dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,311 through 8,325 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2346784
    TR1
    Participant

    @ Twinblade: I guess the typhoon is also better in AtA than the T50, and that the MKI’s engine has been engineered for low altitude flight efficiency, can self protect and jam radars without sacrificing weapons loads…
    And of course somebody told us the Indian are not happy with the AtA capabilities of the MKI…

    What?

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2347266
    TR1
    Participant

    No idea TR1, i always thought that the twin rotors would make it more survivable in hot and high environment, albeit with a lighter armor.

    Indeed. Btw, lighter than Mi-28, not lighter than anything else. Then there is the whole no tail rotor to be shot away upside…

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2347319
    TR1
    Participant

    I believe aside from Lipetsk, Hotilovo operates the BM. Not sure about others. Some nice photoreports from Hotilovo:

    http://alexey-viper.livejournal.com/165669.html
    http://fotografersha.livejournal.com/92656.html

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2347351
    TR1
    Participant

    Good eye Mack, how long were you staring at that thing ;0

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to37000/036470.jpg
    Not the 60, but nothing there. Maybe they can be removed/fitted at will.

    Just a sweet MIG-31 photo, talk about power:
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to43000/042230.jpg

    On another subject, if the MOD does not order MiG-35 or Su-39 from Irkut as rumor has it, I am of the opinion the doubling of the expected follow on Su-35 order is needed. Instead of another 48, 96 through 2020. ~19 aircraft per year should be achievable in that time frame. Would like to see the spending increase translate to tangible gains.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #481585
    TR1
    Participant

    Nice photos, I agree about the Il-86. I remember taking the flight from Mahachkala-Moscow a few times back in the 90s, on the Il-86, it really made an impression. The D-30s make the fuselage look even bigger.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #481596
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to43000/042963.jpg

    Tell me this plane doesn’t have character…

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2347377
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to43000/042971.jpg

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to43000/042966.jpg

    BM

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to43000/042955.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1797653
    TR1
    Participant

    http://a-andreich.livejournal.com/81507.html

    I think these are the most interesting pics to come out from this year.

    For general pics and videos I recommend going here:
    http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?99988-Russian-Photos-%28updated-on-regular-basis%29/page2908

    Used to post there back in the day, full of retards, but the photo threads do deliver.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2347429
    TR1
    Participant

    Kamov choppers couldn’t make it to the finals.

    Based on what? They never even came to India for trials.

    The two Russian heavies will be great in the long run (btw, who actually has factual evidence about the Mi-28s hot and high performance-that was one of the direct lessons from Crocodil in A-stan), but they are simply not finished products yet. The RuMOD is still inducting all the hardware on them, and will be for some time. The Apache is really the only option right now, not sure why India decides to limit itself to essentially a competition with no competition.

    in reply to: J-15 for Russia? #2347432
    TR1
    Participant

    As many articles says “Chinese internet” is the source 🙂 You can find the approximate numbers in almost all Chinese forums. People count them according to regiments.

    200 number may only explain vanilla Su-27, Su-27UB and J-11. It does not include J-11B, J-11BS and Su-30MKs. So, China should have more active Su-27 derivatives (~400) than Russia has.

    That’s assuming all of the airframes delivered are even in operation. We know quite a few have crashed, some withdrawn due to fatigue, etc. They might have more operational than Russia right now. They might now.

    In the end, who cares. Look at the population disparity lol.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2004492
    TR1
    Participant

    The Soobrazitelny recently:

    http://s06.radikal.ru/i179/1105/cb/d71b04638a5ft.jpg

    (Big photo)
    http://i027.radikal.ru/1105/1e/8fbac1810924.jpg

    http://s55.radikal.ru/i148/1105/77/a9b1b6c0bfe1t.jpg

    Changes from the Stergushy:
    http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=223240&download=1

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2004496
    TR1
    Participant

    http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=223193&download=1

    The Ivan Gren, next to an “Indian” (Talwar). Needless to say, the rate of construction does not impress.

    http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=223194&download=1

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2347988
    TR1
    Participant

    Hope they don’t by the apache

    If they insist on buying in the immediate future, it really is the only choice for a heavy attack helo.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2348380
    TR1
    Participant

    yep by 2012, of course, isn’t it a better 5th Gen fighter than F22 , after all!

    What?

    in reply to: J-15 for Russia? #2348525
    TR1
    Participant

    Attn: J-20 Hotdog, TR1

    The title of this thread should be changed. It is quite interesting from a broader
    perspective.

    I am surprised why this SU-27 –> J-11 issue did not result in a massive diplomatic
    spat between Russia and China, angry articles by Russian defence commentators
    and fans aside. If, as it appears, China has been underhanded in its dealings, Russia
    must have lost at least $5 billion to $10 billion in Flanker sales already. Yet,

    1) Russia continues to faithfully supply engines to China, such as D-30, AL-31, and
    RD-93 which has kept Chinese aircraft manufacturing alive and growing for the past
    decade.

    2) Russia still sells weapons to China such as that Ka-31 radar picket for the still to
    be formed carrier battle group.

    3) Continued cooperation in SCO, yearly military exercises.

    4) Did Putin et al ever come out publically to condemn China?

    etc. etc.

    It does not make sense why Russia would be doing all this if China slapped it in the
    face so blatantly. Could there have been some sort of deal in the 1990s that permitted
    China to do this? I understand that Shenyang didn’t go through its entire consignment of
    licenced SU-27 production – preferring to go it alone.

    The country;s links go beyond military. Severing relations over a Su-27 copy is not worth it. One would hope consequences were introduced indirectly though…

Viewing 15 posts - 8,311 through 8,325 (of 9,195 total)