Not much of a refit, just simple overhaul. Those extensive “modernizations” planned for the Kuz are sometime off in the future, if they ever come about.
photo from a few months ago, after it left dry dock.
http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=194578&download=1
http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=196710&download=1
It was already repaired, and is already out of the dock.
A nice photo.

http://www.lenta.ru/news/2010/12/02/mi38/
Serial Mi-38 production to begin in 2013.
http://www.take-off.ru/news/102-november-2010/525-tu-214pu-11-2010

Second Tu-214PU flies.

955 looks perfectly streamlined out in the water, pretty handsome design. In dock its hull and sail make the proportions look ugly.
The Indian Navy just ordered another significant batch of MiG-29Ks. So yeah, I very much agree with them. 🙂
Yeah, they placed that for a non ski jump equipped carrier. Once again, your claims about MiG-29K and contemporary performance on a ski jump carrier are un-substantiated.
While that alone makes this argument with you irrelevant, your comments regarding weaponry are dubious. If India requires, Zhuk-AE can be retrofitted making the radar disadvantage non-existent. Further, MiG-29K has performance superiority over the SH in quite a few flight regimes and areas.
The difference between you and I is I don’t claim MiG-29K superiority over all other naval fighters, but simply point out that your sweeping remarks about MiG-29K performance when compared to your beloved SH are wrong. When looked at a cost-effectiveness stand point, well, that certainly does not favor the SH.
Once again no concrete proof to back up your sweeping statements about the MiG-29K. Good job. Still waiting for those figures regarding all those aircraft on ski-jump and catapult carriers.
How about you provide me with proof (you are the one making the claims here, the burden is on you) about the relative performances of the SH, Rafale, MiG-29K, whatever, on both ski jump and catapult carriers.
The Super Hornet, Rafale, and Lightning would all have limitation in payload while operating from a Ski Jump Carrier no doubt. Yet, they would all exceed the performance of the Mig-29K nonetheless. That being said I only see small gains by all of the contenders except the F-35C. Which, is why I believe India is really interested in the latter.
Not in everything they wouldn’t.
How do we know they are maneuverable?
Well, if it was done on the Topol-M, would be logical to continue the practice on an essentially updated Topol-M frame.
I was under the impression that the keel has already been laid?
Look here:
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,11458.0.html
Hmmm. Thanks for link!
Well to translate a few things from that forum:
http://forums.airbase.ru/2009/11/t69336,8–proekt-58250-poslednij-shans-ukrainskikh-korabelov.html
-No funding for corvettes in 2010 budget.
-Was planned to be laid down in June, pushed back.
A few posted pics of the supposed laid down corvette, apparently the process has been slow, and as you can see in the photos, very very early stage of construction. However, I did not see this pics before, nice to see something has been started at least.
Also, why don’t we call it Gaidak from now. 🙂
They will probably for for RVV-MD after R-73 is integrated.