dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,416 through 8,430 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2356338
    TR1
    Participant

    I was assured by Scooter that the Super Hornet would win. What the hell. 😡

    in reply to: Russian Civil Aviation #484355
    TR1
    Participant

    Iran takes interest in Tu-204SMs

    Does the new PS-90A3 has US P&W components ?

    One would hope they learned from last time :/

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2356583
    TR1
    Participant

    Ha, I have not thought of the ERA connection before, nice one.

    THose are EW variants of the Mi-8 btw. I am not familiar with specifics though.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005204
    TR1
    Participant

    Klub questions can be rested because Indian Navy’s Akula class will be having them as the main weapons as Brahmos wont fit in the tube. This may also mean Russian Navy Akulas may also be using them in the future, if not already.

    They definitely do not have them right now. I also don’t see them getting them any time soon, land attack is just not a priority or a task for those submarines today.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2356628
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to43000/042112.jpg
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to43000/042113.jpg

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2356630
    TR1
    Participant

    Swell! And I’m sure the Chinese will honour those patents. 🙂

    ………..what?

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2356892
    TR1
    Participant

    IMO, the article shows only one side of the story, these contracts were signed when Russia was desperately looking for customers of its massive arms industry, but with the massive growth in russia, the cost of materials as well as skilled manpower has gone up. It is possible that the cost escalation might have been much more than what either sides might have anticipated. If you look at it from the russian view point, they are bound to lose if they sell spares at the current rate and lose more if indians cancel further orders. Regardless of whatever situation it might be, a contract is a contract and it should be respected by both sides. If russians would have stuck to the price escalation as per the contract terms, they might have suffered a few losses, but nothing that couldn’t have been regained from the next deal or co development.

    That’s a very relevant point regarding some of the cost increase- its not simply greed driving them- The Gorshkov being a simple example, it is unfortunate it caused so many problems, but expecting Sevmash to complete all the work at the originally agreed price is absurd. The plant managers have their share of the blame, I believe most were fired anyways for inaccurate price estimation…

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2356904
    TR1
    Participant

    Looks like some training variant or something.

    Pilot’s cockpit:
    http://www.aviastar.org/cockpits/mi-24p_pilot.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005266
    TR1
    Participant

    The second 11356 for Russia will be laid down on July 8th of this year.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2356909
    TR1
    Participant

    Is there any more solid proof about the tire thing aside from some mysterious “sources”?

    Honestly……

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005269
    TR1
    Participant

    Polinom towed array;)

    A pie for you. 🙂

    Also the sonar dome on the Gorshkov seemed huge. 20380 has well sized one for a ship that big too.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2357151
    TR1
    Participant

    Given that they license produce the aircraft, I am surprised they simply did not ask to include wheel production in the deal. It’s not like Russia would have refused.

    Unless, the article, as I suspect, is blowing things way out proportion.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005307
    TR1
    Participant

    http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=217745&download=1

    Here is something you don’t see everyday, 10 points for correct guess.

    http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=220741&download=1

    Nice clear water.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005320
    TR1
    Participant

    Well, Slava is a cool name anyways, Moskva isn’t bad either though.

    Wasn’t the 1164 called Krasina or something by NATO initially?

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005342
    TR1
    Participant

    http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20110421/163634028.html

    Indonesia tests Yakhont.

    Also, 1164 is Atlant 😉 .

Viewing 15 posts - 8,416 through 8,430 (of 9,195 total)