dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,401 through 8,415 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2355314
    TR1
    Participant

    Maybe it was for the first batch of units, that would be understandable.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2355319
    TR1
    Participant

    I recall reading that domestic production actually increased per unit MKI cost….

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2355699
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2355702
    TR1
    Participant

    Ok. I think the thing going to a two engine fighter is pretty stupid but holy man does that Rafale that Quadbike posted look good.

    Boom, nice find man, lmao.

    in reply to: China may have flown the J-18 "Red Eagle" #2355791
    TR1
    Participant

    ectronics system for the most part. It’s based off a prototype Su-33 purchased from the Ukraine. Most Chinese aviation forums are pointing out the electronics, radar, and weapons systems though were most likely all Chinese and far newer than the circa 1980’s equipment of the Russian Su-33.

    One would hope they advanced on Soviet Era avionics.

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #484169
    TR1
    Participant

    As mentioned, political instability and uncertainty. It rears its head surprisingly often and is a real issue, especially with Russia’s desire to pursue an independent foreign policy. The issue isn’t any technical problem…

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2356016
    TR1
    Participant

    I will be interested to see what the Russian reaction will be, the problem they have however much they wax lyrical about the Mig 35 it is still only a warmed over Mig 29 and offers no real exciting technology transfer the Indians don’t already have access to.

    I doubt Russia much cares, given that India has been fretting about dependance on Russia, nobody really considered MiG-35 would win, despite being a good aircraft. “warmed over MiG-29” maybe, I guess SH is warmed over F-18 by that definition, same for F-16, etc etc. Between the MiG-29K and MiG-29UPG deals, and the MKI and PAK-FA programs, UAC has nothing to complain about really.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2356129
    TR1
    Participant

    Indeed, I am seriously concerned for his well being. This might shatter his perception of reality. After all, SH is easily superior to the PAK-FA, how could it lose out to Eurojunk.

    in reply to: Importance of AWACS / Tankers / EW Platforms #2356180
    TR1
    Participant

    It’s much like Russian marketing claims of their IRBIS radars, etc… detecting stealthy aircraft, but then you look at the numbers(90km vs. .01m^2 targets). Of course when you look at the ranges vs. <.001-.0001m^2, the detection range is less than half of that, to less than 1/3.

    Actually the IRBIS was explicitly marketed with the 90km figure for a .01 sized target. Your definition of a stealth target is not their concern.

    Unless you believe that drivel about an operational aircraft actually achieving the marble sized RCS figures. lol.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2356181
    TR1
    Participant

    Doesn’t really matter what you’re convinced by TR1. the IAF evaluated it and found that it was among the top 2.

    Psst. Sarcasm.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2356228
    TR1
    Participant

    Yes , AMRAAM is combat proven and outperforms MICA in all flight regimes
    and its much cheaper since it is produced in great numbers.

    Apparently it doesn’t outperform it in terms of IR tracking.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2356230
    TR1
    Participant

    merlin2, could you kindly spare this thread about your musings on MRCA ?

    Why? His conclusions are so clear. I am convinced the Rafale is worthless in A2A.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2356233
    TR1
    Participant

    How about all matte black? Much like the J-20, that leads to greatly exaggerated stealth qualities. :diablo:

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2356235
    TR1
    Participant

    What I find curious is the number ordered. This is for a helicopter that has zero firm orders so far. Hmmmmmm

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2356239
    TR1
    Participant

    Ken, as always, gracias for your expertise!

    From what I understand there are only very few of the mi-8MTI flying/airworthy/existing, the Mi-8PPA is a relatively more common commodity.

Viewing 15 posts - 8,401 through 8,415 (of 9,195 total)