dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 9,016 through 9,030 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mig 29 development #2349229
    TR1
    Participant

    One of the things that always intrigued me about the Mig 29 was its light weight. Is the Mig 35 lighter than the 29? Its take off weight went up 30% but the empty weight went down….Forgive me but this info is from Wikipedia.

    The airframe went substantial changes when the MiG-29M iteration was created, materials used in particular. That could explain the weight change.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2350009
    TR1
    Participant

    Wow great find. Save that to your HDs immediately. Last set “disappeared”.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2350121
    TR1
    Participant

    I hate to ask but:

    1.) what is well done about that animation

    2.) How do you have any clue that the actual aircrfat (assuming it exists) looks anything like that.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2350150
    TR1
    Participant

    I don’t know, doesn’t look deep enough to cover the whole compressor. Something funky is going on in there, but either way, it doesn’t meant squat for final stealth levels.

    in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2350212
    TR1
    Participant

    Well here it is at last – I hope – of the long awaited stealth fighter from China’s Chengdu (611) is already reported to have flown for the first time on December 5, 2010. I make no claims here people, just reporting. Those that are interested should watch the video on You Tube

    Are you serious?

    in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2350817
    TR1
    Participant

    still no picture ?

    the chinese seem to be even more secretive than the russians !

    Or, you know….the program isn’t nearly as close to flying as people seem to believe.

    in reply to: Aircraft with TVC #2351215
    TR1
    Participant

    China has no thrust vectoring models.

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2351407
    TR1
    Participant

    Dear trident,

    So then lets both take the F-117, and the S-300 out of the equation.
    when will the S-400 be ready for export?

    When Russia fulfills its state order. Sometime around 2015-2017 I believe.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2352043
    TR1
    Participant

    Numbers of aircraft are irrelevant
    LOL. Sure they are. When they prove PAF inferiority suddenly it becomes irrelevant.

    Finally, IAFs MIG-29s have not been through an upgrade yet. Essentially you are talking about future stuff and comapring it to the present day. Its insane.

    Actually, the first examples have already been sent to Russia. Within a few years most of the fleet will be upgraded. Not insane, at all.
    The Mirage 2000 upgrade does not make it “on par” with a Block 50 F-16 like some of the Indian poster were implying.
    Good enough, and combined with MiG-29s, will make the block 50 threat irrelevant, to use your favorite word.
    I am simply pointing out that this statement is plain wrong.

    How many F-16 Block 50s does the mighty PAF have again?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2352439
    TR1
    Participant

    What is naturally better about F-16 in A2G?

    I think these upgrades are absurdly expensive as well, but with both MiG-29 and Mirage fleet modernization as well as newer assets, PAF must be feeling uneasy, I would be.

    in reply to: F-14/15 early competition #2352507
    TR1
    Participant

    I was under the impression that the Phoenix was not a particularly effective weapon for engaging maneuvering high energy targets, such as the Eagle.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2352549
    TR1
    Participant

    Yeah those China rip offs Russia articles are about as original as they are accurate.

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2354066
    TR1
    Participant

    The F-22 can stay outside the S-300/400 engagement range, with SDBs. Remember, the WEZ against a supersonic VLO target is going to be much smaller, than the range against legacy targets.

    On the other hand, S-400 batteries protected by Pantsir-S1 will have significant munition deflection capability.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2354219
    TR1
    Participant

    Those R-27s have very long range too. Long range IR weapon for one is useful.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2354233
    TR1
    Participant

    X2

    All I can say is, they’ve shown their true colours of what they think of the rest of the world and they’re certainly not my favourite people at the moment. Feel sorry for the genuine Yanks out there.

    Read up on some of the British Ambassadorial leaks. Not on the same scale certainly, but they come off as just as…unpleasant.

Viewing 15 posts - 9,016 through 9,030 (of 9,195 total)