dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,146 through 8,160 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2318296
    TR1
    Participant

    On a random note, no more Kh-15 in RuAF inventory, all existing stocks expired. 🙁

    in reply to: Military Aviation News From Around The World – VII #2318302
    TR1
    Participant

    Youtube: Building Boeing’s next fighter

    Boeing’s NGAD proposal!

    Hopefully they learned from the x-32 experience. At least make it look like a fighter. 😎

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2318427
    TR1
    Participant

    I don´t understand your point here. USSR DID supply them cheaply, Russia adjust upward prices on Cold War debt. That doesn´t change the fact that USSR was a cheap supplier, in fact unreasonably cheap, as reflected by the fact that nobody offers such deals anymore… :confused:

    So what? :confused:

    Are you speaking of your own opinion? It actually doesn´t seem like that to me.
    I wouldn´t say there are no problems between Russia and India, but that doesn´t mean that either side wants to destroy their relationship.
    There are more direct ways to accomplish that if that was the intent.
    (compare to US´ cutting off of spares and export licences to Venezuela)

    x2.

    Some people do not seem to understand complexities of government and sub-entities dealing with each other.

    Dumbing it down to “backstabbing” and “juvinility” is naive and stupid.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2318431
    TR1
    Participant

    Please…Russians do the best they can. Russia is not a first world country like America,they do the best they can.

    lol, what condescending crap.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2318595
    TR1
    Participant

    They already have LWRs, that’s what the small windows at the fore and aft ends of the wingtip pods are. What the Mi-28 needs is a MAWS and DIRCM, while AFAIK the Ka-52 bizarrely lacks an RWR (which in turn the Havoc has – confused yet?).

    (

    Wait, if it already has LWRs, then what are those Ka-52 like protrusions on both sides of the nose on the “Mi-28N in the desert” pic?

    EDIT: I think actually we agreed, I was talking about launch warning. Sorry for confusion.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2318922
    TR1
    Participant

    http://balancer.ru/cache/sites/f/o/forumimage.ru/uploads/20110601/800x600/130691522701004713.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #477638
    TR1
    Participant

    Hmm very interesting. From the page:

    http://www.armeniadiaspora.com/news/2395-armavias-new-superjet-100-is-falling-apart-says-moscow-blogger.html

    “I dont know who told him no photos are allowed. But I flew on this same plane and had no problem taking pictures.

    farm6.static.flickr.com/…/…

    The interior isnt even made in Russia. They hired an American company to handle the interior. It was a perfectly fine interior. Nothing special, but nothing horrible.”

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1797338
    TR1
    Participant

    At this time Russia have so many different missile like pesho, Rodolfo, Tango III, Rodolfo, Distiller, Austin, sferrin, SS-26, they all are so useful for the Russia, they all need this space and missile to win the war.

    Why don’t I get my missile name 🙁

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #477765
    TR1
    Participant

    http://pics.aviaport.ru/cache/galleries/266/800x800/266620-ssj_01.jpg

    Superjets

    http://pics.aviaport.ru/cache/galleries/266/800x800/266628-ssj_09.jpg

    Aeroflot interior

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2319164
    TR1
    Participant

    I noticed that.
    Hey buddy what do chicks know about machines 😀
    Jokes apart ,cmon , its not a technical blog , read it like a little story if you will.

    True, but it’s just irritating :o. Any piece of 3rd party equipment, automatically :avionics suit is French or Israeli. From what I understand, Indian content has been steadily increasing with every batch, allowing for less 3rd party components.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2319167
    TR1
    Participant

    Ha ha, sorry lol!

    So Mi-28NE are offered with radar? judging by this and by the Indian tender it seems so. Well, it is perfectly possible for their delivery dates.

    But I wonder how will russian ones be equipped with it. Finish current production first and then modernise? or a new serial standart for the next batches (current order)?

    Правда, радиолокационная станция, которая запланирована к установке, до настоящего времени не появилась на серийных машинах. Планируется, что РЛС на “Охотнике” будет устанавливаться только через 2 года. Ми-28Н получит и новую оптико-электронную систему, и новый бортовой оборонительный комплекс. Вертолет со всеми нововведениями получит название Ми-28НМ. Его поставки предвидятся через пару лет.
    http://topwar.ru/5005-nochnoy-ohotnik-i-alligator-idut-v-voyska.html

    -Radar not yet delivered on serial Machines.
    -Planned to be fitted within 2 years.
    -Mi-28 will receive new optoelectronic system, and a new defense suit (I presume that picture of the Mi-28 in the desert has elements of this new system) .
    -Helicopter will be called Mi-28NM. Delivery will begin in a few years.

    Basically, I expect to see the whole defense suit from the Ka-52 to makes it appearance on the Mi-28.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2319258
    TR1
    Participant

    I think the key issue is, did such combat damage actually cause any hindrance to the Russian air effort during the Georgian war or not? I wouldn’t have thought so (plenty more Su-25s from where they came from, within the Russian AF;)).

    Yes, I agree, in the overall context it did not do much. Actually, I think this war was a godsend for the RuAF. Acceptable losses for many lessons learned.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2319267
    TR1
    Participant

    So all those pictures we see of Su-25s flying back to base with their tails half-blown off after been hit with by missiles – they were in fact likely to have been hit by Russian army missiles?:confused::eek:

    The key there is, they returned :D.

    I am talking about downed aircraft. Most were shot down by Russian army or Ossetian militias.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2319349
    TR1
    Participant

    Blog on the line of duty TV show
    Seven Days with Fighter Pilots of the Sukhoi Squadron

    “With the ruggedness of the Russian airframe and the finesse of Western avionics”

    Are they aware that the vast majority of the avionics are Russian and Indian of origin?

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2319353
    TR1
    Participant

    , it happened but still the army cant see beyond their favourite tincans and order a few more arjuns…:rolleyes:

    Interesting, since by anyone who isn’t Indian’s estimates, the T-90 has a heavier armor layout than the Arjun.

    Don’t let national fantasies stop you though!

Viewing 15 posts - 8,146 through 8,160 (of 9,195 total)