914/92443698/800×600/y_1bbe6224.jpg

http://balancer.ru/cache/sites/c/s/cs5200.vkontakte.ru/u6280914/92443698/800×600/y_bc18bb60.jpg

June 29, 2011 at 8:31 pm in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2381103

TR1
Participant

Good eye Trident, never noticed that before. The Soviet sickle…:cool:

June 29, 2011 at 1:38 am in reply to: what is the difference between Su-35S and J-11B? #2381578

TR1
Participant

J16 is less like flanker than PAk-FA does.

What?

There is zero basis for this statement.
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 8,011 through 8,025 (of 9,195 total)

← 1 2 3 … 534 535 536 … 611 612 613 →