dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 9,106 through 9,120 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2362771
    TR1
    Participant

    The Russian Paint Schemes are ugly and old school. I hope they put some Fine Grey on the T-50 than these stupid blue and yellow colours on Su 35s.

    Can’t wait to see the T-50 in IAF Grey.

    Have you not seen the second Su-35? or the Mig-29SMTS?

    Much better than that boring IAF grey.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2020064
    TR1
    Participant

    Hm? That was “completed” as a training ship.

    IF by completed you mean hull was unfinished and “frozen” in hopes of future completion, then yes.

    Pics:
    http://oi52.tinypic.com/6ih2qh.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2363373
    TR1
    Participant

    There is a new order on the doorstep.. another 24 Su-34.
    That’s on top of the 32 or was it 36..?

    Sorry for the spoil W…;)

    Current order is for 32, according to nike8887 (works at NAPO). He also said that they can even right now make considerably more than 12 airframes a year, the bottleneck is the on-board equipment they receive to install.

    I think an EW variant is almost a given, the aircrfat would be perfect for it, though perhaps not in a dedicated role. Plus, it has already been flying with rather large EW pods.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2363609
    TR1
    Participant

    If you want to compare Chinese and Russian aerospace industrys my personal opinion is slightly disjointed. In one respect I feel there are many areas where Russia is certainly ahead of China, for example they can make a reliable high thrust engine, airframe materials and Radar. But there are areas where China has parity and even in some respects moved beyond for example Cockpit avionics and systems.

    how so? Some fancy mockups that exist only in show rooms aside, where has Chinese cockpit technology overtaken Russian?

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2363613
    TR1
    Participant

    😉

    An advanced cockpit, a simple mock up does not make.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2363677
    TR1
    Participant

    From the latest Vzlet:

    В журнале “Взлет” 11.10 интервью с директором НИИП им. Тихомирова Ю. Белым. Касаются темы создания АФАр для ПАК ФА. Разговор, в частности, идет о пяти АФАР, планируемых к установке на каждый самолет. Основная (Х-диапазон, передняя), две боковых (с такими ППМ, как на основной, но с меньшим их кол-вом) и две крылевых L-диапазона.

    Interview with the director of NIIP Tikhimorov. Subject regarding 5 AESA arrays being equipped on each PAK-FA. X band one in the front, two side arrays, and two wing L band arrays.

    Wow!

    -Cheers,
    TR1

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2363692
    TR1
    Participant

    still, not sure why the Russians opted the Havoc over Hokum. anyone care to explain? could the negative G issue not be resolved?

    Don’t ask that question. A Metallica vs. Megadeath, Ak-47 vs M-16 type rage fest will ensue. :dev2:

    On the subject though, Ka-50/52 has not been completely abandoned. It is in production actually…

    Also, K-50-2 more capable than the Mi-28N? Deeeeebatable. Not to mention Kamov doesn’t even have the Ka-52 completely down in 2010, almost 2011, let alone that mockup that the Erogan was. Can’t compare something that is being actively built, delivered, and perfected, to something that died before ever existing.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2363695
    TR1
    Participant

    As even the IAF has discovered the IL-76 family are expensive to operate and plagued with technical problems and spares shortages.

    Interestingly, the Russian air force has never had any of those problems. Hence why they have commited to Il-76, though Il-76M-90 and Il-476.

    Austin, I agree with you. Lot’s of flack being posted on these “unbiased” blogs….little facts though.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2363696
    TR1
    Participant

    At that rate, they’ll have a squadron of them in 3 more years.:cool:

    :rolleyes:

    Production next year is slated to be 8-12 aiframes.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2364083
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.airforce.ru/photogallery/gallery9/pak-fa/mb_pak-fa_800.jpg

    Also apparently a follow on contract for 30 Mi-28Ns has been signed, on top of the current 67 airframe contract.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2020320
    TR1
    Participant

    http://arms-tass.su/?page=article&aid=90239&cid=44

    Before the end of November, the second Boreii, the Alexander Nevsky is planned for launch.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News From Around The World – VI #2364287
    TR1
    Participant

    Phrasing is a little funky, 4 are going to be delivered sometime in December, to finish the 6 aircraft batch.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2020411
    TR1
    Participant

    Ehh, the chances of coming back are alright if not good, from what I have read on Russian forums. Certainly far better than the other ships of the class. Right now however there is zero modernization on the way, nor is it funded for the next year or two…crew has been mostly caretaking it, but it would appear engine is being worked on, as well as other critical hull components. I don’t think the hull has been deteriorating like say the Lazarev.

    Anyways hopefully the modernization doesn’t go the Kulakov route.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2020586
    TR1
    Participant

    We are not even sure it is ready for the Gorshkov itself. Though I am cautiously hopefully…

    -TR1

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2364694
    TR1
    Participant

    No I do not think it will be that bad. But come next decade India (not just IAF) may have in its inventory.

    T-50
    F-35
    Rafale
    Super Hornet or Typhoon
    MKIs upgraded to Su 35 standards

    Formidable frontline Aircraft from the Europe Russia and U.S

    Formidable yeah. But in my opinion, having Su-30, AND Rafale AND SH or Typhoon is absurd and senseless. From both a capability overlap, price for buying separate aircrfat (economics of scale don’t play in as with single or even two types), supply lines, spare support and maintenance when actually in service…all of that would be needlessly complicated.

    I feel the same about F-35 and T-50, jus’t don’t see that happening.
    -TR1

Viewing 15 posts - 9,106 through 9,120 (of 9,195 total)